From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E1CC433E0 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 17:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67EFF20708 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 17:50:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 67EFF20708 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD446E857; Wed, 20 May 2020 17:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F496E857 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 17:49:57 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: VtgztlDMh78itA2IpVKpTrsbE3SPfoF1i7TgA+BgVRyeSh97nmsZzB6yisa4SgQoBCh8t23Oeq uA+rY87FtUlg== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 May 2020 10:49:56 -0700 IronPort-SDR: hWwPVUi/+44aInk9WPlWyDoZeIcCpLxICwcRC7yEzo4g4z6IpQYraZrObCqhgRZJ9L6IPb3iA6 ly0pHU/otPFQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,414,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="412103561" Received: from ckosaraj-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO ldmartin-desk1) ([10.255.71.254]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 May 2020 10:49:55 -0700 Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 10:49:54 -0700 From: Lucas De Marchi To: Borislav Petkov Message-ID: <20200520174954.rtdp27brfpm4v4fv@ldmartin-desk1> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore References: <20200504225227.464666-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> <20200504225227.464666-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> <83F5C7385F545743AD4FB2A62F75B073482C132A@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200520093025.GD1457@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200520093025.GD1457@zn.tnic> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/22] x86/gpu: add RKL stolen memory support X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:30:25AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: >On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 04:57:27PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> The following files are outside of i915 maintenance scope: >> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c >> >> Can we get an ack? > >Acked-by: Borislav Petkov > >> Going forward, for simple changes like this, do you prefer to still >> ack on it or should we just apply to our tree? > >Well, we are very quickly to give an ACK for trivial stuff like that >if we get CCed upfront on the patch. It keeps us aware of what's being >changed outside of tip. that works, thanks for quick reply and ack. Lucas De Marchi > >Thx. > >-- >Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > >https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx