From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:30:57 +0000 Subject: Re: s390/net: Deletion of unnecessary checks before two function calls Message-Id: <546A06A1.3060203@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <54687F1A.1010809@users.sourceforge.net> <20141116111023.GA4905@mwanda> <20141116111446.GA4956@mwanda> <54688F15.9070703@users.sourceforge.net> <20141117073408.GC4905@mwanda> <5469B836.8030507@users.sourceforge.net> <20141117134515.GE4905@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20141117134515.GE4905@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Coccinelle , Eric Paris , Frank Blaschka , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Ursula Braun , linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org > What do you want me to clarify? Do you still not see the bug? Would you like to point out that you notice the warning message "fsm: kfree_fsm called with NULL argument" after my update suggestion? How do you think about to share a bit more information about the corresponding function call graph from your test system? Regards, Markus