kernel-tls-handshake.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anna Schumaker <schumaker.anna@gmail.com>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
Cc: anna.schumaker@netapp.com, trondmy@hammerspace.com,
	 Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,  kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 09/12] SUNRPC: Add RPC-with-TLS support to xprtsock.c
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 14:19:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFX2Jfn2epNz+OpMTD0yeTCjNNxTRR0rANp8+GHk7sLeVpUBhw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168426612899.74246.12074514989473589840.stgit@oracle-102.nfsv4bat.org>

Hi Chuck,

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 3:52 PM Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>
> Use the new TLS handshake API to enable the SunRPC client code
> to request a TLS handshake. This implements support for RFC 9289.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/sunrpc/xprtsock.h |    1
>  net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c           |  289 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprtsock.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprtsock.h
> index 574a6a5391ba..700a1e6c047c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprtsock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprtsock.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct sock_xprt {
>         struct work_struct      error_worker;
>         struct work_struct      recv_worker;
>         struct mutex            recv_mutex;
> +       struct completion       handshake_done;
>         struct sockaddr_storage srcaddr;
>         unsigned short          srcport;
>         int                     xprt_err;
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> index 7ea5984a52a3..686dd313f89f 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>  #include <net/udp.h>
>  #include <net/tcp.h>
>  #include <net/tls.h>
> +#include <net/handshake.h>
>
>  #include <linux/bvec.h>
>  #include <linux/highmem.h>
> @@ -189,6 +190,11 @@ static struct ctl_table xs_tunables_table[] = {
>   */
>  #define XS_IDLE_DISC_TO                (5U * 60 * HZ)
>
> +/*
> + * TLS handshake timeout.
> + */
> +#define XS_TLS_HANDSHAKE_TO    (10U * HZ)
> +
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)
>  # undef  RPC_DEBUG_DATA
>  # define RPCDBG_FACILITY       RPCDBG_TRANS
> @@ -1238,6 +1244,10 @@ static void xs_reset_transport(struct sock_xprt *transport)
>         if (atomic_read(&transport->xprt.swapper))
>                 sk_clear_memalloc(sk);
>
> +       /* XXX: Maybe also send a TLS Closure alert? */
> +
> +       tls_handshake_cancel(sk);
> +
>         kernel_sock_shutdown(sock, SHUT_RDWR);
>
>         mutex_lock(&transport->recv_mutex);
> @@ -2411,60 +2421,266 @@ static void xs_tcp_setup_socket(struct work_struct *work)
>         current_restore_flags(pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Transfer the connected socket to @upper_transport, then mark that
> + * xprt CONNECTED.
> + */
> +static int xs_tls_finish_connecting(struct rpc_xprt *lower_xprt,
> +                                   struct sock_xprt *upper_transport)
> +{
> +       struct sock_xprt *lower_transport =
> +                       container_of(lower_xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
> +       struct rpc_xprt *upper_xprt = &upper_transport->xprt;
> +
> +       if (!upper_transport->inet) {
> +               struct socket *sock = lower_transport->sock;
> +               struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> +
> +               /* Avoid temporary address, they are bad for long-lived
> +                * connections such as NFS mounts.
> +                * RFC4941, section 3.6 suggests that:
> +                *    Individual applications, which have specific
> +                *    knowledge about the normal duration of connections,
> +                *    MAY override this as appropriate.
> +                */
> +               if (xs_addr(upper_xprt)->sa_family == PF_INET6) {
> +                       ip6_sock_set_addr_preferences(sk,
