intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/57] drm/i915: Move common active lists from engine to i915_scheduler
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:12:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <803964cf-3eb3-6eb7-c96c-fcf041781e23@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201085715.27435-21-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 01/02/2021 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Extract the scheduler lists into a related structure, stop sprawling
> over struct intel_engine_cs. Also transfer the responsibility of tracing
> the scheduler events from ENGINE_TRACE() to SCHED_TRACE().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c   |  8 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c     | 33 ++------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h  | 10 +--
>   .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c  | 27 ++++---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/mock_engine.c         |  7 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c           |  8 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h           |  8 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c         | 78 ++++++++++++++-----
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h         | 13 +++-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h   | 31 +++++++-
>   .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_scheduler.c   |  1 +
>   11 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> index ecacfae8412d..ca37d93ef5e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -422,11 +422,11 @@ __active_engine(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_engine_cs **active)
>   	 * check that we have acquired the lock on the final engine.
>   	 */
>   	locked = READ_ONCE(rq->engine);
> -	spin_lock_irq(&locked->active.lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&locked->sched.lock);
>   	while (unlikely(locked != (engine = READ_ONCE(rq->engine)))) {
> -		spin_unlock(&locked->active.lock);
> +		spin_unlock(&locked->sched.lock);
>   		locked = engine;
> -		spin_lock(&locked->active.lock);
> +		spin_lock(&locked->sched.lock);
>   	}
>   
>   	if (i915_request_is_active(rq)) {
> @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ __active_engine(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_engine_cs **active)
>   		ret = true;
>   	}
>   
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&locked->active.lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&locked->sched.lock);
>   
>   	return ret;
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> index a2916c7fcc48..d7ff84d92936 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -575,8 +575,6 @@ void intel_engine_init_execlists(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   
>   	execlists->queue_priority_hint = INT_MIN;
>   	execlists->queue = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
> -
> -	i915_sched_init_ipi(&execlists->ipi);
>   }
>   
>   static void cleanup_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> @@ -692,7 +690,12 @@ static int engine_setup_common(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   		goto err_status;
>   	}
>   
> -	intel_engine_init_active(engine, ENGINE_PHYSICAL);
> +	i915_sched_init(&engine->sched,
> +			engine->i915->drm.dev,
> +			engine->name,
> +			engine->mask,
> +			ENGINE_PHYSICAL);
> +
>   	intel_engine_init_execlists(engine);
>   	intel_engine_init_cmd_parser(engine);
>   	intel_engine_init__pm(engine);
> @@ -761,28 +764,6 @@ static int measure_breadcrumb_dw(struct intel_context *ce)
>   	return dw;
>   }
>   
> -void
> -intel_engine_init_active(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, unsigned int subclass)
> -{
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->active.requests);
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->active.hold);
> -
> -	spin_lock_init(&engine->active.lock);
> -	lockdep_set_subclass(&engine->active.lock, subclass);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Due to an interesting quirk in lockdep's internal debug tracking,
> -	 * after setting a subclass we must ensure the lock is used. Otherwise,
> -	 * nr_unused_locks is incremented once too often.
