kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
	Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls sanitization out of nested_enable_evmcs()
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:10:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200115171014.56405-3-vkuznets@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200115171014.56405-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>

With fine grained VMX feature enablement QEMU>=4.2 tries to do KVM_SET_MSRS
with default (matching CPU model) values and in case eVMCS is also enabled,
fails.

It would be possible to drop VMX feature filtering completely and make
this a guest's responsibility: if it decides to use eVMCS it should know
which fields are available and which are not. Hyper-V mostly complies to
this, however, there is at least one problematic control:
SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES
which Hyper-V enables. As there is no 'apic_addr_field' in eVMCS, we
fail to handle this properly in KVM. It is unclear how this is supposed
to work, genuine Hyper-V doesn't expose the control so it is possible that
this is just a bug (in Hyper-V).

Move VMX controls sanitization from nested_enable_evmcs() to vmx_get_msr(),
this allows userspace to keep setting controls it wants and at the same
time hides them from the guest.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c   | 10 ++++++++--
 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
index 89c3e0caf39f..b5d6582ba589 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
@@ -346,6 +346,38 @@ uint16_t nested_get_evmcs_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        return 0;
 }
 
+void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata)
+{
+	u32 ctl_low = (u32)*pdata, ctl_high = (u32)(*pdata >> 32);
+	/*
+	 * Enlightened VMCS doesn't have certain fields, make sure we don't
+	 * expose unsupported controls to L1.
+	 */
+
+	switch (msr_index) {
+	case MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS:
+	case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PINBASED_CTLS:
+		ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL;
+		break;
+	case MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS:
+	case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_EXIT_CTLS:
+		ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL;
+		break;
+	case MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS:
+	case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_ENTRY_CTLS:
+		ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL;
+		break;
+	case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2:
+		ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC;
+		break;
+	case MSR_IA32_VMX_VMFUNC:
+		ctl_low &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	*pdata = ctl_low | ((u64)ctl_high << 32);
+}
+
 int nested_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			uint16_t *vmcs_version)
 {
@@ -356,11 +388,5 @@ int nested_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (vmcs_version)
 		*vmcs_version = nested_get_evmcs_version(vcpu);
 
-	vmx->nested.msrs.pinbased_ctls_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL;
-	vmx->nested.msrs.entry_ctls_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL;
-	vmx->nested.msrs.exit_ctls_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL;
-	vmx->nested.msrs.secondary_ctls_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC;
-	vmx->nested.msrs.vmfunc_controls &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC;
-
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h
index 07ebf6882a45..b88d9807a796 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h
@@ -201,5 +201,6 @@ bool nested_enlightened_vmentry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *evmcs_gpa);
 uint16_t nested_get_evmcs_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int nested_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			uint16_t *vmcs_version);
+void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata);
 
 #endif /* __KVM_X86_VMX_EVMCS_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index e3394c839dea..8eb74618b8d8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1849,8 +1849,14 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 	case MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC ... MSR_IA32_VMX_VMFUNC:
 		if (!nested_vmx_allowed(vcpu))
 			return 1;
-		return vmx_get_vmx_msr(&vmx->nested.msrs, msr_info->index,
-				       &msr_info->data);
+		if (vmx_get_vmx_msr(&vmx->nested.msrs, msr_info->index,
+				    &msr_info->data))
+			return 1;
+		if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
+		    vmx->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled)
+			nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(msr_info->index,
+							&msr_info->data);
+		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL:
 		if (pt_mode != PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST)
 			return 1;
-- 
2.24.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-15 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-15 17:10 [PATCH RFC 0/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: fix enlightened VMCS & QEMU4.2 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-15 17:10 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: remove stale evmcs_already_enabled check from nested_enable_evmcs() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-15 22:50   ` Liran Alon
2020-01-15 17:10 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2020-01-15 22:49   ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls sanitization out of nested_enable_evmcs() Liran Alon
2020-01-16  8:37     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-03 15:11       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-15 23:27   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-15 23:30     ` Liran Alon
2020-01-16  8:51       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-16 16:19         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-16 16:57           ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-17  6:31             ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-18 21:42           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-19  8:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-22  5:47     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-22  9:37       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-22 14:33       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-22 15:08         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-22 15:51           ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-22 16:29             ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-22 16:40               ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-23  9:15                 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-23 19:09                   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-24 17:25                     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-27 15:38                       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-27 17:53                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-27 21:52                           ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-27 18:17                         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-15 17:10 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: don't allow to turn on unsupported VMX controls for nested guests Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-15 22:59   ` Liran Alon
2020-01-16  8:55     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-16 16:21       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-19  8:57         ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200115171014.56405-3-vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkagan@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).