kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out the meat of reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:45:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211115234603.2908381-10-bgardon@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211115234603.2908381-1-bgardon@google.com>

Factor out the implementation of reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask to a
helper function which does not require a vCPU pointer. The only element
of the struct kvm_mmu context used by the function is the shadow root
level, so pass that in too instead of the mmu context.

No functional change intended.


Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 1e890509b93f..fdf0f15ab19d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -4450,17 +4450,14 @@ static inline bool boot_cpu_is_amd(void)
  * possible, however, kvm currently does not do execution-protection.
  */
 static void
-reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-				struct kvm_mmu *context)
+build_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check,
+				int shadow_root_level)
 {
-	struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check;
 	int i;
 
-	shadow_zero_check = &context->shadow_zero_check;
-
 	if (boot_cpu_is_amd())
 		__reset_rsvds_bits_mask(shadow_zero_check, reserved_hpa_bits(),
-					context->shadow_root_level, false,
+					shadow_root_level, false,
 					boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES),
 					false, true);
 	else
@@ -4470,12 +4467,20 @@ reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (!shadow_me_mask)
 		return;
 
-	for (i = context->shadow_root_level; --i >= 0;) {
+	for (i = shadow_root_level; --i >= 0;) {
 		shadow_zero_check->rsvd_bits_mask[0][i] &= ~shadow_me_mask;
 		shadow_zero_check->rsvd_bits_mask[1][i] &= ~shadow_me_mask;
 	}
 }
 
+static void
+reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				struct kvm_mmu *context)
+{
+	build_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask(&context->shadow_zero_check,
+					context->shadow_root_level);
+}
+
 /*
  * as the comments in reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask() except it
  * is the shadow page table for intel nested guest.
-- 
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-16  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-15 23:45 [PATCH 00/15] Currently disabling dirty logging with the TDP MMU is extremely slow. On a 96 vCPU / 96G VM it takes ~45 seconds to disable dirty logging with the TDP MMU, as opposed to ~3.5 seconds with the legacy MMU. This series optimizes TLB flushes and introduces in-place large page promotion, to bring the disable dirty log time down to ~2 seconds Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 23:45 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove redundant flushes when disabling dirty logging Ben Gardon
2021-11-18  8:26   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-15 23:45 ` [PATCH 02/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce vcpu_make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 23:45 ` [PATCH 03/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor wrprot for nested PML out of make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 23:45 ` [PATCH 04/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor mt_mask " Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 23:45 ` [PATCH 05/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove need for a vcpu from kvm_slot_page_track_is_active Ben Gardon
2021-11-18  8:25   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-15 23:45 ` [PATCH 06/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove need for a vcpu from mmu_try_to_unsync_pages Ben Gardon
2021-11-18  8:25   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-15 23:45 ` [PATCH 07/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor shadow_zero_check out of make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 23:45 ` [PATCH 08/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu argument with kvm pointer in make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 23:45 ` Ben Gardon [this message]
2021-11-15 23:45 ` [PATCH 10/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Propagate memslot const qualifier Ben Gardon
2021-11-18  8:27   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-15 23:45 ` [PATCH 11/15] KVM: x86/MMU: Refactor vmx_get_mt_mask Ben Gardon
2021-11-18  8:30   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-18 15:30     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-19  9:02       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-22 18:11         ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-22 18:46           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-15 23:46 ` [PATCH 12/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out part of vmx_get_mt_mask which does not depend on vcpu Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 23:46 ` [PATCH 13/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Add try_get_mt_mask to x86_ops Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 23:46 ` [PATCH 14/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Make kvm_is_mmio_pfn usable outside of spte.c Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 23:46 ` [PATCH 15/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Promote pages in-place when disabling dirty logging Ben Gardon
2021-11-25  4:18   ` Peter Xu
2021-11-29 18:31     ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-30  0:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-30  7:28       ` Peter Xu
2021-11-30 16:01         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-01  1:59           ` Peter Xu
2021-11-15 23:58 ` [PATCH 00/15] Currently disabling dirty logging with the TDP MMU is extremely slow. On a 96 vCPU / 96G VM it takes ~45 seconds to disable dirty logging with the TDP MMU, as opposed to ~3.5 seconds with the legacy MMU. This series optimizes TLB flushes and introduces in-place large page promotion, to bring the disable dirty log time down to ~2 seconds Ben Gardon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211115234603.2908381-10-bgardon@google.com \
    --to=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    --cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).