> -	 */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> -	local_irq_disable();
> -	lock_map_acquire(&engine->active.lock.dep_map);
> -	lock_map_release(&engine->active.lock.dep_map);
> -	local_irq_enable();
> -#endif
> -}
> -
>   static struct intel_context *
>   create_pinned_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   		      unsigned int hwsp,
> @@ -930,7 +911,7 @@ int intel_engines_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
>    */
>   void intel_engine_cleanup_common(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   {
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&engine->active.requests));
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&engine->sched.requests));
>   	tasklet_kill(&engine->execlists.tasklet); /* flush the callback */
>   
>   	intel_breadcrumbs_free(engine->breadcrumbs);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> index e5637e831d28..0936b0699cbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> @@ -258,8 +258,6 @@ struct intel_engine_execlists {
>   	struct rb_root_cached queue;
>   	struct rb_root_cached virtual;
>   
> -	struct i915_sched_ipi ipi;
> -
>   	/**
>   	 * @csb_write: control register for Context Switch buffer
>   	 *
> @@ -329,11 +327,7 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
>   
>   	struct intel_sseu sseu;
>   
> -	struct i915_sched {
> -		spinlock_t lock;
> -		struct list_head requests;
> -		struct list_head hold; /* ready requests, but on hold */
> -	} active;
> +	struct i915_sched sched;
>   
>   	/* keep a request in reserve for a [pm] barrier under oom */
>   	struct i915_request *request_pool;
> @@ -626,7 +620,7 @@ intel_engine_has_relative_mmio(const struct intel_engine_cs * const engine)
>   static inline struct i915_sched *
>   intel_engine_get_scheduler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   {
> -	return &engine->active;
> +	return &engine->sched;
>   }
>   
>   #endif /* __INTEL_ENGINE_TYPES_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> index 280d84c4e4b7..dd1429a476d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int virtual_prio(const struct intel_engine_execlists *el)
>   static bool need_preempt(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   			 const struct i915_request *rq)
>   {
> -	const struct i915_sched *se = &engine->active;
> +	const struct i915_sched *se = &engine->sched;
>   	int last_prio;
>   
>   	if (!intel_engine_has_semaphores(engine))
> @@ -1019,7 +1019,7 @@ timeslice_yield(const struct intel_engine_execlists *el,
>   static bool needs_timeslice(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   			    const struct i915_request *rq)
>   {
> -	const struct i915_sched *se = &engine->active;
> +	const struct i915_sched *se = &engine->sched;
>   
>   	if (!intel_engine_has_timeslices(engine))
>   		return false;
> @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   	while ((ve = first_virtual_engine(engine))) {
>   		struct i915_request *rq;
>   
> -		spin_lock(&ve->base.active.lock);
> +		spin_lock(&ve->base.sched.lock);
>   
>   		rq = ve->request;
>   		if (unlikely(!virtual_matches(ve, rq, engine)))
> @@ -1286,12 +1286,12 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   		GEM_BUG_ON(rq->context != &ve->context);
>   
>   		if (unlikely(rq_prio(rq) < queue_prio(execlists))) {
> -			spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
> +			spin_unlock(&ve->base.sched.lock);
>   			break;
>   		}
>   
>   		if (last && !can_merge_rq(last, rq)) {
> -			spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
> +			spin_unlock(&ve->base.sched.lock);
>   			spin_unlock(&se->lock);
>   			return; /* leave this for another sibling */
>   		}
> @@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   
>   		i915_request_put(rq);
>   unlock:
> -		spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
> +		spin_unlock(&ve->base.sched.lock);
>   
>   		/*
>   		 * Hmm, we have a bunch of virtual engine requests,
> @@ -2704,7 +2704,7 @@ static void execlists_reset_cancel(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   		rb_erase_cached(rb, &execlists->virtual);
>   		RB_CLEAR_NODE(rb);
>   
> -		spin_lock(&ve->base.active.lock);
> +		spin_lock(&ve->base.sched.lock);
>   		rq = fetch_and_zero(&ve->request);
>   		if (rq) {
>   			if (i915_request_mark_eio(rq)) {
> @@ -2716,7 +2716,7 @@ static void execlists_reset_cancel(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   
>   			ve->base.execlists.queue_priority_hint = INT_MIN;
>   		}
> -		spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
> +		spin_unlock(&ve->base.sched.lock);
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Remaining _unready_ requests will be nop'ed when submitted */
> @@ -3002,13 +3002,13 @@ static void rcu_virtual_context_destroy(struct work_struct *wrk)
>   		if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(node))
>   			continue;
>   
> -		spin_lock_irq(&sibling->active.lock);
> +		spin_lock_irq(&sibling->sched.lock);
>   
>   		/* Detachment is lazily performed in the execlists tasklet */
