From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>,
Adam Zabrocki <pi3@pi3.com.pl>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: Extend exec_id to 64bits
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 19:05:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whks0iE1f=Ka0_vo2PYg774P7FA8Y30YrOdUBGRH-ch9A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez1f82re_V=DzQuRHpy7wOWs1iixrah4GYYxngF1v-moZw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 6:36 PM Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
>
> Since the read is already protected by the tasklist_lock, an
> alternative might be to let the execve path also take that lock to
> protect the sequence number update,
No.
tasklist_lock is aboue the hottest lock there is in all of the kernel.
We're not doing stupid things for theoretical issues.
Stop this crazy argument.
A comment - sure. 64-bit atomics or very expensive locks? Not a chance.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-02 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 21:50 Curiosity around 'exec_id' and some problems associated with it Adam Zabrocki
2020-03-29 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2020-03-30 8:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-03-31 4:29 ` Adam Zabrocki
2020-04-01 20:47 ` [PATCH] signal: Extend exec_id to 64bits Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-01 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-01 21:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-01 23:37 ` Jann Horn
2020-04-01 23:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-01 23:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-02 1:35 ` Jann Horn
2020-04-02 2:05 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2020-04-02 13:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-02 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-02 4:46 ` Jann Horn
2020-04-02 14:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-04-03 2:11 ` Adam Zabrocki
2020-04-02 7:19 ` Kees Cook
2020-04-02 7:22 ` Bernd Edlinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=whks0iE1f=Ka0_vo2PYg774P7FA8Y30YrOdUBGRH-ch9A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pi3@pi3.com.pl \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).