kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Common API for lockless shadow page walks
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:56:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210611235701.3941724-5-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210611235701.3941724-1-dmatlack@google.com>

Introduce a common API for walking the shadow page tables locklessly
that abstracts away whether the TDP MMU is enabled or not. This will be
used in a follow-up patch to support the TDP MMU in fast_page_fault.

The API can be used as follows:

  struct shadow_page_walk walk;

  walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(vcpu);
  if (!walk_shadow_page_lockless(vcpu, addr, &walk))
    goto out;

  ... use `walk` ...

out:
  walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(vcpu);

Note: Separating walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin() from
walk_shadow_page_lockless() seems superfluous at first glance but is
needed to support fast_page_fault() since it performs multiple walks
under the same begin/end block.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 15 ++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c      | 34 ++++++------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h      |  6 ++-
 4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 1d0fe1445e04..8140c262f4d3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -623,6 +623,11 @@ static bool mmu_spte_age(u64 *sptep)
 
 static void walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	if (is_vcpu_using_tdp_mmu(vcpu)) {
+		kvm_tdp_mmu_walk_lockless_begin();
+		return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Prevent page table teardown by making any free-er wait during
 	 * kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() IPI to all active vcpus.
@@ -638,6 +643,11 @@ static void walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 static void walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	if (is_vcpu_using_tdp_mmu(vcpu)) {
+		kvm_tdp_mmu_walk_lockless_end();
+		return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Make sure the write to vcpu->mode is not reordered in front of
 	 * reads to sptes.  If it does, kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page() can see us
@@ -3501,59 +3511,61 @@ static bool mmio_info_in_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, bool direct)
 }
 
 /*
- * Return the level of the lowest level SPTE added to sptes.
- * That SPTE may be non-present.
+ * Walks the shadow page table for the given address until a leaf or non-present
+ * spte is encountered.
+ *
+ * Returns false if no walk could be performed, in which case `walk` does not
+ * contain any valid data.
+ *
+ * Must be called between walk_shadow_page_lockless_{begin,end}.
  */
-static int get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes, int *root_level)
+static bool walk_shadow_page_lockless(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr,
+				      struct shadow_page_walk *walk)
 {
-	struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
-	int leaf = -1;
+	struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator it;
+	bool walk_ok = false;
 	u64 spte;
 
-	walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(vcpu);
+	if (is_vcpu_using_tdp_mmu(vcpu))
+		return kvm_tdp_mmu_walk_lockless(vcpu, addr, walk);
 
-	for (shadow_walk_init(&iterator, vcpu, addr),
-	     *root_level = iterator.level;
-	     shadow_walk_okay(&iterator);
-	     __shadow_walk_next(&iterator, spte)) {
-		leaf = iterator.level;
-		spte = mmu_spte_get_lockless(iterator.sptep);
+	shadow_walk_init(&it, vcpu, addr);
+	walk->root_level = it.level;
 
-		sptes[leaf] = spte;
+	for (; shadow_walk_okay(&it); __shadow_walk_next(&it, spte)) {
+		walk_ok = true;
+
+		spte = mmu_spte_get_lockless(it.sptep);
+		walk->last_level = it.level;
+		walk->sptes[it.level] = spte;
 
 		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte))
 			break;
 	}
 
-	walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(vcpu);
-
-	return leaf;
+	return walk_ok;
 }
 
 /* return true if reserved bit(s) are detected on a valid, non-MMIO SPTE. */
 static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
 {
-	u64 sptes[PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL + 1];
+	struct shadow_page_walk walk;
 	struct rsvd_bits_validate *rsvd_check;
-	int root, leaf, level;
+	int last_level, level;
 	bool reserved = false;
 
-	if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa)) {
-		*sptep = 0ull;
+	*sptep = 0ull;
+
+	if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
 		return reserved;
-	}
 
-	if (is_vcpu_using_tdp_mmu(vcpu))
-		leaf = kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(vcpu, addr, sptes, &root);
-	else
-		leaf = get_walk(vcpu, addr, sptes, &root);
+	walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(vcpu);
 
-	if (unlikely(leaf < 0)) {
-		*sptep = 0ull;
-		return reserved;
-	}
+	if (!walk_shadow_page_lockless(vcpu, addr, &walk))
+		goto out;
 
-	*sptep = sptes[leaf];
+	last_level = walk.last_level;
+	*sptep = walk.sptes[last_level];
 
 	/*
 	 * Skip reserved bits checks on the terminal leaf if it's not a valid
@@ -3561,29 +3573,37 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
 	 * design, always have reserved bits set.  The purpose of the checks is
 	 * to detect reserved bits on non-MMIO SPTEs. i.e. buggy SPTEs.
 	 */
-	if (!is_shadow_present_pte(sptes[leaf]))
-		leaf++;
+	if (!is_shadow_present_pte(walk.sptes[last_level]))
+		last_level++;
 
 	rsvd_check = &vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check;
 
