From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDC8C32771 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27492468D for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Ynm/duSA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727050AbgARVmg (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:42:36 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:45032 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726960AbgARVmg (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:42:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579383755; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xHxqhDP0TufZsymD5aBLz6SOYSXcOXPtS6AtVTuad0M=; b=Ynm/duSAhH8iE5ROyKcA1PA8/Cj9yJYTMTqswMfbUcrR1ov5d6sQlhqBVxaRhDVX0pjdrF Ca9RNHOiorpkcbM16j0o/GB8GlKCvfxsY/MbsEBbjl8WfrmZKh3tfLH1mQgmgfETDBKLfO JP4Gg8bIARMowJF+Hw4oe7yJs3krEXw= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-342-WAZ5FbOXOvetjWoq4y9PDg-1; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:42:34 -0500 X-MC-Unique: WAZ5FbOXOvetjWoq4y9PDg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id i9so12139462wru.1 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:42:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xHxqhDP0TufZsymD5aBLz6SOYSXcOXPtS6AtVTuad0M=; b=M7QXdlrdzy7XUNiotjtsqNqXMEIE50IYbFKubzgXxfI1+5jcvMzDs4/NLEanS+YjRh a6lWtw6oFPpr8lp+TtF/WfYZuIf02zCkGsAoyuR/YSk4SFO+5zOlBTJZcejVQCLPiLcS DcpdHXhsbORKV6NoZofdwjr41n0+KVAKzzraZ139NcKWh8A+zs6o4VpkPLzrzR4+ipBP xjnRrba/fUfT6lwyVqbZgX4XpBEzsEAbnkZUqmULwSSyJoPst6E35m39I8dssViZ2Gn7 TD8rm9Px19g/xt+/GbXuwzyksFsZoWb9kqjxrSHCndbSnfsVqABbbbJuuoPjfcVVwmiT e9Tw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVX3U4LmlvzleMa6PsAugkJ2JpZAPfQzwa8uva7Ccx0NvA+pEP7 W+ADluOw+neetHr3Lemsr6ymrm51CmKnp/J3ETtV3mXeqSAa2zRtfwUYMrnGsQM+XeDtwMTrLq/ XhQg1cgOToClB X-Received: by 2002:adf:ff8a:: with SMTP id j10mr10039956wrr.312.1579383752264; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:42:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyGeL3j5AKbJYgQGL57uc9lh0LouWQB0ofIhLiYd3qtAYLWTK27fNDU66fBia4y4941qRHntg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ff8a:: with SMTP id j10mr10039941wrr.312.1579383752058; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:42:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:e0d6:d2cd:810b:30a9? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:e0d6:d2cd:810b:30a9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u84sm5122120wmg.10.2020.01.18.13.42.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:42:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls sanitization out of nested_enable_evmcs() To: Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: Liran Alon , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Kagan References: <20200115171014.56405-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20200115171014.56405-3-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20200115232738.GB18268@linux.intel.com> <877e1riy1o.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20200116161928.GC20561@linux.intel.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <0c3d32c1-7544-2370-f645-030bed55db83@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 22:42:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200116161928.GC20561@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 16/01/20 17:19, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Why not just do this in Qemu? IMO that's not a major ask, e.g. Qemu is > doing a decent amount of manual adjustment anyways. And Qemu isn't even > using the result of KVM_GET_MSRS so I don't think it's fair to say this is > solely KVM's fault. IMHO the features should stay available in case the guest chooses not to use eVMCS. A guest that uses eVMCS should know which features it cannot use and not enable them. Paolo