From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/4] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:30:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200114153054.77082-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114153054.77082-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Let's remove a lot of badly formatted code by introducing the
wait_for_flag() function.
Also let's remove some stray spaces.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/smp.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
index ab7e46c..4dee43e 100644
--- a/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/s390x/smp.c
@@ -22,6 +22,13 @@
static int testflag = 0;
+static void wait_for_flag(void)
+{
+ while (!testflag) {
+ mb();
+ }
+}
+
static void cpu_loop(void)
{
for (;;) {}
@@ -37,13 +44,11 @@ static void test_func(void)
static void test_start(void)
{
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
- while (!testflag) {
- mb();
- }
+ wait_for_flag();
report(1, "start");
}
@@ -115,24 +120,24 @@ static void ecall(void)
testflag = 1;
while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1202) { mb(); }
report(1, "ecall");
- testflag= 1;
+ testflag = 1;
}
static void test_ecall(void)
{
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)ecall;
report_prefix_push("ecall");
- testflag= 0;
+ testflag = 0;
smp_cpu_destroy(1);
smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
- while (!testflag) { mb(); }
- testflag= 0;
+ wait_for_flag();
+ testflag = 0;
sigp(1, SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0, NULL);
- while(!testflag) {mb();}
+ wait_for_flag();
smp_cpu_stop(1);
report_prefix_pop();
}
@@ -147,7 +152,7 @@ static void emcall(void)
mask = extract_psw_mask();
mask |= PSW_MASK_EXT;
load_psw_mask(mask);
- testflag= 1;
+ testflag = 1;
while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1201) { mb(); }
report(1, "ecall");
testflag = 1;
@@ -156,18 +161,18 @@ static void emcall(void)
static void test_emcall(void)
{
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)emcall;
report_prefix_push("emcall");
- testflag= 0;
+ testflag = 0;
smp_cpu_destroy(1);
smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
- while (!testflag) { mb(); }
- testflag= 0;
+ wait_for_flag();
+ testflag = 0;
sigp(1, SIGP_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, NULL);
- while(!testflag) { mb(); }
+ wait_for_flag();
smp_cpu_stop(1);
report_prefix_pop();
}
@@ -177,7 +182,7 @@ static void test_reset_initial(void)
struct cpu_status *status = alloc_pages(0);
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
report_prefix_push("reset initial");
@@ -208,7 +213,7 @@ static void test_reset(void)
{
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
report_prefix_push("cpu reset");
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-14 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-14 15:30 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/4] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks Janosch Frank
2020-01-14 15:30 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-01-14 15:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/4] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c Thomas Huth
2020-01-14 17:32 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-14 15:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/4] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once Janosch Frank
2020-01-14 16:45 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-15 7:50 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-14 17:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-15 9:00 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-14 15:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/4] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-01-14 17:01 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-14 17:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-14 18:42 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-01-15 6:17 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-15 7:57 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-15 8:11 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-14 15:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank
2020-01-14 17:22 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-14 17:53 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-15 10:47 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/4] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks David Hildenbrand
2020-01-15 13:03 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200114153054.77082-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).