From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 4/4] s390x: SCLP unit test
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:05:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200113150504.3fd218d5@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22b5ce6a-18af-edec-efc6-e03450faddf8@redhat.com>
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:10:10 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> :) I'm confused by the fact that you "expect_pgm_int()" but actually
> don't expect one ...
>
> Please enlighten me why this isn't
>
> + sclp_mark_busy();
> + h->length = 8;
> + sclp_setup_int();
> +
> + asm volatile(
> + " .insn rre,0xb2204200,%1,%2\n" /* servc
> %1,%2 */
> + " ipm %0\n"
> + " srl %0,28"
> + : "=&d" (cc) : "d" (valid_code), "a" (__pa(pagebuf))
> + : "cc", "memory");
> + if (!cc)
> + sclp_wait_busy();
> + report(cc == 0, "Instruction format ignored bits");
>
> I feel like I am missing something important.
because if we take an unexpected pgm interrupt:
* the interrupt handler will write stuff on the console using SCLP
* it will wait for the busy flag to be cleared before doing so
* thus it will hang.
this would be solved by adding special logic to the pgm interrupt
handler (as we have discussed in your previous email)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-13 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-10 18:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/4] s390x: SCLP Unit test Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 1/4] s390x: export sclp_setup_int Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/4] s390x: sclp: add service call instruction wrapper Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 3/4] s390x: lib: add SPX and STPX " Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 9:42 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-13 12:27 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 10:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-10 18:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 4/4] s390x: SCLP unit test Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 11:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 12:33 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 12:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 12:58 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 13:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 14:05 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2020-01-13 14:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 15:24 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-13 16:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 16:17 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-15 9:57 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200113150504.3fd218d5@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).