From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memstick: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:56:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFr5_MqtbXsk9JWf+oYSFW+uU+W4otq-hu+ZYKq_p+Bokw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6fe24f2372c8c627a08ace7187bfe60d35788b6.1629580314.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
On Sat, 21 Aug 2021 at 23:13, Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
>
> The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below.
> It has been compile tested.
>
> No memory allocation in involved in this patch, so no GFP_ tweak is needed.
>
> @@ @@
> - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
>
> @@ @@
> - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE
>
> @@ @@
> - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE
>
> @@ @@
> - PCI_DMA_NONE
> + DMA_NONE
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
> @@
> - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
> + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Applied for next, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
> https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
> ---
> drivers/memstick/host/r592.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c | 12 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c b/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c
> index 615a83782e55..7ed984360349 100644
> --- a/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c
> +++ b/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int r592_transfer_fifo_dma(struct r592_device *dev)
>
> /* TODO: hidden assumption about nenth beeing always 1 */
> sg_count = dma_map_sg(&dev->pci_dev->dev, &dev->req->sg, 1, is_write ?
> - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE : PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>
> if (sg_count != 1 || sg_dma_len(&dev->req->sg) < R592_LFIFO_SIZE) {
> message("problem in dma_map_sg");
> @@ -310,8 +310,7 @@ static int r592_transfer_fifo_dma(struct r592_device *dev)
> }
>
> dma_unmap_sg(&dev->pci_dev->dev, &dev->req->sg, 1, is_write ?
> - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE : PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> -
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>
> return dev->dma_error;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c b/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c
> index 57145374f6ac..c272453670be 100644
> --- a/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c
> +++ b/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c
> @@ -279,8 +279,8 @@ static int tifm_ms_issue_cmd(struct tifm_ms *host)
> if (host->use_dma) {
> if (1 != tifm_map_sg(sock, &host->req->sg, 1,
> host->req->data_dir == READ
> - ? PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> - : PCI_DMA_TODEVICE)) {
> + ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE
> + : DMA_TO_DEVICE)) {
> host->req->error = -ENOMEM;
> return host->req->error;
> }
> @@ -350,8 +350,8 @@ static void tifm_ms_complete_cmd(struct tifm_ms *host)
> if (host->use_dma) {
> tifm_unmap_sg(sock, &host->req->sg, 1,
> host->req->data_dir == READ
> - ? PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> - : PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE
> + : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> }
>
> writel((~TIFM_CTRL_LED) & readl(sock->addr + SOCK_CONTROL),
> @@ -607,8 +607,8 @@ static void tifm_ms_remove(struct tifm_dev *sock)
> if (host->use_dma)
> tifm_unmap_sg(sock, &host->req->sg, 1,
> host->req->data_dir == READ
> - ? PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
> - : PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + ? DMA_TO_DEVICE
> + : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> host->req->error = -ETIME;
>
> do {
> --
> 2.30.2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-21 21:13 [PATCH] memstick: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API Christophe JAILLET
2021-08-24 14:56 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPDyKFr5_MqtbXsk9JWf+oYSFW+uU+W4otq-hu+ZYKq_p+Bokw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=oakad@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).