Am 08.01.20 um 23:57 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On 1/8/20 2:17 PM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
>> Am 07.01.20 um 18:00 schrieb Jens Axboe:
>>> Sending this out separately, as I rebased it on top of the work.openat2
>>> branch from Al to resolve some of the conflicts with the differences in
>>> how open flags are built.
>>
>> Now that you rebased on top of openat2, wouldn't it be better to add
>> openat2 that to io_uring instead of the old openat call?
> 
> The IORING_OP_OPENAT already exists, so it would probably make more sense
> to add IORING_OP_OPENAT2 alongside that. Or I could just change it. Don't
> really feel that strongly about it, I'll probably just add openat2 and
> leave openat alone, openat will just be a wrapper around openat2 anyway.

Great, thanks!
metze