> +                               IPV6_PREFER_SRC_PUBLIC);
> +               }
> +
> +               xs_tcp_set_socket_timeouts(upper_xprt, sock);
> +               tcp_sock_set_nodelay(sk);
> +
> +               lock_sock(sk);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * @sk is already connected, so it now has the RPC callbacks.
> +                * Reach into @lower_transport to save the original ones.
> +                */
> +               upper_transport->old_data_ready = lower_transport->old_data_ready;
> +               upper_transport->old_state_change = lower_transport->old_state_change;
> +               upper_transport->old_write_space = lower_transport->old_write_space;
> +               upper_transport->old_error_report = lower_transport->old_error_report;
> +               sk->sk_user_data = upper_xprt;
> +
> +               /* socket options */
> +               sock_reset_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER);
> +
> +               xprt_clear_connected(upper_xprt);
> +
> +               upper_transport->sock = sock;
> +               upper_transport->inet = sk;
> +               upper_transport->file = lower_transport->file;
> +
> +               release_sock(sk);
> +
> +               /* Reset lower_transport before shutting down its clnt */
> +               mutex_lock(&lower_transport->recv_mutex);
> +               lower_transport->inet = NULL;
> +               lower_transport->sock = NULL;
> +               lower_transport->file = NULL;
> +
> +               xprt_clear_connected(lower_xprt);
> +               xs_sock_reset_connection_flags(lower_xprt);
> +               xs_stream_reset_connect(lower_transport);
> +               mutex_unlock(&lower_transport->recv_mutex);
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!xprt_bound(upper_xprt))
> +               return -ENOTCONN;
> +
> +       xs_set_memalloc(upper_xprt);
> +
> +       if (!xprt_test_and_set_connected(upper_xprt)) {
> +               upper_xprt->connect_cookie++;
> +               clear_bit(XPRT_SOCK_CONNECTING, &upper_transport->sock_state);
> +               xprt_clear_connecting(upper_xprt);
> +
> +               upper_xprt->stat.connect_count++;
> +               upper_xprt->stat.connect_time += (long)jiffies -
> +                                          upper_xprt->stat.connect_start;
> +               xs_run_error_worker(upper_transport, XPRT_SOCK_WAKE_PENDING);
> +       }
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
> - * xs_tls_connect - establish a TLS session on a socket
> - * @work: queued work item
> + * xs_tls_handshake_done - TLS handshake completion handler
> + * @data: address of xprt to wake
> + * @status: status of handshake
> + * @peerid: serial number of key containing the remote's identity
>   *
>   */
> -static void xs_tls_connect(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void xs_tls_handshake_done(void *data, int status, key_serial_t peerid)
>  {
> -       struct sock_xprt *transport =
> -               container_of(work, struct sock_xprt, connect_worker.work);
> -       struct rpc_clnt *clnt;
> +       struct rpc_xprt *lower_xprt = data;
> +       struct sock_xprt *lower_transport =
> +                               container_of(lower_xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
>
> -       clnt = transport->clnt;
> -       transport->clnt = NULL;
> -       if (IS_ERR(clnt))
> -               goto out_unlock;
> +       lower_transport->xprt_err = status ? -EACCES : 0;
> +       complete(&lower_transport->handshake_done);
> +       xprt_put(lower_xprt);
> +}
>
> -       xs_tcp_setup_socket(work);
> +static int xs_tls_handshake_sync(struct rpc_xprt *lower_xprt, struct xprtsec_parms *xprtsec)
> +{
> +       struct sock_xprt *lower_transport =
> +                               container_of(lower_xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
> +       struct tls_handshake_args args = {
> +               .ta_sock        = lower_transport->sock,
> +               .ta_done        = xs_tls_handshake_done,
> +               .ta_data        = xprt_get(lower_xprt),
> +               .ta_peername    = lower_xprt->servername,

