From: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 6/6] drm/i915/gem: Drop lru bumping on display unpinning
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 06:09:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPM=9tyZDmAzaj9RmkbHsvDuE4+s7FjUjPSk2uAaZHmDW1gewQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119214336.1463-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 07:43, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Simplify the frontbuffer unpin by removing the lock requirement. The LRU
> bumping was primarily to protect the GTT from being evicted and from
> frontbuffers being eagerly shrunk. Now we protect frontbuffers from the
> shrinker, and we avoid accidentally evicting from the GTT, so the
> benefit from bumping LRU is no more, and we can save more time by not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 7 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_overlay.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c | 45 --------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 1 -
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 32ff9d201aeb..2bd04e631eaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> */
> ret = i915_vma_pin_fence(vma);
> if (ret != 0 && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 4) {
> - i915_gem_object_unpin_from_display_plane(vma);
> + i915_vma_unpin(vma);
> vma = ERR_PTR(ret);
> goto err;
> }
> @@ -1448,12 +1448,9 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>
> void intel_unpin_fb_vma(struct i915_vma *vma, unsigned long flags)
> {
> - i915_gem_object_lock(vma->obj, NULL);
> if (flags & PLANE_HAS_FENCE)
> i915_vma_unpin_fence(vma);
> - i915_gem_object_unpin_from_display_plane(vma);
> - i915_gem_object_unlock(vma->obj);
> -
Why does this drop the locking here without explanation and without
reviewer comments?
Any patches from Chris that touch locking need vastly more review than
rubberstamps.
Dave.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 21:43 [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/6] drm/i915/gem: Almagamate clflushes on suspend Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 21:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/6] drm/i915/gem: Almagamate clflushes on freeze Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 21:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 3/6] drm/i915/gem: Move stolen node into GEM object union Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 21:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 4/6] drm/i915/gem: Use shrinkable status for unknown swizzle quirks Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 21:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 5/6] drm/i915/gem: Protect used framebuffers from casual eviction Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 21:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 6/6] drm/i915/gem: Drop lru bumping on display unpinning Chris Wilson
2021-02-08 20:09 ` Dave Airlie [this message]
2021-01-19 23:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,1/6] drm/i915/gem: Almagamate clflushes on suspend Patchwork
2021-01-19 23:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-01-20 15:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,1/6] drm/i915/gem: Almagamate clflushes on suspend (rev2) Patchwork
2021-01-20 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-20 17:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPM=9tyZDmAzaj9RmkbHsvDuE4+s7FjUjPSk2uAaZHmDW1gewQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).