>   		if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(node))
>   			rb_erase_cached(node, &sibling->execlists.virtual);
>   
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&sibling->active.lock);
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&sibling->sched.lock);
>   	}
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(__tasklet_is_scheduled(&ve->base.execlists.tasklet));
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(virtual_queue(ve)));
> @@ -3355,7 +3355,6 @@ intel_execlists_create_virtual(struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
>   
>   	snprintf(ve->base.name, sizeof(ve->base.name), "virtual");
>   
> -	intel_engine_init_active(&ve->base, ENGINE_VIRTUAL);
>   	intel_engine_init_execlists(&ve->base);
>   
>   	ve->base.cops = &virtual_context_ops;
> @@ -3441,6 +3440,12 @@ intel_execlists_create_virtual(struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
>   
>   	ve->base.flags |= I915_ENGINE_IS_VIRTUAL;
>   
> +	i915_sched_init(&ve->base.sched,
> +			ve->base.i915->drm.dev,
> +			ve->base.name,
> +			ve->base.mask,
> +			ENGINE_VIRTUAL);
> +
>   	virtual_engine_initial_hint(ve);
>   	return &ve->context;
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/mock_engine.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/mock_engine.c
> index b4d26d3bf39f..8b1c2727d25c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/mock_engine.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/mock_engine.c
> @@ -328,7 +328,12 @@ int mock_engine_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   {
>   	struct intel_context *ce;
>   
> -	intel_engine_init_active(engine, ENGINE_MOCK);
> +	i915_sched_init(&engine->sched,
> +			engine->i915->drm.dev,
> +			engine->name,
> +			engine->mask,
> +			ENGINE_MOCK);
> +
>   	intel_engine_init_execlists(engine);
>   	intel_engine_init__pm(engine);
>   	intel_engine_init_retire(engine);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> index 947e4fad7cf0..d736c1aae6e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> @@ -255,10 +255,10 @@ static void remove_from_engine(struct i915_request *rq)
>   	 * check that the rq still belongs to the newly locked engine.
>   	 */
>   	locked = READ_ONCE(rq->engine);
> -	spin_lock_irq(&locked->active.lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&locked->sched.lock);
>   	while (unlikely(locked != (engine = READ_ONCE(rq->engine)))) {
> -		spin_unlock(&locked->active.lock);
> -		spin_lock(&engine->active.lock);
> +		spin_unlock(&locked->sched.lock);
> +		spin_lock(&engine->sched.lock);
>   		locked = engine;
>   	}
>   	list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static void remove_from_engine(struct i915_request *rq)
>   	/* Prevent further __await_execution() registering a cb, then flush */
>   	set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &rq->fence.flags);
>   
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&locked->active.lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&locked->sched.lock);
>   
>   	__notify_execute_cb_imm(rq);
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> index e320edd718f3..3a5d6bdcd8dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> @@ -51,11 +51,13 @@ struct i915_capture_list {
>   	struct i915_vma *vma;
>   };
>   
> +#define RQ_FMT "%llx:%lld"
> +#define RQ_ARG(rq) (rq) ? (rq)->fence.context : 0, (rq) ? (rq)->fence.seqno : 0
> +
>   #define RQ_TRACE(rq, fmt, ...) do {					\
>   	const struct i915_request *rq__ = (rq);				\
> -	ENGINE_TRACE(rq__->engine, "fence %llx:%lld, current %d " fmt,	\
> -		     rq__->fence.context, rq__->fence.seqno,		\
> -		     hwsp_seqno(rq__), ##__VA_ARGS__);			\
> +	ENGINE_TRACE(rq__->engine, "fence " RQ_FMT ", current %d " fmt,	\
> +		     RQ_ARG(rq__), hwsp_seqno(rq__), ##__VA_ARGS__);	\
>   } while (0)
>   
>   enum {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> index 663db3c36762..5eea8c6b85a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> @@ -85,16 +85,48 @@ static void ipi_schedule(struct work_struct *wrk)
>   	} while (rq);
>   }
>   
> -void i915_sched_init_ipi(struct i915_sched_ipi *ipi)
> +static void i915_sched_init_ipi(struct i915_sched_ipi *ipi)
>   {
>   	INIT_WORK(&ipi->work, ipi_schedule);
>   	ipi->list = NULL;
>   }
>   
> +void i915_sched_init(struct i915_sched *se,
> +		     struct device *dev,
> +		     const char *name,
> +		     unsigned long mask,
> +		     unsigned int subclass)
> +{
> +	spin_lock_init(&se->lock);
> +	lockdep_set_subclass(&se->lock, subclass);
> +
> +	se->dbg.dev = dev;
> +	se->dbg.name = name;
> +
> +	se->mask = mask;
> +
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&se->requests);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&se->hold);
> +
> +	i915_sched_init_ipi(&se->ipi);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Due to an interesting quirk in lockdep's internal debug tracking,
> +	 * after setting a subclass we must ensure the lock is used. Otherwise,
> +	 * nr_unused_locks is incremented once too often.
