intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Initial definitions for slpc
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 16:27:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e1debcc-3439-10ac-6c58-8be5f56340da@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710012026.19705-3-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

Hi Vinay,

On 10.07.2021 03:20, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Add macros to check for slpc support. This feature is currently supported
> for gen12+ and enabled whenever guc submission is enabled/selected.

please try to use consistent names across all patches:

s/slpc/SLPC
s/gen12/Gen12
s/guc/GuC

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sundaresan Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c        |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h        |  2 ++
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h | 16 ++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c         |  6 ++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h         |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
> index 979128e28372..b9a809f2d221 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ void intel_guc_init_early(struct intel_guc *guc)
>  	intel_guc_ct_init_early(&guc->ct);
>  	intel_guc_log_init_early(&guc->log);
>  	intel_guc_submission_init_early(guc);
> +	intel_guc_slpc_init_early(guc);
>  
>  	mutex_init(&guc->send_mutex);
>  	spin_lock_init(&guc->irq_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> index 5d94cf482516..e5a456918b88 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ struct intel_guc {
>  
>  	bool submission_supported;
>  	bool submission_selected;
> +	bool slpc_supported;
> +	bool slpc_selected;
>  
>  	struct i915_vma *ads_vma;
>  	struct __guc_ads_blob *ads_blob;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 9c102bf0c8e3..e2644a05f298 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -2351,6 +2351,27 @@ void intel_guc_submission_init_early(struct intel_guc *guc)
>  	guc->submission_selected = __guc_submission_selected(guc);
>  }
>  
> +static bool __guc_slpc_supported(struct intel_guc *guc)

hmm, easy to confuse with intel_guc_slpc_is_supported, so maybe:

__detect_slpc_supported()

(yes, I know you were following code above)

> +{
> +	/* GuC slpc is unavailable for pre-Gen12 */

s/slpc/SLPC

> +	return guc->submission_supported &&
> +		GRAPHICS_VER(guc_to_gt(guc)->i915) >= 12;
> +}
> +
> +static bool __guc_slpc_selected(struct intel_guc *guc)
> +{
> +	if (!intel_guc_slpc_is_supported(guc))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return guc->submission_selected;
> +}
> +
> +void intel_guc_slpc_init_early(struct intel_guc *guc)
> +{
> +	guc->slpc_supported = __guc_slpc_supported(guc);
> +	guc->slpc_selected = __guc_slpc_selected(guc);
> +}

in patch 4/16 you are introducing intel_guc_slpc.c|h so to have proper
encapsulation better to define this function as

void intel_guc_slpc_init_early(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) { }

and move it to intel_guc_slpc.c

> +
>  static inline struct intel_context *
>  g2h_context_lookup(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 desc_idx)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h
> index be767eb6ff71..7ae5fd052faf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  struct drm_printer;
>  struct intel_engine_cs;
>  
> +void intel_guc_slpc_init_early(struct intel_guc *guc);

it really does not belong to this .h

>  void intel_guc_submission_init_early(struct intel_guc *guc);
>  int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc);
>  void intel_guc_submission_enable(struct intel_guc *guc);
> @@ -50,4 +51,19 @@ static inline bool intel_guc_submission_is_used(struct intel_guc *guc)
>  	return intel_guc_is_used(guc) && intel_guc_submission_is_wanted(guc);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool intel_guc_slpc_is_supported(struct intel_guc *guc)
> +{
> +	return guc->slpc_supported;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool intel_guc_slpc_is_wanted(struct intel_guc *guc)
> +{
> +	return guc->slpc_selected;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool intel_guc_slpc_is_used(struct intel_guc *guc)
> +{
> +	return intel_guc_submission_is_used(guc) && intel_guc_slpc_is_wanted(guc);
> +}

did you try to define them in intel_guc_slpc.h ?

note that to avoid circular dependencies you can define slpc struct in
intel_guc_slpc_types.h and then

in intel_guc.h:
	#include "intel_guc_slpc_types.h" instead of intel_guc_slpc.h

in intel_guc_slpc.h:
	#include "intel_guc.h"
	#include "intel_guc_slpc_types.h"
	#include "intel_guc_submission.h"

> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> index 61be0aa81492..dca5f6d0641b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> @@ -76,16 +76,18 @@ static void __confirm_options(struct intel_uc *uc)
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uc_to_gt(uc)->i915;
>  
>  	drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
> -		"enable_guc=%d (guc:%s submission:%s huc:%s)\n",
> +		"enable_guc=%d (guc:%s submission:%s huc:%s slpc:%s)\n",
>  		i915->params.enable_guc,
>  		yesno(intel_uc_wants_guc(uc)),
>  		yesno(intel_uc_wants_guc_submission(uc)),
> -		yesno(intel_uc_wants_huc(uc)));
> +		yesno(intel_uc_wants_huc(uc)),
> +		yesno(intel_uc_wants_guc_slpc(uc)));
>  
>  	if (i915->params.enable_guc == 0) {
>  		GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_wants_guc(uc));
>  		GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_wants_guc_submission(uc));
>  		GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_wants_huc(uc));
> +		GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_wants_guc_slpc(uc));
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> index e2da2b6e76e1..38e465fd8a0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ __uc_state_checker(x, func, uses, used)
>  uc_state_checkers(guc, guc);
>  uc_state_checkers(huc, huc);
>  uc_state_checkers(guc, guc_submission);
> +uc_state_checkers(guc, guc_slpc);
>  
>  #undef uc_state_checkers
>  #undef __uc_state_checker
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-10 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-10  1:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/16] Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/guc: Squashed patch - DO NOT REVIEW Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Initial definitions for slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 14:27   ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2021-07-12 18:40     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-12 23:43     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when slpc is enabled Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Lay out slpc init/enable/disable/fini Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 14:35   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-13  0:37     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Adding slpc communication interfaces Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 15:52   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-13 23:22     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allocate, initialize and release slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 16:05   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-14  1:40     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable slpc and add related H2G events Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 17:37   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-15  1:58     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 17:36       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add methods to set min/max frequency Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10  3:07   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10  5:17   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 17:47   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-16 18:00     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add get max/min freq hooks Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 17:52   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-20 22:08     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add debugfs for slpc info Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:08   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-20 23:00     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable ARAT timer interrupt Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits for slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:15   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-17 19:30     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-20 23:05     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update slpc to use platform min/max Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10  6:18   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10  7:30   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10  7:30   ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_rps_read_punit_req() can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-10 13:54   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for slpc kernel test robot
2021-07-10 18:20   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-20 23:38     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: slpc selftest Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:29   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21  1:06     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/guc/rc: Setup and enable GUCRC feature Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:41   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21  1:11     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10  1:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Enable GuC based power management features Patchwork
2021-07-10  1:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-10  2:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1e1debcc-3439-10ac-6c58-8be5f56340da@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).