From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: io_uring: process task work in io_uring_register()
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 21:13:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez1i9pTYihJAd8sXC5BdP+5fLO-mcqDU1TdA2C3bKTXYCw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7ac4874-9c6c-4f41-653b-b5a664bfc843@canonical.com>
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 8:24 PM Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> Static analysis with Coverity has detected a "dead-code" issue with the
> following commit:
>
> commit af9c1a44f8dee7a958e07977f24ba40e3c770987
> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Date: Thu Sep 24 13:32:18 2020 -0600
>
> io_uring: process task work in io_uring_register()
>
> The analysis is as follows:
>
> 9513 do {
> 9514 ret =
> wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ctx->ref_comp);
>
> cond_const: Condition ret, taking false branch. Now the value of ret is
> equal to 0.
Does this mean Coverity is claiming that
wait_for_completion_interruptible() can't return non-zero values? If
so, can you figure out why Coverity thinks that? If that was true,
it'd sound like a core kernel bug, rather than a uring issue...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-08 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 18:23 io_uring: process task work in io_uring_register() Colin Ian King
2020-10-08 19:13 ` Jann Horn [this message]
2020-10-08 19:14 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-09 1:09 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAG48ez1i9pTYihJAd8sXC5BdP+5fLO-mcqDU1TdA2C3bKTXYCw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jannh@google.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).