kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tianlin Li <tli@digitalocean.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	David1.Zhou@amd.com, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/radeon: have the callers of set_memory_*() check the return value
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 10:04:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45CCBFCA-AACA-4C5E-B554-9E511872EAB9@digitalocean.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5984995-7276-97d3-a604-ddacfb89bd89@amd.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2206 bytes --]


> On Jan 8, 2020, at 6:56 AM, Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
> 
> Am 07.01.20 um 20:25 schrieb Tianlin Li:
>> Right now several architectures allow their set_memory_*() family of
>> functions to fail, but callers may not be checking the return values.
>> If set_memory_*() returns with an error, call-site assumptions may be
>> infact wrong to assume that it would either succeed or not succeed at
>> all. Ideally, the failure of set_memory_*() should be passed up the
>> call stack, and callers should examine the failure and deal with it.
>> 
>> Need to fix the callers and add the __must_check attribute. They also
>> may not provide any level of atomicity, in the sense that the memory
>> protections may be left incomplete on failure. This issue likely has a
>> few steps on effects architectures:
>> 1)Have all callers of set_memory_*() helpers check the return value.
>> 2)Add __must_check to all set_memory_*() helpers so that new uses do
>> not ignore the return value.
>> 3)Add atomicity to the calls so that the memory protections aren't left
>> in a partial state.
>> 
>> This series is part of step 1. Make drm/radeon check the return value of
>> set_memory_*().
> 
> I'm a little hesitate merge that. This hardware is >15 years old and nobody of the developers have any system left to test this change on.
> 
> Would it be to much of a problem to just add something like: r = set_memory_*(); (void)r; /* Intentionally ignored */.

Thank you. I will fix that in patch 1 and remove patch 2 (since no need to fix the call sites to handle the retval). 

Best regards,
Tianlin
> Apart from that certainly a good idea to add __must_check to the functions.
> 
> Regards,
> Christian.
> 
>> 
>> Tianlin Li (2):
>>   drm/radeon: have the callers of set_memory_*() check the return value
>>   drm/radeon: change call sites to handle return value properly.
>> 
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c        |  3 ++-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h      |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rs400.c       |  3 ++-
>>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9557 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-08 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-07 19:25 [PATCH 0/2] drm/radeon: have the callers of set_memory_*() check the return value Tianlin Li
2020-01-07 19:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Tianlin Li
2020-01-07 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/radeon: change call sites to handle return value properly Tianlin Li
2020-01-08 12:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] drm/radeon: have the callers of set_memory_*() check the return value Christian König
2020-01-08 16:04   ` Tianlin Li [this message]
2020-01-08 17:39   ` Kees Cook
2020-01-08 17:51     ` Alex Deucher
2020-01-09 10:15       ` Christian König
2020-01-09 10:49         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-01-09 20:16           ` Alex Deucher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45CCBFCA-AACA-4C5E-B554-9E511872EAB9@digitalocean.com \
    --to=tli@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=David1.Zhou@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).