From: Santosh Shukla <sashukla@nvidia.com>
To: <maz@kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <james.morse@arm.com>, <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
<suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<cjia@nvidia.com>, Santosh Shukla <sashukla@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle the mmio faulting
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:46:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1603297010-18787-1-git-send-email-sashukla@nvidia.com> (raw)
The Commit:6d674e28 introduces a notion to detect and handle the
device mapping. The commit checks for the VM_PFNMAP flag is set
in vma->flags and if set then marks force_pte to true such that
if force_pte is true then ignore the THP function check
(/transparent_hugepage_adjust()).
There could be an issue with the VM_PFNMAP flag setting and checking.
For example consider a case where the mdev vendor driver register's
the vma_fault handler named vma_mmio_fault(), which maps the
host MMIO region in-turn calls remap_pfn_range() and maps
the MMIO's vma space. Where, remap_pfn_range implicitly sets
the VM_PFNMAP flag into vma->flags.
Now lets assume a mmio fault handing flow where guest first access
the MMIO region whose 2nd stage translation is not present.
So that results to arm64-kvm hypervisor executing guest abort handler,
like below:
kvm_handle_guest_abort() -->
user_mem_abort()--> {
...
0. checks the vma->flags for the VM_PFNMAP.
1. Since VM_PFNMAP flag is not yet set so force_pte _is_ false;
2. gfn_to_pfn_prot() -->
__gfn_to_pfn_memslot() -->
fixup_user_fault() -->
handle_mm_fault()-->
__do_fault() -->
vma_mmio_fault() --> // vendor's mdev fault handler
remap_pfn_range()--> // Here sets the VM_PFNMAP
flag into vma->flags.
3. Now that force_pte is set to false in step-2),
will execute transparent_hugepage_adjust() func and
that lead to Oops [4].
}
The proposition is to check is_iomap flag before executing the THP
function transparent_hugepage_adjust().
[4] THP Oops:
> pc: kvm_is_transparent_hugepage+0x18/0xb0
> ...
> ...
> user_mem_abort+0x340/0x9b8
> kvm_handle_guest_abort+0x248/0x468
> handle_exit+0x150/0x1b0
> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x778
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3c0/0x858
> ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb8
> __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38
Tested on Huawei Kunpeng Taishan-200 arm64 server, Using VFIO-mdev device.
Linux tip: 583090b1
Fixes: 6d674e28 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Properly handle faulting of device mappings")
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sashukla@nvidia.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 3d26b47..ff15357 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1947,7 +1947,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
* If we are not forced to use page mapping, check if we are
* backed by a THP and thus use block mapping if possible.
*/
- if (vma_pagesize == PAGE_SIZE && !force_pte)
+ if (vma_pagesize == PAGE_SIZE && !force_pte && !is_iomap(flags))
vma_pagesize = transparent_hugepage_adjust(memslot, hva,
&pfn, &fault_ipa);
if (writable)
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-21 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-21 16:16 Santosh Shukla [this message]
2020-10-23 11:29 ` [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle the mmio faulting Marc Zyngier
2021-04-21 2:59 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-04-21 6:20 ` Gavin Shan
2021-04-21 6:17 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-04-21 11:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-22 2:02 ` Gavin Shan
2021-04-22 6:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-22 7:36 ` Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)
2021-04-22 8:00 ` Santosh Shukla
2021-04-23 1:06 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-04-23 1:38 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1603297010-18787-1-git-send-email-sashukla@nvidia.com \
--to=sashukla@nvidia.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).