> +	 */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> +	local_irq_disable();
> +	lock_map_acquire(&se->lock.dep_map);
> +	lock_map_release(&se->lock.dep_map);
> +	local_irq_enable();
> +#endif
> +}
> +
>   static void __ipi_add(struct i915_request *rq)
>   {
>   #define STUB ((struct i915_request *)1)
> -	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = READ_ONCE(rq->engine);
> +	struct i915_sched *se = i915_request_get_scheduler(rq);
>   	struct i915_request *first;
>   
>   	if (!i915_request_get_rcu(rq))
> @@ -114,13 +146,13 @@ static void __ipi_add(struct i915_request *rq)
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Carefully insert ourselves into the head of the llist */
> -	first = READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.ipi.list);
> +	first = READ_ONCE(se->ipi.list);
>   	do {
>   		rq->sched.ipi_link = ptr_pack_bits(first, 1, 1);
> -	} while (!try_cmpxchg(&engine->execlists.ipi.list, &first, rq));
> +	} while (!try_cmpxchg(&se->ipi.list, &first, rq));
>   
>   	if (!first)
> -		queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &engine->execlists.ipi.work);
> +		queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &se->ipi.work);
>   }
>   
>   /*
> @@ -133,11 +165,11 @@ static void __ipi_add(struct i915_request *rq)
>   	struct i915_request * const rq__ = (rq); \
>   	struct intel_engine_cs *engine__ = READ_ONCE(rq__->engine); \
>   \
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine__->active.lock, (flags)); \
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine__->sched.lock, (flags)); \
>   	while (engine__ != READ_ONCE((rq__)->engine)) { \
> -		spin_unlock(&engine__->active.lock); \
> +		spin_unlock(&engine__->sched.lock); \
>   		engine__ = READ_ONCE(rq__->engine); \
> -		spin_lock(&engine__->active.lock); \
> +		spin_lock(&engine__->sched.lock); \
>   	} \
>   \
>   	engine__; \
> @@ -303,12 +335,11 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   	if (inflight->context == rq->context)
>   		return;
>   
> -	ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
> -		     "bumping queue-priority-hint:%d for rq:%llx:%lld, inflight:%llx:%lld prio %d\n",
> -		     prio,
> -		     rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno,
> -		     inflight->fence.context, inflight->fence.seqno,
> -		     inflight->sched.attr.priority);
> +	SCHED_TRACE(&engine->sched,
> +		    "bumping queue-priority-hint:%d for rq:" RQ_FMT ", inflight:" RQ_FMT " prio %d\n",
> +		    prio,
> +		    RQ_ARG(rq), RQ_ARG(inflight),
> +		    inflight->sched.attr.priority);
>   
>   	engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
>   	if (need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
> @@ -333,6 +364,9 @@ static void __i915_request_set_priority(struct i915_request *rq, int prio)
>   	struct list_head *pos = &rq->sched.signalers_list;
>   	struct list_head *plist;
>   
> +	SCHED_TRACE(&engine->sched, "PI for " RQ_FMT ", prio:%d\n",
> +		    RQ_ARG(rq), prio);
> +
>   	plist = lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -461,7 +495,7 @@ void i915_request_set_priority(struct i915_request *rq, int prio)
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(rq_prio(rq) != prio);
>   
>   unlock:
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->active.lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->sched.lock, flags);
>   }
>   
>   void __i915_sched_defer_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> @@ -473,6 +507,8 @@ void __i915_sched_defer_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   	struct i915_request *rn;
>   	LIST_HEAD(dfs);
>   
> +	SCHED_TRACE(se, "defer request " RQ_FMT "\n", RQ_ARG(rq));
> +
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&se->lock);
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags));
>   
> @@ -601,6 +637,8 @@ void i915_request_enqueue(struct i915_request *rq)
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   	bool kick = false;
>   
> +	SCHED_TRACE(se, "queue request " RQ_FMT "\n", RQ_ARG(rq));
> +
>   	/* Will be called from irq-context when using foreign fences. */
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&se->lock, flags);
