kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
	wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: chang.seok.bae@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	robert.hu@intel.com, Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/12] x86/cpufeature: Add CPUID.19H:{EBX,ECX} cpuid leaves
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:06:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1611565580-47718-3-git-send-email-robert.hu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1611565580-47718-1-git-send-email-robert.hu@linux.intel.com>

Though KeyLocker is generally enumerated by
CPUID.(07H,0):ECX.KL[bit23], CPUID.19H:{EBX,ECX} enumerate
more details of KeyLocker supporting status.

CPUID.19H:EBX
bit0 enumerates if OS (CR4.KeyLocker) and BIOS have enabled KeyLocker.
bit2 enumerates if wide Key Locker instructions are supported.
bit4 enumerates if IWKey backup is supported.
CPUID.19H:ECX
bit0 enumerates if the NoBackup parameter to LOADIWKEY is supported.
bit1 enumerates if IWKey randomization is supported.

Define these 2 cpuid_leafs so that get_cpu_cap() will have these
capabilities included, which will be the knowledge source of KVM on
host KeyLocker capabilities.

Most of above features don't have the necessity to appear in /proc/cpuinfo,
except "iwkey_rand", which we think might be interesting for user to easily
know if his system is using randomized IWKey.

Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h        |  6 ++++--
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h       | 11 ++++++++++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h |  2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c             |  7 +++++++
 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 59bf91c..f9fea5f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ enum cpuid_leafs
 	CPUID_7_ECX,
 	CPUID_8000_0007_EBX,
 	CPUID_7_EDX,
+	CPUID_19_EBX,
+	CPUID_19_ECX,
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_FEATURE_NAMES
@@ -89,7 +91,7 @@ enum cpuid_leafs
 	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 17, feature_bit) ||	\
 	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 18, feature_bit) ||	\
 	   REQUIRED_MASK_CHECK					  ||	\
-	   BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 19))
+	   BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 21))
 
 #define DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(feature_bit)				\
 	 ( CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK,  0, feature_bit) ||	\
@@ -112,7 +114,7 @@ enum cpuid_leafs
 	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 17, feature_bit) ||	\
 	   CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 18, feature_bit) ||	\
 	   DISABLED_MASK_CHECK					  ||	\
-	   BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 19))
+	   BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 21))
 
 #define cpu_has(c, bit)							\
 	(__builtin_constant_p(bit) && REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 1 :	\
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
index 8f2f050..d4a883a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 /*
  * Defines x86 CPU feature bits
  */
-#define NCAPINTS			19	   /* N 32-bit words worth of info */
+#define NCAPINTS			21	   /* N 32-bit words worth of info */
 #define NBUGINTS			1	   /* N 32-bit bug flags */
 
 /*
@@ -382,6 +382,15 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITIES	(18*32+30) /* "" IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES MSR */
 #define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD	(18*32+31) /* "" Speculative Store Bypass Disable */
 
+/* Intel-defined KeyLocker feature CPUID level 0x00000019 (EBX), word 20*/
+#define X86_FEATURE_KL_INS_ENABLED  (19*32 + 0) /* "" Key Locker instructions */
+#define X86_FEATURE_KL_WIDE  (19*32 + 2) /* "" Wide Key Locker instructions */
+#define X86_FEATURE_IWKEY_BACKUP  (19*32 + 4) /* "" IWKey backup */
+
+/* Intel-defined KeyLocker feature CPUID level 0x00000019 (ECX), word 21*/
+#define X86_FEATURE_IWKEY_NOBACKUP  (20*32 + 0) /* "" NoBackup parameter to LOADIWKEY */
+#define X86_FEATURE_IWKEY_RAND  (20*32 + 1) /* IWKey Randomization */
+
 /*
  * BUG word(s)
  */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
index 0ac9414..904baf8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
@@ -91,6 +91,6 @@
 			 DISABLE_ENQCMD|DISABLE_KEYLOCKER)
 #define DISABLED_MASK17	0
 #define DISABLED_MASK18	0
-#define DISABLED_MASK_CHECK BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 19)
+#define DISABLED_MASK_CHECK BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 21)
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_DISABLED_FEATURES_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h
index 3ff0d48..a165a16 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h
@@ -101,6 +101,6 @@
 #define REQUIRED_MASK16	0
 #define REQUIRED_MASK17	0
 #define REQUIRED_MASK18	0
-#define REQUIRED_MASK_CHECK BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 19)
+#define REQUIRED_MASK_CHECK BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 21)
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_REQUIRED_FEATURES_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 48881d8..ea46956 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -995,6 +995,13 @@ void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		c->x86_capability[CPUID_D_1_EAX] = eax;
 	}
 
+	/* Additional Intel-defined KeyLocker flags: level 0x00000019 */
+	if (c->cpuid_level >= 0x00000019) {
+		cpuid(0x00000019, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+		c->x86_capability[CPUID_19_EBX] = ebx;
+		c->x86_capability[CPUID_19_ECX] = ecx;
+	}
+
 	/* AMD-defined flags: level 0x80000001 */
 	eax = cpuid_eax(0x80000000);
 	c->extended_cpuid_level = eax;
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-26  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-25  9:06 [RFC PATCH 00/12] KVM: Support Intel KeyLocker Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] x86/keylocker: Move LOADIWKEY opcode definition from keylocker.c to keylocker.h Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` Robert Hoo [this message]
2021-04-05 15:32   ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] x86/cpufeature: Add CPUID.19H:{EBX,ECX} cpuid leaves Sean Christopherson
2021-04-06  3:34     ` Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] kvm/vmx: Introduce the new tertiary processor-based VM-execution controls Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:41   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-01-26  9:27     ` Robert Hoo
2021-02-03  6:32     ` Robert Hoo
2021-02-03  8:45       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-04-05 15:38   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-06  3:37     ` Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] kvm/vmx: enable LOADIWKEY vm-exit support in " Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] kvm/vmx: Add KVM support on KeyLocker operations Robert Hoo
2021-04-05 16:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-08  5:44     ` Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] kvm/cpuid: Enumerate KeyLocker feature in KVM Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] kvm/vmx/nested: Support new IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS3 vmx feature control MSR Robert Hoo
2021-04-05 15:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-08  5:45     ` Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] kvm/vmx: Refactor vmx_compute_tertiary_exec_control() Robert Hoo
2021-04-05 15:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-08  5:45     ` Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] kvm/vmx/vmcs12: Add Tertiary Exec-Control field in vmcs12 Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] kvm/vmx/nested: Support tertiary VM-Exec control in vmcs02 Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] kvm/vmx/nested: Support CR4.KL in nested Robert Hoo
2021-01-25  9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] kvm/vmx/nested: Enable nested LOADIWKey VM-exit Robert Hoo
2021-04-05 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] KVM: Support Intel KeyLocker Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1611565580-47718-3-git-send-email-robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).