From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] KVM: VMX: update vcpu posted-interrupt descriptor when assigning device
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:18:10 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511171810.GA162107@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YJqurM+LiyAY+MPO@t490s>
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:19:56PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:51:57AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:39:11AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 07:08:31PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > > Wondering whether we should add a pi_test_on() check in kvm_vcpu_has_events()
> > > > > somehow, so that even without customized ->vcpu_check_block we should be able
> > > > > to break the block loop (as kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable will return true properly)?
> > > >
> > > > static int kvm_vcpu_check_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > {
> > > > int ret = -EINTR;
> > > > int idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> > > >
> > > > if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) {
> > > > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu); <---
> > > > goto out;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Don't want to unhalt the vcpu.
> > >
> > > Could you elaborate? It's not obvious to me why we can't do that if
> > > pi_test_on() returns true.. we have pending post interrupts anyways, so
> > > shouldn't we stop halting? Thanks!
> >
> > pi_test_on() only returns true when an interrupt is signalled by the
> > device. But the sequence of events is:
> >
> >
> > 1. pCPU idles without notification vector configured to wakeup vector.
> >
> > 2. PCI device is hotplugged, assigned device count increases from 0 to 1.
> >
> > <arbitrary amount of time>
> >
> > 3. device generates interrupt, sets ON bit to true in the posted
> > interrupt descriptor.
> >
> > We want to exit kvm_vcpu_block after 2, but before 3 (where ON bit
> > is not set).
>
> Ah yes.. thanks.
>
> Besides the current approach, I'm thinking maybe it'll be cleaner/less LOC to
> define a KVM_REQ_UNBLOCK to replace the pre_block hook (in x86's kvm_host.h):
>
> #define KVM_REQ_UNBLOCK KVM_ARCH_REQ(31)
>
> We can set it in vmx_pi_start_assignment(), then check+clear it in
> kvm_vcpu_has_events() (or make it a bool in kvm_vcpu struct?).
Can't check it in kvm_vcpu_has_events() because that will set
KVM_REQ_UNHALT (which we don't want).
I think KVM_REQ_UNBLOCK will add more lines of code.
> The thing is current vmx_vcpu_check_block() is mostly a sanity check and
> copy-paste of the pi checks on a few items, so maybe cleaner to use
> KVM_REQ_UNBLOCK, as it might be reused in the future for re-evaluating of
> pre-block for similar purpose?
>
> No strong opinion, though.
Hum... IMHO v3 is quite clean already (although i don't object to your
suggestion).
Paolo, what do you think?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-11 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-07 13:06 [patch 0/4] VMX: configure posted interrupt descriptor when assigning device Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-07 13:06 ` [patch 1/4] KVM: x86: add start_assignment hook to kvm_x86_ops Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-07 19:16 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-10 17:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-07 13:06 ` [patch 2/4] KVM: add arch specific vcpu_check_block callback Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-07 13:06 ` [patch 3/4] KVM: x86: implement kvm_arch_vcpu_check_block callback Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-07 13:06 ` [patch 4/4] KVM: VMX: update vcpu posted-interrupt descriptor when assigning device Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-07 17:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-07 19:29 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-07 22:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-11 14:39 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-11 14:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-11 16:19 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-11 17:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2021-05-11 21:35 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-11 23:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-12 0:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-12 0:38 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-12 11:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-12 14:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-12 15:34 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-10 17:26 [patch 0/4] VMX: configure posted interrupt descriptor when assigning device (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-10 17:26 ` [patch 4/4] KVM: VMX: update vcpu posted-interrupt descriptor when assigning device Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-24 15:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-24 17:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-25 11:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-11 23:57 [patch 0/4] VMX: configure posted interrupt descriptor when assigning device (v4) Marcelo Tosatti
2021-05-11 23:57 ` [patch 4/4] KVM: VMX: update vcpu posted-interrupt descriptor when assigning device Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210511171810.GA162107@fuller.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pezhang@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).