From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F72C2D0A3 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF9F2224A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="XEpcAbje" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1786636AbgJZQyT (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:54:19 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:55873 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1786625AbgJZQyQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:54:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603731255; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wLEKZXx53bC/AXofQXHwBHnCSy+NkKOX2yE9+4TERTk=; b=XEpcAbje/9DlFiVKVZFg+yoz6FBDUbCxM8x/m+SSfvAKVdMPpFrxeTJSVvKkFIV+XFXWjw 0PoP1GR+mpa/6IrawOvtiObpiCLB65i7l8snMDRjnB2ou/3hjKOT7O+nNFGQtoNk1sGYHr 89d7Mgze88agg8HR2QBbfz1g6fshT6I= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-312-6gZAGOtrPBiQoHan6C7dTA-1; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:54:11 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6gZAGOtrPBiQoHan6C7dTA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF78B1009E27; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from w520.home (ovpn-112-213.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.213]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01445D9E4; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:53:54 -0600 From: Alex Williamson To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Matthew Rosato , thuth@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net, david@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] s390x/pci: s390-pci updates for kernel 5.10-rc1 Message-ID: <20201026105354.703fc480@w520.home> In-Reply-To: <20201026174124.1a662fa3.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <1603726481-31824-1-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> <20201026171947.0f302dcc.cohuck@redhat.com> <20201026174124.1a662fa3.cohuck@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:41:24 +0100 Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:19:47 +0100 > Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:34:28 -0400 > > Matthew Rosato wrote: > > > > > Combined set of patches that exploit vfio/s390-pci features available in > > > kernel 5.10-rc1. This patch set is a combination of > > > > > > [PATCH v4 0/5] s390x/pci: Accomodate vfio DMA limiting > > > > > > and > > > > > > [PATCH v3 00/10] Retrieve zPCI hardware information from VFIO > > > > > > with duplicate patches removed and a single header sync. All patches have > > > prior maintainer reviews except for: > > > > > > - Patch 1 (update-linux-headers change to add new file) > > > > That one has ;) > > > > > - Patch 2 (header sync against 5.10-rc1) > > > > I'm still unsure about the rdma/(q)atomic stuff -- had we reached any > > conclusion there? > > > > > - Patch 13 - contains a functional (debug) change; I switched from using > > > DPRINTFs to using trace events per Connie's request. > > Looks good. > > I think that should go through the vfio tree, in case there are > collisions with the migration stuff? > > (The s390x queue is currently empty.) Patches appear to apply cleanly on top of the migration series, but I can take it if preferred. Thanks, Alex