From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"tiwei.bie@intel.com" <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"cunming.liang@intel.com" <cunming.liang@intel.com>,
"zhihong.wang@intel.com" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>,
"rob.miller@broadcom.com" <rob.miller@broadcom.com>,
"xiao.w.wang@intel.com" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
"haotian.wang@sifive.com" <haotian.wang@sifive.com>,
"lingshan.zhu@intel.com" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>,
"eperezma@redhat.com" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"lulu@redhat.com" <lulu@redhat.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>,
"kevin.tian@intel.com" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"stefanha@redhat.com" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"rdunlap@infradead.org" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"aadam@redhat.com" <aadam@redhat.com>,
"jakub.kicinski@netronome.com" <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
"hanand@xilinx.com" <hanand@xilinx.com>,
"mhabets@solarflare.com" <mhabets@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] vdpasim: vDPA device simulator
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:47:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200116154658.GJ20978@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116124231.20253-6-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 08:42:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> This patch implements a software vDPA networking device. The datapath
> is implemented through vringh and workqueue. The device has an on-chip
> IOMMU which translates IOVA to PA. For kernel virtio drivers, vDPA
> simulator driver provides dma_ops. For vhost driers, set_map() methods
> of vdpa_config_ops is implemented to accept mappings from vhost.
>
> A sysfs based management interface is implemented, devices are
> created and removed through:
>
> /sys/devices/virtual/vdpa_simulator/netdev/{create|remove}
This is very gross, creating a class just to get a create/remove and
then not using the class for anything else? Yuk.
> Netlink based lifecycle management could be implemented for vDPA
> simulator as well.
This is just begging for a netlink based approach.
Certainly netlink driven removal should be an agreeable standard for
all devices, I think.
> +struct vdpasim_virtqueue {
> + struct vringh vring;
> + struct vringh_kiov iov;
> + unsigned short head;
> + bool ready;
> + u64 desc_addr;
> + u64 device_addr;
> + u64 driver_addr;
> + u32 num;
> + void *private;
> + irqreturn_t (*cb)(void *data);
> +};
> +
> +#define VDPASIM_QUEUE_ALIGN PAGE_SIZE
> +#define VDPASIM_QUEUE_MAX 256
> +#define VDPASIM_DEVICE_ID 0x1
> +#define VDPASIM_VENDOR_ID 0
> +#define VDPASIM_VQ_NUM 0x2
> +#define VDPASIM_CLASS_NAME "vdpa_simulator"
> +#define VDPASIM_NAME "netdev"
> +
> +u64 vdpasim_features = (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) |
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) |
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
Is not using static here intentional?
> +static void vdpasim_release_dev(struct device *_d)
> +{
> + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = dev_to_vdpa(_d);
> + struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
> +
> + sysfs_remove_link(vdpasim_dev->devices_kobj, vdpasim->name);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vsim_list_lock);
> + list_del(&vdpasim->next);
> + mutex_unlock(&vsim_list_lock);
> +
> + kfree(vdpasim->buffer);
> + kfree(vdpasim);
> +}
It is again a bit weird to see a realease function in a driver. This
stuff is usually in the remove remove function.
