From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:10:20 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sata_mv: More error handling for phy_power_off() in mv_platform_remove()
Message-Id: <20150203121020.GC19463@htj.dyndns.org>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251014170.2080@hadrien>
 <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251840450.7035@hadrien>
 <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402252117150.2047@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402262129250.2221@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net>
 <54D08732.4050601@users.sourceforge.net>
 <54D08871.6030304@users.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <54D08871.6030304@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>

On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 09:36:01AM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
...
> @@ -4215,7 +4215,9 @@ static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
>  			clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
>  		}
> -		phy_power_off(hpriv->port_phys[port]);
> +		rc = phy_power_off(hpriv->port_phys[port]);
> +		if (rc)
> +			return rc;

So, this is a removal function which is ignoring failure from turning
off phy, which seems like the right thing to do.  The same thing with
suspend routines.  If something auxliary which isn't strictly
necessary in reaching suspend state fails, the failure should be
ignored.

Running static code analysis to locate trivial irregularities and
performing identity transformations is fine, even great, but you're
changing the behavior here without actually understanding what's going
on.  Please don't do these things automatically.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun