Re: [PATCH RFC 03/15] KVM: Add build-time error check on kvm_run size

[Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>]

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 04:34:53PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> It's already going to reach 2400 Bytes (which is over half of page
> size on 4K page archs), so maybe it's good to have this build-time
> check in case it overflows when adding new fields.

Please explain why exceeding PAGE_SIZE is a bad thing.  I realize it's
almost absurdly obvious when looking at the code, but a) the patch itself
does not provide that context and b) the changelog should hold up on its
own, e.g. in a mostly hypothetical case where the allocation of vcpu->run
were changed to something else.

> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 8f8940cc4b84..681452d288cd 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -352,6 +352,8 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id)
>  	}
>  	vcpu->run = page_address(page);
>  
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct kvm_run) > PAGE_SIZE);
> +
>  	kvm_vcpu_set_in_spin_loop(vcpu, false);
>  	kvm_vcpu_set_dy_eligible(vcpu, false);
>  	vcpu->preempted = false;
> -- 
> 2.21.0
>