> +static int vdpasim_create(const guid_t *uuid)
> +{
> + struct vdpasim *vdpasim, *tmp;
> + struct virtio_net_config *config;
> + struct vdpa_device *vdpa;
> + struct device *dev;
> + int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vsim_list_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &vsim_devices_list, next) {
> + if (guid_equal(&tmp->uuid, uuid)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&vsim_list_lock);
> + return -EEXIST;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + vdpasim = kzalloc(sizeof(*vdpasim), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vdpasim)
> + goto err_vdpa_alloc;
> +
> + vdpasim->buffer = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vdpasim->buffer)
> + goto err_buffer_alloc;
> +
> + vdpasim->iommu = vhost_iotlb_alloc(2048, 0);
> + if (!vdpasim->iommu)
> + goto err_iotlb;
> +
> + config = &vdpasim->config;
> + config->mtu = 1500;
> + config->status = VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
> + eth_random_addr(config->mac);
> +
> + INIT_WORK(&vdpasim->work, vdpasim_work);
> + spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->lock);
> +
> + guid_copy(&vdpasim->uuid, uuid);
> +
> + list_add(&vdpasim->next, &vsim_devices_list);
> + vdpa = &vdpasim->vdpa;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&vsim_list_lock);
> +
> + vdpa = &vdpasim->vdpa;
> + vdpa->config = &vdpasim_net_config_ops;
> + vdpa_set_parent(vdpa, &vdpasim_dev->dev);
> + vdpa->dev.release = vdpasim_release_dev;
> +
> + vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[0].vring, vdpasim->iommu);
> + vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[1].vring, vdpasim->iommu);
> +
> + dev = &vdpa->dev;
> + dev->coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
> + set_dma_ops(dev, &vdpasim_dma_ops);
> +
> + ret = register_vdpa_device(vdpa);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_register;
> +
> + sprintf(vdpasim->name, "%pU", uuid);
>+
> + ret = sysfs_create_link(vdpasim_dev->devices_kobj, &vdpa->dev.kobj,
> + vdpasim->name);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_link;
The goto err_link does the wrong unwind, once register is completed
the error unwind is unregister & put_device, not kfree. This is why I
recommend to always initalize the device early, and always using
put_device during error unwinds.
This whole guid thing seems unncessary when the device is immediately
assigned a vdpa index from the ida. If you were not using syfs you'd
just return that index from the creation netlink.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 12:42 [PATCH 0/5] vDPA support Jason Wang
2020-01-16 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] vhost: factor out IOTLB Jason Wang
2020-01-17 4:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-01-17 9:34 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-18 0:01 ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-18 0:40 ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-16 12:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] vringh: IOTLB support Jason Wang
2020-01-17 21:54 ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-17 22:33 ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-16 12:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus Jason Wang
2020-01-16 15:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-17 3:03 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-17 13:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-20 7:50 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-20 12:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-20 17:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-20 21:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-21 14:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-21 14:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-21 14:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-21 8:40 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-01-21 9:41 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-17 4:16 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-01-17 9:34 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-17 12:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-17 13:52 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <CAJPjb1+fG9L3=iKbV4Vn13VwaeDZZdcfBPvarogF_Nzhk+FnKg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-01-19 9:07 ` Shahaf Shuler
2020-01-19 9:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-20 8:44 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-20 12:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-21 3:32 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-20 8:43 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-20 17:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-20 20:51 ` Shahaf Shuler
2020-01-20 21:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-20 21:47 ` Shahaf Shuler
2020-01-20 21:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-21 6:01 ` Shahaf Shuler
2020-01-21 7:57 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-21 14:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-21 14:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-20 21:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-21 4:00 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-21 5:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-21 8:00 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-21 8:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-21 8:35 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-21 11:09 ` Shahaf Shuler
2020-01-22 6:36 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-21 14:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-21 14:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-22 6:18 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-20 8:19 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-16 12:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] virtio: introduce a vDPA based transport Jason Wang
2020-01-16 15:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-17 9:32 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-17 14:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-20 7:52 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-17 4:10 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-01-16 12:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] vdpasim: vDPA device simulator Jason Wang
2020-01-16 15:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-01-17 9:32 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-17 14:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-20 8:01 ` Jason Wang
2020-02-04 4:19 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-17 4:12 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-01-17 9:35 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-18 18:18 ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-28 3:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-02-04 4:07 ` Jason Wang
2020-02-04 8:21 ` Zhu Lingshan
2020-02-04 8:28 ` Jason Wang
2020-02-04 12:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-02-05 3:14 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-21 8:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] vDPA support Tian, Kevin
2020-01-21 9:39 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200116154658.GJ20978@mellanox.com \
--to=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=aadam@redhat.com \
--cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hanand@xilinx.com \
--cc=haotian.wang@sifive.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mhabets@solarflare.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parav@mellanox.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rob.miller@broadcom.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).