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags));
> @@ -660,6 +698,10 @@ __i915_sched_rewind_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   		active = rq;
>   	}
>   
> +	SCHED_TRACE(se,
> +		    "rewind requests, active request " RQ_FMT "\n",
> +		    RQ_ARG(active));
> +
>   	return active;
>   }
>   
> @@ -678,8 +720,7 @@ bool __i915_sched_suspend_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   	if (i915_request_on_hold(rq))
>   		return false;
>   
> -	ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "suspending request %llx:%lld\n",
> -		     rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno);
> +	SCHED_TRACE(se, "suspending request " RQ_FMT "\n", RQ_ARG(rq));
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Transfer this request onto the hold queue to prevent it
> @@ -761,8 +802,7 @@ void __i915_sched_resume_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   	if (!i915_request_on_hold(rq))
>   		return;
>   
> -	ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "resuming request %llx:%lld\n",
> -		     rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno);
> +	SCHED_TRACE(se, "resuming request " RQ_FMT "\n", RQ_ARG(rq));
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Move this request back to the priority queue, and all of its
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> index 00ce0a9d519d..ebd93ae303b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,13 @@
>   struct drm_printer;
>   struct intel_engine_cs;
>   
> +#define SCHED_TRACE(se, fmt, ...) do {					\
> +	const struct i915_sched *se__ __maybe_unused = (se);		\
> +	GEM_TRACE("%s sched:%s: " fmt,					\
> +		  dev_name(se__->dbg.dev), se__->dbg.name,		\
> +		  ##__VA_ARGS__);					\
> +} while (0)
> +
>   #define priolist_for_each_request(it, plist) \
>   	list_for_each_entry(it, &(plist)->requests, sched.link)
>   
> @@ -36,7 +43,11 @@ int i915_sched_node_add_dependency(struct i915_sched_node *node,
>   
>   void i915_sched_node_retire(struct i915_sched_node *node);
>   
> -void i915_sched_init_ipi(struct i915_sched_ipi *ipi);
> +void i915_sched_init(struct i915_sched *se,
> +		     struct device *dev,
> +		     const char *name,
> +		     unsigned long mask,
> +		     unsigned int subclass);
>   
>   void i915_request_set_priority(struct i915_request *request, int prio);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
> index f2b0ac3a05a5..b7ee122d4f28 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
> @@ -14,10 +14,33 @@
>   
>   struct i915_request;
>   
> -/* Inter-engine scheduling delegation */
> -struct i915_sched_ipi {
> -	struct i915_request *list;
> -	struct work_struct work;
> +/**
> + * struct i915_sched - funnels requests towards hardware
> + *
> + * The struct i915_sched captures all the requests as they become ready
> + * to execute (on waking the i915_request.submit fence) puts them into
> + * a queue where they may be reordered according to priority and then
> + * wakes the backend tasklet to feed the queue to HW.
> + */
> +struct i915_sched {
> +	spinlock_t lock; /* protects the scheduling lists and queue */
> +
> +	unsigned long mask; /* available scheduling channels */
> +
> +	struct list_head requests; /* active request, on HW */
> +	struct list_head hold; /* ready requests, but on hold */
> +
> +	/* Inter-engine scheduling delegate */
> +	struct i915_sched_ipi {
> +		struct i915_request *list;
> +		struct work_struct work;
> +	} ipi;
> +
> +	/* Pretty device names for debug messages */
> +	struct {
> +		struct device *dev;
> +		const char *name;
> +	} dbg;
>   };
>   
>   struct i915_sched_attr {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_scheduler.c
> index 35a479184fee..b1a0a711e01f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_scheduler.c
> @@ -887,6 +887,7 @@ int i915_scheduler_perf_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   	} types[] = {
>   #define T(t) { #t, sizeof(struct t) }
>   		T(i915_priolist),
> +		T(i915_sched),
>   		T(i915_sched_attr),
>   		T(i915_sched_node),
>   		T(i915_dependency),
> 

Feels a sensible split between scheduling and physical engine.