-	for (level = root; level >= leaf; level--)
+	for (level = walk.root_level; level >= last_level; level--) {
+		u64 spte = walk.sptes[level];
+
 		/*
 		 * Use a bitwise-OR instead of a logical-OR to aggregate the
 		 * reserved bit and EPT's invalid memtype/XWR checks to avoid
 		 * adding a Jcc in the loop.
 		 */
-		reserved |= __is_bad_mt_xwr(rsvd_check, sptes[level]) |
-			    __is_rsvd_bits_set(rsvd_check, sptes[level], level);
+		reserved |= __is_bad_mt_xwr(rsvd_check, spte) |
+			    __is_rsvd_bits_set(rsvd_check, spte, level);
+	}
 
 	if (reserved) {
 		pr_err("%s: reserved bits set on MMU-present spte, addr 0x%llx, hierarchy:\n",
 		       __func__, addr);
-		for (level = root; level >= leaf; level--)
+		for (level = walk.root_level; level >= last_level; level--) {
+			u64 spte = walk.sptes[level];
+
 			pr_err("------ spte = 0x%llx level = %d, rsvd bits = 0x%llx",
-			       sptes[level], level,
-			       rsvd_check->rsvd_bits_mask[(sptes[level] >> 7) & 1][level-1]);
+			       spte, level,
+			       rsvd_check->rsvd_bits_mask[(spte >> 7) & 1][level-1]);
+		}
 	}
 
+out:
+	walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(vcpu);
 	return reserved;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index d64ccb417c60..26da6ca30fbf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -165,4 +165,19 @@ void *mmu_memory_cache_alloc(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
 void account_huge_nx_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
 void unaccount_huge_nx_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
 
+struct shadow_page_walk {
+	/* The level of the root spte in the walk. */
+	int root_level;
+
+	/*
+	 * The level of the last spte in the walk. The last spte is either the
+	 * leaf of the walk (which may or may not be present) or the first
+	 * non-present spte encountered during the walk.
+	 */
+	int last_level;
+
+	/* The spte value at each level. */
+	u64 sptes[PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL + 1];
+};
+
 #endif /* __KVM_X86_MMU_INTERNAL_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index f4cc79dabeae..36f4844a5f95 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1504,28 +1504,32 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return spte_set;
 }
 
-/*
- * Return the level of the lowest level SPTE added to sptes.
- * That SPTE may be non-present.
- */
-int kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes,
-			 int *root_level)
+void kvm_tdp_mmu_walk_lockless_begin(void)
+{
+	rcu_read_lock();
+}
+
+void kvm_tdp_mmu_walk_lockless_end(void)
+{
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+bool kvm_tdp_mmu_walk_lockless(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr,
+			       struct shadow_page_walk *walk)
 {
 	struct tdp_iter iter;
 	struct kvm_mmu *mmu = vcpu->arch.mmu;
 	gfn_t gfn = addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-	int leaf = -1;
+	bool walk_ok = false;
 
-	*root_level = vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_root_level;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
+	walk->root_level = vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_root_level;
 
 	tdp_mmu_for_each_pte(iter, mmu, gfn, gfn + 1) {
-		leaf = iter.level;
-		sptes[leaf] = iter.old_spte;
-	}
+		walk_ok = true;
 
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+		walk->last_level = iter.level;
+		walk->sptes[iter.level] = iter.old_spte;
+	}
 
-	return leaf;
+	return walk_ok;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
index c8cf12809fcf..772d11bbb92a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
@@ -76,8 +76,10 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
 bool kvm_tdp_mmu_write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
 				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
 
-int kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes,
-			 int *root_level);
+void kvm_tdp_mmu_walk_lockless_begin(void);
+void kvm_tdp_mmu_walk_lockless_end(void);
+bool kvm_tdp_mmu_walk_lockless(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr,
+			       struct shadow_page_walk *walk);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 void kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm);
-- 
2.32.0.272.g935e593368-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-11 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-11 23:56 [PATCH 0/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Fast page fault support for the TDP MMU David Matlack
2021-06-11 23:56 ` [PATCH 1/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor is_tdp_mmu_root() David Matlack
2021-06-14 17:56   ` Ben Gardon
2021-06-14 19:07   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-14 21:23     ` David Matlack
2021-06-14 21:39       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-14 22:01         ` David Matlack
2021-06-11 23:56 ` [PATCH 2/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename cr2_or_gpa to gpa in fast_page_fault David Matlack
2021-06-14 17:56   ` Ben Gardon
2021-06-11 23:56 ` [PATCH 3/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix use of enums in trace_fast_page_fault David Matlack
2021-06-11 23:56 ` David Matlack [this message]
2021-06-14 17:56   ` [PATCH 4/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Common API for lockless shadow page walks Ben Gardon
2021-06-11 23:56 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Also record spteps in shadow_page_walk David Matlack
2021-06-14 17:56   ` Ben Gardon
2021-06-14 22:27   ` David Matlack
2021-06-14 22:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-14 23:39     ` David Matlack
2021-06-15  0:22       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-11 23:56 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: x86/mmu: fast_page_fault support for the TDP MMU David Matlack
2021-06-11 23:59   ` David Matlack
2021-06-14 17:56     ` Ben Gardon
2021-06-14 22:34       ` David Matlack
2021-06-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 7/8] KVM: selftests: Fix missing break in dirty_log_perf_test arg parsing David Matlack
2021-06-14 17:56   ` Ben Gardon
2021-06-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: selftests: Introduce access_tracking_perf_test David Matlack
2021-06-14 17:56   ` Ben Gardon
2021-06-14 21:47     ` David Matlack
2021-06-14  9:54 ` [PATCH 0/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Fast page fault support for the TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-14 21:08   ` David Matlack
2021-06-15  7:16     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-16 19:27       ` David Matlack
2021-06-16 19:31         ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210611235701.3941724-5-dmatlack@google.com \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).