From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix i915_error_state_store error defination
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:13:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87muamgohj.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200117140552.GB3238@intel.intel>
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
>> >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>> >
>> > I've never been a fan of non human accounts, we had this discussion
>> > already in a different mailing list. Could you please find a
>> > different way of giving credit to your CI system?
>>
>> I don't actually mind for Reported-by credits. The history is full of
>> things like:
>>
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+ec24e95ea483de0a24da@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>
> That's just commit log unnecessary pollution, unwanted mail
> reference... no one will ever answer at lkp@intel.com, why
> reference it, then?
It's not about that, it's about giving credit to whom credit is due.
>> Care to reference the discussion?
>
> Here in the Samsung list we had a discussion with another Huawei
> developer about the Hulk Robot:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/4/635
Well, there's no consensus there either.
Again, if they want to use that Reported-by: line, I'm fine with it.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-17 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-17 7:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix i915_error_state_store error defination Zhang Xiaoxu
2020-01-17 12:15 ` Andi Shyti
2020-01-17 13:14 ` Jani Nikula
2020-01-17 14:05 ` Andi Shyti
2020-01-17 14:13 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-01-18 2:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87muamgohj.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=andi.shyti@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).