kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] vfio-ccw: Indicate if a channel_program is started
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 01:11:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618011109.294a972d.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616195053.99253-2-farman@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:50:51 +0200
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> The interrupt path checks the FSM state when processing a final interrupt
> (an interrupt that is neither subchannel active, nor device active),
> to determine whether to call cp_free() and release the associated memory.
> But, this does not fully close the window where a START comes in after a
> HALT/CLEAR. If the START runs while the CLEAR interrupt is being processed,
> the channel program struct will be allocated while the interrupt would be
> considering whether or not to free it. If the FSM state is CP_PROCESSING,
> then everything is fine. But if the START is able to issue its SSCH and get
> a cc0, then the in-flight interrupt would have been for an unrelated
> operation (perhaps none, if the subchannel was previously idle).
> 
> The channel_program struct has an "initialized" flag that is set early
> in the fsm_io_request() flow, to simplify the various cp_*() accessors.
> Let's extend this idea to include a "started" flag that announces that the
> channel program has successfully been issued to hardware. With this, the
> interrupt path can determine whether the final interrupt should also
> release the cp resources instead of relying on a transient FSM state.

AFAICT cp->started is potentially accessed by multiple threads, form
which at least one writes. Am I right?

Actually AFAICT you want to use cp->sarted for synchronization between
multiple treads (I/O requester(s), IRQ handler(s)). How does the
synchronization work for bool started itself, i.e. don't we have a data
race on 'started'?

A side note: I know, I asked a similar question about 'initialized' back
then.

Regards,
Halil

> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c  |  2 ++
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h  |  1 +
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> index b9febc581b1f..7748eeef434e 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> @@ -657,6 +657,7 @@ int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev, union orb *orb)
>  
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		cp->initialized = true;
> +		cp->started = false;
>  
>  		/* It is safe to force: if it was not set but idals used
>  		 * ccwchain_calc_length would have returned an error.
> @@ -685,6 +686,7 @@ void cp_free(struct channel_program *cp)
>  		return;
>  
>  	cp->initialized = false;
> +	cp->started = false;
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, temp, &cp->ccwchain_list, next) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < chain->ch_len; i++) {
>  			pfn_array_unpin_free(chain->ch_pa + i, cp->mdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
> index ba31240ce965..7ea14910aaaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct channel_program {
>  	union orb orb;
>  	struct device *mdev;
>  	bool initialized;
> +	bool started;
>  	struct ccw1 *guest_cp;
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> index 8c625b530035..7e2a790dc9a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work)
>  		     (SCSW_ACTL_DEVACT | SCSW_ACTL_SCHACT));
>  	if (scsw_is_solicited(&irb->scsw)) {
>  		cp_update_scsw(&private->cp, &irb->scsw);
> -		if (is_final && private->state == VFIO_CCW_STATE_CP_PENDING)
> +		if (is_final && private->cp.started)
>  			cp_free(&private->cp);
>  	}
>  	mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
> index 23e61aa638e4..d806f88eba72 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static int fsm_io_helper(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
>  		sch->schib.scsw.cmd.actl |= SCSW_ACTL_START_PEND;
>  		ret = 0;
>  		private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_CP_PENDING;
> +		private->cp.started = true;
>  		break;
>  	case 1:		/* Status pending */
>  	case 2:		/* Busy */
> @@ -246,6 +247,16 @@ static void fsm_io_request(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
>  	char *errstr = "request";
>  	struct subchannel_id schid = get_schid(private);
>  
> +	if (private->cp.started) {
> +		io_region->ret_code = -EBUSY;
> +		VFIO_CCW_MSG_EVENT(2,
> +				   "%pUl (%x.%x.%04x): busy\n",
> +				   mdev_uuid(mdev), schid.cssid,
> +				   schid.ssid, schid.sch_no);
> +		errstr = "busy";
> +		goto err_out;
> +	}
> +
>  	private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_CP_PROCESSING;
>  	memcpy(scsw, io_region->scsw_area, sizeof(*scsw));
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-17 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-16 19:50 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-ccw: Fix interrupt handling for HALT/CLEAR Eric Farman
2020-06-16 19:50 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] vfio-ccw: Indicate if a channel_program is started Eric Farman
2020-06-17 23:11   ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2020-06-18 11:47     ` Eric Farman
2020-06-16 19:50 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] vfio-ccw: Remove the CP_PENDING FSM state Eric Farman
2020-06-16 19:50 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] vfio-ccw: Check workqueue before doing START Eric Farman
2020-06-19 11:40   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-17 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-ccw: Fix interrupt handling for HALT/CLEAR Eric Farman
2020-06-29 14:56   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-30 19:10     ` Eric Farman
2020-06-19 11:21 ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200618011109.294a972d.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).