From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Documentation
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:53:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200609145353.628a342d@lwn.net> (raw)
The long process of converting the kernel's documentation into RST is
finally coming to an end...what has that bought us? We have gone from a
chaotic pile of incomplete, crufty, and un-integrated docs to a slightly
better organized pile of incomplete, crufty, slightly better integrated
docs. Plus we have the infrastructure to make something better from here.
What are the next steps for kernel documentation? What would we really
like our docs to look like, and how might we find the resources to get
them to that point? What sorts of improvements to the build
infrastructure would be useful? I'll come with some ideas (some of which
you've certainly heard before) but will be more interested in listening.
jon
_______________________________________________
Ksummit-discuss mailing list
Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-09 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-09 20:53 Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2020-06-10 8:49 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Documentation Dan Carpenter
2020-06-11 8:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-11 14:48 ` Linus Walleij
2020-06-11 18:03 ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-11 18:28 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-11 19:44 ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-12 8:18 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-06-12 9:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-12 10:58 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-12 15:48 ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-12 9:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-12 16:08 ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-13 16:42 ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-13 16:51 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-13 17:04 ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-14 13:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-14 14:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-15 9:46 ` Jani Nikula
2020-06-18 9:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-18 14:40 ` Joe Perches
[not found] ` <20200709122118.0ffaea91@coco.lan>
2020-07-09 11:42 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-09 12:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-09 16:59 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-09 17:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-09 17:57 ` Andrew Lunn
[not found] ` <104986.1594328429@turing-police>
2020-07-10 0:03 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-13 17:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-06-18 9:08 ` Mike Rapoport
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-12 14:54 Jonathan Corbet
2019-06-12 18:22 ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-12 19:12 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-06-12 19:43 ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-13 14:25 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-14 21:40 ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-15 0:05 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-17 10:12 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-17 17:21 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-12 20:33 ` Kate Stewart
2019-06-13 14:17 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-13 14:57 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-13 18:48 ` Greg KH
2019-06-13 19:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-20 18:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-20 19:28 ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-07-22 14:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200609145353.628a342d@lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).