This part isn't compiling for me on v6.4-rc2:

net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c:2538:4: error: field designator 'ta_peername'
does not refer to any field in type 'struct tls_handshake_args'
                .ta_peername    = lower_xprt->servername,
                 ^
1 error generated.

Am I missing a patch, or did this struct get changed somewhere along the line?

Anna

> +       };
> +       struct sock *sk = lower_transport->inet;
> +       int rc;
>
> -       rpc_shutdown_client(clnt);
> +       init_completion(&lower_transport->handshake_done);
> +       set_bit(XPRT_SOCK_IGNORE_RECV, &lower_transport->sock_state);
>
> -out_unlock:
> -       return;
> +       lower_transport->xprt_err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +       switch (xprtsec->policy) {
> +       case RPC_XPRTSEC_TLS_ANON:
> +               rc = tls_client_hello_anon(&args, GFP_KERNEL);
> +               if (rc)
> +                       goto out_put_xprt;
> +               break;
> +       case RPC_XPRTSEC_TLS_X509:
> +               args.ta_my_cert = xprtsec->cert_serial;
> +               args.ta_my_privkey = xprtsec->privkey_serial;
> +               rc = tls_client_hello_x509(&args, GFP_KERNEL);
> +               if (rc)
> +                       goto out_put_xprt;
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               rc = -EACCES;
> +               goto out_put_xprt;
> +       }
> +
> +       rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&lower_transport->handshake_done,
> +                                                      XS_TLS_HANDSHAKE_TO);
> +       if (rc <= 0) {
> +               if (!tls_handshake_cancel(sk)) {
> +                       if (rc == 0)
> +                               rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +                       goto out_put_xprt;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       rc = lower_transport->xprt_err;
> +
> +out:
> +       xs_stream_reset_connect(lower_transport);
> +       clear_bit(XPRT_SOCK_IGNORE_RECV, &lower_transport->sock_state);
> +       return rc;
> +
> +out_put_xprt:
> +       xprt_put(lower_xprt);
> +       goto out;
>  }
>
> -static void xs_set_transport_clnt(struct rpc_clnt *clnt, struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> +/**
> + * xs_tls_connect - establish a TLS session on a socket
> + * @work: queued work item
> + *
> + * For RPC-with-TLS, there is a two-stage connection process.
> + *
> + * The "upper-layer xprt" is visible to the RPC consumer. Once it has
> + * been marked connected, the consumer knows that a TCP connection and
> + * a TLS session have been established.
> + *
> + * A "lower-layer xprt", created in this function, handles the mechanics
> + * of connecting the TCP socket, performing the RPC_AUTH_TLS probe, and
> + * then driving the TLS handshake. Once all that is complete, the upper
> + * layer xprt is marked connected.
> + */
> +static void xs_tls_connect(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> -       struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
> +       struct sock_xprt *upper_transport =
> +               container_of(work, struct sock_xprt, connect_worker.work);
> +       struct rpc_clnt *upper_clnt = upper_transport->clnt;
> +       struct rpc_xprt *upper_xprt = &upper_transport->xprt;
>         struct rpc_create_args args = {
> -               .net            = xprt->xprt_net,
> -               .protocol       = xprt->prot,
> -               .address        = (struct sockaddr *)&xprt->addr,
> -               .addrsize       = xprt->addrlen,
> -               .timeout        = clnt->cl_timeout,
> -               .servername     = xprt->servername,
> -               .nodename       = clnt->cl_nodename,
> -               .program        = clnt->cl_program,
> -               .prognumber     = clnt->cl_prog,
> -               .version        = clnt->cl_vers,
> +               .net            = upper_xprt->xprt_net,
> +               .protocol       = upper_xprt->prot,
> +               .address        = (struct sockaddr *)&upper_xprt->addr,
> +               .addrsize       = upper_xprt->addrlen,
> +               .timeout        = upper_clnt->cl_timeout,
> +               .servername     = upper_xprt->servername,
> +               .nodename       = upper_clnt->cl_nodename,
> +               .program        = upper_clnt->cl_program,
> +               .prognumber     = upper_clnt->cl_prog,
> +               .version        = upper_clnt->cl_vers,
>                 .authflavor     = RPC_AUTH_TLS,
> -               .cred           = clnt->cl_cred,
> +               .cred           = upper_clnt->cl_cred,
>                 .xprtsec        = {
>                         .policy         = RPC_XPRTSEC_NONE,
>                 },
> -               .flags          = RPC_CLNT_CREATE_NOPING,
>         };
> +       unsigned int pflags = current->flags;
> +       struct rpc_clnt *lower_clnt;
> +       struct rpc_xprt *lower_xprt;
> +       int status;
>
> -       switch (xprt->xprtsec.policy) {
> -       case RPC_XPRTSEC_TLS_ANON:
> -       case RPC_XPRTSEC_TLS_X509:
> -               transport->clnt = rpc_create(&args);
> -               break;
> -       default:
> -               transport->clnt = ERR_PTR(-ENOTCONN);
> +       if (atomic_read(&upper_xprt->swapper))
> +               current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
> +
> +       xs_stream_start_connect(upper_transport);
> +
> +       /* This implicitly sends an RPC_AUTH_TLS probe */
> +       lower_clnt = rpc_create(&args);
> +       if (IS_ERR(lower_clnt)) {
> +               clear_bit(XPRT_SOCK_CONNECTING, &upper_transport->sock_state);
> +               xprt_clear_connecting(upper_xprt);
> +               xprt_wake_pending_tasks(upper_xprt, PTR_ERR(lower_clnt));
> +               smp_mb__before_atomic();
> +               xs_run_error_worker(upper_transport, XPRT_SOCK_WAKE_PENDING);
> +               goto out_unlock;
>         }
> +
> +       /* RPC_AUTH_TLS probe was successful. Try a TLS handshake on
> +        * the lower xprt.
> +        */
> +       rcu_read_lock();
> +       lower_xprt = rcu_dereference(lower_clnt->cl_xprt);
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
> +       status = xs_tls_handshake_sync(lower_xprt, &upper_xprt->xprtsec);
> +       if (status)
> +               goto out_close;
> +
> +       status = xs_tls_finish_connecting(lower_xprt, upper_transport);
> +       if (status)
> +               goto out_close;
> +
> +       trace_rpc_socket_connect(upper_xprt, upper_transport->sock, 0);
> +       if (!xprt_test_and_set_connected(upper_xprt)) {
> +               upper_xprt->connect_cookie++;
> +               clear_bit(XPRT_SOCK_CONNECTING, &upper_transport->sock_state);
> +               xprt_clear_connecting(upper_xprt);
> +
> +               upper_xprt->stat.connect_count++;
> +               upper_xprt->stat.connect_time += (long)jiffies -
> +                                          upper_xprt->stat.connect_start;
> +               xs_run_error_worker(upper_transport, XPRT_SOCK_WAKE_PENDING);
> +       }
> +       rpc_shutdown_client(lower_clnt);
> +
> +out_unlock:
> +       current_restore_flags(pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
> +       upper_transport->clnt = NULL;
> +       xprt_unlock_connect(upper_xprt, upper_transport);
> +       return;
> +
> +out_close:
> +       rpc_shutdown_client(lower_clnt);
> +
> +       /* xprt_force_disconnect() wakes tasks with a fixed tk_status code.
> +        * Wake them first here to ensure they get our tk_status code.
> +        */
> +       xprt_wake_pending_tasks(upper_xprt, status);
> +       xs_tcp_force_close(upper_xprt);
> +       xprt_clear_connecting(upper_xprt);
> +       goto out_unlock;
>  }
>
>  /**
> @@ -2498,8 +2714,7 @@ static void xs_connect(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpc_task *task)
>         } else
>                 dprintk("RPC:       xs_connect scheduled xprt %p\n", xprt);
>
> -       xs_set_transport_clnt(task->tk_client, xprt);
> -
> +       transport->clnt = task->tk_client;
>         queue_delayed_work(xprtiod_workqueue,
>                         &transport->connect_worker,
>                         delay);
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-19 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-16 19:38 [PATCH RFC 00/12] client-side RPC-with-TLS Chuck Lever
2023-05-16 19:38 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] NFS: Improvements for fs_context-related tracepoints Chuck Lever
2023-05-16 19:39 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] SUNRPC: Plumb an API for setting transport layer security Chuck Lever
2023-05-16 19:39 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] SUNRPC: Trace the rpc_create_args Chuck Lever
2023-05-16 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] SUNRPC: Refactor rpc_call_null_helper() Chuck Lever
2023-05-22 20:35   ` Anna Schumaker
2023-05-22 20:41     ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-22 20:59     ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-22 21:21     ` [PATCH] SUNRPC: @clnt specifies auth flavor of RPC ping Chuck Lever
2023-05-23  2:37       ` Chuck Lever
2023-05-23  4:04         ` Trond Myklebust
2023-05-16 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] SUNRPC: Add RPC client support for the RPC_AUTH_TLS auth flavor Chuck Lever
2023-05-16 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] SUNRPC: Ignore data_ready callbacks during TLS handshakes Chuck Lever
2023-05-16 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] SUNRPC: Capture CMSG metadata on client-side receive Chuck Lever
2023-05-16 19:41 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] SUNRPC: Add a connect worker function for TLS Chuck Lever
2023-05-16 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] SUNRPC: Add RPC-with-TLS support to xprtsock.c Chuck Lever
2023-05-19 18:19   ` Anna Schumaker [this message]
2023-05-19 18:33     ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-19 18:50       ` Anna Schumaker
2023-05-16 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] SUNRPC: Add RPC-with-TLS tracepoints Chuck Lever
2023-05-16 19:43 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] NFS: Have struct nfs_client carry a TLS policy field Chuck Lever
2023-05-16 19:43 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] NFS: Add an "xprtsec=" NFS mount option Chuck Lever
2023-05-18 13:49 ` [PATCH RFC 00/12] client-side RPC-with-TLS Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFX2Jfn2epNz+OpMTD0yeTCjNNxTRR0rANp8+GHk7sLeVpUBhw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=schumaker.anna@gmail.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).