kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, bgardon@google.com,
	dmatlack@google.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Subject: [Patch v3 5/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove "record_acc_track" in __tdp_mmu_set_spte()
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:46:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230211014626.3659152-6-vipinsh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230211014626.3659152-1-vipinsh@google.com>

Remove bool parameter "record_acc_track" from __tdp_mmu_set_spte() and
refactor the code. This variable is always set to true by its caller.

Remove single and double underscore prefix from tdp_mmu_set_spte()
related APIs:
1. Change __tdp_mmu_set_spte() to tdp_mmu_set_spte()
2. Change _tdp_mmu_set_spte() to tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte()

Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 51 +++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 5d6e77554797..e50e869bf879 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 
 /*
- * __tdp_mmu_set_spte - Set a TDP MMU SPTE and handle the associated bookkeeping
+ * tdp_mmu_set_spte - Set a TDP MMU SPTE and handle the associated bookkeeping
  * @kvm:	      KVM instance
  * @as_id:	      Address space ID, i.e. regular vs. SMM
  * @sptep:	      Pointer to the SPTE
@@ -705,18 +705,12 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
  * @new_spte:	      The new value that will be set for the SPTE
  * @gfn:	      The base GFN that was (or will be) mapped by the SPTE
  * @level:	      The level _containing_ the SPTE (its parent PT's level)
- * @record_acc_track: Notify the MM subsystem of changes to the accessed state
- *		      of the page. Should be set unless handling an MMU
- *		      notifier for access tracking. Leaving record_acc_track
- *		      unset in that case prevents page accesses from being
- *		      double counted.
  *
  * Returns the old SPTE value, which _may_ be different than @old_spte if the
  * SPTE had voldatile bits.
  */
-static u64 __tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
-			      u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-			      bool record_acc_track)
+static u64 tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
+			    u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, gfn_t gfn, int level)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
@@ -732,30 +726,19 @@ static u64 __tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
 	old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(sptep, old_spte, new_spte, level);
 
 	__handle_changed_spte(kvm, as_id, gfn, old_spte, new_spte, level, false);
-
-	if (record_acc_track)
-		handle_changed_spte_acc_track(old_spte, new_spte, level);
-
+	handle_changed_spte_acc_track(old_spte, new_spte, level);
 	handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(kvm, as_id, gfn, old_spte, new_spte,
 				      level);
 	return old_spte;
 }
 
-static inline void _tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
-				     u64 new_spte, bool record_acc_track)
+static inline void tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
+					 u64 new_spte)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->yielded);
-
-	iter->old_spte = __tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->sptep,
-					    iter->old_spte, new_spte,
-					    iter->gfn, iter->level,
-					    record_acc_track);
-}
-
-static inline void tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
-				    u64 new_spte)
-{
-	_tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, true);
+	iter->old_spte = tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->sptep,
+					  iter->old_spte, new_spte,
+					  iter->gfn, iter->level);
 }
 
 #define tdp_root_for_each_pte(_iter, _root, _start, _end) \
@@ -847,7 +830,7 @@ static void __tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 			continue;
 
 		if (!shared)
-			tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
+			tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
 		else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, 0))
 			goto retry;
 	}
@@ -904,8 +887,8 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte)))
 		return false;
 
-	__tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), sp->ptep, old_spte, 0,
-			   sp->gfn, sp->role.level + 1, true);
+	tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), sp->ptep, old_spte, 0,
+			 sp->gfn, sp->role.level + 1);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -939,7 +922,7 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 		    !is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
 			continue;
 
-		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
+		tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
 		flush = true;
 	}
 
@@ -1110,7 +1093,7 @@ static int tdp_mmu_link_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	} else {
-		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, spte);
+		tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, iter, spte);
 	}
 
 	tdp_account_mmu_page(kvm, sp);
@@ -1317,13 +1300,13 @@ static bool set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 	 * invariant that the PFN of a present * leaf SPTE can never change.
 	 * See __handle_changed_spte().
 	 */
-	tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, 0);
+	tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, iter, 0);
 
 	if (!pte_write(range->pte)) {
 		new_spte = kvm_mmu_changed_pte_notifier_make_spte(iter->old_spte,
 								  pte_pfn(range->pte));
 
-		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte);
+		tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte);
 	}
 
 	return true;
@@ -1814,7 +1797,7 @@ static bool write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 		if (new_spte == iter.old_spte)
 			break;
 
-		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
+		tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
 		spte_set = true;
 	}
 
-- 
2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-11  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-11  1:46 [Patch v3 0/7] Optimize clear dirty log Vipin Sharma
2023-02-11  1:46 ` [Patch v3 1/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a helper function to check if an SPTE needs atomic write Vipin Sharma
2023-02-11  1:46 ` [Patch v3 2/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Atomically clear SPTE dirty state in the clear-dirty-log flow Vipin Sharma
2023-02-15 21:12   ` David Matlack
2023-03-17 22:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 23:50     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-02-11  1:46 ` [Patch v3 3/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove "record_dirty_log" in __tdp_mmu_set_spte() Vipin Sharma
2023-02-15 21:10   ` David Matlack
2023-02-11  1:46 ` [Patch v3 4/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize SPTE change for aging gfn range Vipin Sharma
2023-02-15 21:15   ` David Matlack
2023-03-21  0:51   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-11  1:46 ` Vipin Sharma [this message]
2023-02-22 19:31   ` [Patch v3 5/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove "record_acc_track" in __tdp_mmu_set_spte() David Matlack
2023-02-11  1:46 ` [Patch v3 6/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove handle_changed_spte_dirty_log() Vipin Sharma
2023-02-22 19:36   ` David Matlack
2023-02-11  1:46 ` [Patch v3 7/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Merge all handle_changed_pte* functions Vipin Sharma
2023-02-22 19:42   ` David Matlack
2023-03-17 22:51   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 23:48     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-17 22:57 ` [Patch v3 0/7] Optimize clear dirty log Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 23:51   ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-21  0:41   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-21 18:11     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-21 19:57       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-21 20:40         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-21 21:38         ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230211014626.3659152-6-vipinsh@google.com \
    --to=vipinsh@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).