From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 19:02:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/13] ASoC: Intel: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "sst_dma_free" Message-Id: <20150105190244.GD2634@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu" List-Id: References: <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <54A9355F.4050102@users.sourceforge.net> <54A93B5A.9050504@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <54A93B5A.9050504@users.sourceforge.net> To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: Jaroslav Kysela , Liam Girdwood , Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall --PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 02:08:42PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 19:03:55 +0100 >=20 > The sst_dma_free() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then > returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. Applied, thanks. --PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUqt/UAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQbzEH/2AfD0z7SEF1hyaG2XpkbGwp 3iLOAbTCG053WAJ9C0fJuwkewVKS0SrmiP6aiKW16k8OEG+sebPgaOtWKGU5w9xY aWon59S/QUgGBXJL44W46S/pTLuj3DVMKuzRbYpVNdxyYQl0xJqg/1/fsDitIY4A 3ULmylY77/2zK9AOJ5tquCmiXbIpyD9DbGuBbeQPyyxWhf3PUmJUi8VeekfzSckk zPImyBDWHEajvRwR4xHag3AD3x0eSmPhpfFWwAqztS6GnGHspVmagQLRxQJRGxBm C6//ImuyKc4H5gessBwByApMpSL8MikA9wfAyPEd/RjhCGuKLu/Z2APKvo34aN8= =gKx4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu--