kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig symbol clean-up on ./arch/x86/
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:32:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9074e8d-9314-9d7d-7bf5-5b5538c8be8d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210803113531.30720-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>

On 8/3/21 4:35 AM, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>   - a reference to STRICT_IOMEM in arch/x86/mm/init.c
>     unclear to me: which exact config this refers to

Are you referring to the reference in this comment?

> +       /*
> +        * This must follow RAM test, since System RAM is considered a
> +        * restricted resource under CONFIG_STRICT_IOMEM.
> +        */
> +       if (iomem_is_exclusive(pagenr << PAGE_SHIFT)) {
> +               /* Low 1MB bypasses iomem restrictions. */
> +               if (pagenr < 256)
> +                       return 1;
...

That came from here:

> commit a4866aa812518ed1a37d8ea0c881dc946409de94
> Author: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Date:   Wed Apr 5 09:39:08 2017 -0700
>
>     mm: Tighten x86 /dev/mem with zeroing reads

Which also added this hunk:

>  #ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM
> +static inline int page_is_allowed(unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> +       return devmem_is_allowed(pfn);
> +}

and talks about CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM in the changelog:

>     mm: Tighten x86 /dev/mem with zeroing reads
>     
>     Under CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM, reading System RAM through /dev/mem is
>     disallowed. However, on x86, the first 1MB was always allowed for BIOS
...

It's a pretty safe guess that STRICT_IOMEM refers to CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-03 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-03 11:35 [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig symbol clean-up on ./arch/x86/ Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/entry: correct reference to intended CONFIG_64_BIT Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86, olpc: correct condition to intended CONFIG_OLPC_XO15_SCI Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/Kconfig: correct reference to MWINCHIP3D Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/Kconfig: remove reference to obsolete MFD_INTEL_MSIC config Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/Kconfig: remove reference to obsolete APB_TIMER config Lukas Bulwahn
2021-10-05 19:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/irq: fix slightly wrong reference in comment Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/uaccess: adjust comment for endif of CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: page_32.h: adjust comment for endif of CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 11:35 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86: ia32.h: adjust comment for endif of CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION Lukas Bulwahn
2021-10-05 19:59   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-03 14:32 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2021-08-03 15:12   ` [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig symbol clean-up on ./arch/x86/ Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 15:40     ` Dave Hansen
2021-12-22 13:00       ` Lukas Bulwahn
2021-08-03 21:49 ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f9074e8d-9314-9d7d-7bf5-5b5538c8be8d@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkundrak@v3.sk \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).