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-04 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01  8:56 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/57] drm/i915/gt: Restrict the GT clock override to just Icelake Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/57] drm/i915/selftests: Exercise relative mmio paths to non-privileged registers Chris Wilson
2021-02-01 14:34   ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/57] drm/i915/selftests: Exercise cross-process context isolation Chris Wilson
2021-02-01 16:37   ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/57] drm/i915: Protect against request freeing during cancellation on wedging Chris Wilson
2021-02-02  9:55   ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/57] drm/i915: Take rcu_read_lock for querying fence's driver/timeline names Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 18:33   ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/57] drm/i915/gt: Always flush the submission queue on checking for idle Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/57] drm/i915/gt: Move engine setup out of set_default_submission Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 11:57   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/57] drm/i915/gt: Move submission_method into intel_gt Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 12:03   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-02 12:18     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/57] drm/i915: Replace engine->schedule() with a known request operation Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/57] drm/i915: Restructure priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/57] drm/i915/selftests: Measure set-priority duration Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/57] drm/i915/selftests: Exercise priority inheritance around an engine loop Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/57] drm/i915/selftests: Force a rewind if at first we don't succeed Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/57] drm/i915: Improve DFS for priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/57] drm/i915: Extract request submission from execlists Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/57] drm/i915: Extract request rewinding " Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 13:08   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/57] drm/i915: Extract request suspension from the execlists Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 13:15   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-02 13:26     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 13:32       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-02 13:27     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/57] drm/i915: Extract the ability to defer and rerun a request later Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 13:18   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/57] drm/i915: Fix the iterative dfs for defering requests Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 14:10   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/57] drm/i915: Wrap access to intel_engine.active Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 11:07   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 11:18     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 11:56       ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 12:08         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/57] drm/i915: Move common active lists from engine to i915_scheduler Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 11:12   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/57] drm/i915: Move scheduler queue Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 11:19   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 11:32     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 11:40     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/57] drm/i915: Move tasklet from execlists to sched Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 14:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/57] drm/i915/gt: Only kick the scheduler on timeslice/preemption change Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 14:09   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 14:43     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/57] drm/i915: Move submit_request to i915_sched_engine Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 14:13   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 14:45     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/57] drm/i915: Move finding the current active request to the scheduler Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 14:30   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 14:59     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/57] drm/i915: Show execlists queues when dumping state Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/57] drm/i915: Wrap i915_request_use_semaphores() Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:05   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/57] drm/i915: Move scheduler flags Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:14   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 16:05     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/57] drm/i915: Move timeslicing flag to scheduler Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:18   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 16:11     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-05  9:48       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/57] drm/i915/gt: Declare when we enabled timeslicing Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:26   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/57] drm/i915: Move needs-breadcrumb flags to scheduler Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:28   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 16:12     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/57] drm/i915: Move busywaiting control to the scheduler Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:32   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/57] drm/i915: Move preempt-reset flag " Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:34   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/57] drm/i915: Replace priolist rbtree with a skiplist Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/57] drm/i915: Wrap cmpxchg64 with try_cmpxchg64() helper Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/57] drm/i915: Fair low-latency scheduling Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/57] drm/i915/gt: Specify a deadline for the heartbeat Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/57] drm/i915: Extend the priority boosting for the display with a deadline Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/57] drm/i915/gt: Support virtual engine queues Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/57] drm/i915: Move saturated workload detection back to the context Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/57] drm/i915: Bump default timeslicing quantum to 5ms Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/57] drm/i915/gt: Delay taking irqoff for execlists submission Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/57] drm/i915/gt: Wrap intel_timeline.has_initial_breadcrumb Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/57] drm/i915/gt: Track timeline GGTT offset separately from subpage offset Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/57] drm/i915/gt: Add timeline "mode" Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/57] drm/i915/gt: Use indices for writing into relative timelines Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/57] drm/i915/selftests: Exercise relative timeline modes Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 49/57] drm/i915/gt: Use ppHWSP for unshared non-semaphore related timelines Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 50/57] Restore "drm/i915: drop engine_pin/unpin_breadcrumbs_irq" Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/57] drm/i915/gt: Couple tasklet scheduling for all CS interrupts Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 52/57] drm/i915/gt: Support creation of 'internal' rings Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 53/57] drm/i915/gt: Use client timeline address for seqno writes Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 54/57] drm/i915/gt: Infrastructure for ring scheduling Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 55/57] drm/i915/gt: Implement ring scheduler for gen4-7 Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 56/57] drm/i915/gt: Enable ring scheduling for gen5-7 Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 57/57] drm/i915: Support secure dispatch on gen6/gen7 Chris Wilson
2021-02-01 14:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/57] drm/i915/gt: Restrict the GT clock override to just Icelake Patchwork
2021-02-01 14:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 14:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/57] " Mika Kuoppala
2021-02-01 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [01/57] " Patchwork
2021-02-01 19:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=803964cf-3eb3-6eb7-c96c-fcf041781e23@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).