kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 25/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop @slot param from exported/external page-track APIs
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:22:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230311002258.852397-26-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230311002258.852397-1-seanjc@google.com>

Refactor KVM's exported/external page-track, a.k.a. write-track, APIs
to take only the gfn and do the required memslot lookup in KVM proper.
Forcing users of the APIs to get the memslot unnecessarily bleeds
KVM internals into KVMGT and complicates usage of the APIs.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h |  8 +--
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c                |  4 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c         | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h         |  5 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c      | 37 +++---------
 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index 20055064793a..415537ce45b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -43,11 +43,6 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 				    struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 };
 
-void kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
-			     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
-void kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
-				gfn_t gfn);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_EXTERNAL_WRITE_TRACKING
 enum pg_level kvm_page_track_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
 					       enum pg_level max_level);
@@ -58,6 +53,9 @@ kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 void
 kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 				   struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
+
+int kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn);
+int kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn);
 #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_EXTERNAL_WRITE_TRACKING */
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 3d1aad44c2ec..cf59b44de912 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static void account_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 
 	/* the non-leaf shadow pages are keeping readonly. */
 	if (sp->role.level > PG_LEVEL_4K)
-		return kvm_write_track_add_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
+		return __kvm_write_track_add_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
 
 	kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
 
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ static void unaccount_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 	slots = kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, sp->role);
 	slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
 	if (sp->role.level > PG_LEVEL_4K)
-		return kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
+		return __kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
 
 	kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
index 327e73be62d6..69b6431b394b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -74,16 +74,8 @@ static void update_gfn_write_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
 	slot->arch.gfn_write_track[index] += count;
 }
 
-/*
- * add guest page to the tracking pool so that corresponding access on that
- * page will be intercepted.
- *
- * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
- * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
- * @gfn: the guest page.
- */
-void kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
-			     gfn_t gfn)
+void __kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+			       gfn_t gfn)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
@@ -104,18 +96,9 @@ void kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 	if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn, PG_LEVEL_4K))
 		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_track_add_gfn);
 
-/*
- * remove the guest page from the tracking pool which stops the interception
- * of corresponding access on that page.
- *
- * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
- * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
- * @gfn: the guest page.
- */
-void kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
-				struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
+void __kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
+				  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
@@ -133,7 +116,6 @@ void kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
 	 */
 	kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_track_remove_gfn);
 
 /*
  * check if the corresponding access on the specified guest page is tracked.
@@ -274,4 +256,64 @@ enum pg_level kvm_page_track_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
 	return max_level;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_track_max_mapping_level);
+
+/*
+ * add guest page to the tracking pool so that corresponding access on that
+ * page will be intercepted.
+ *
+ * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
+ * @gfn: the guest page.
+ */
+int kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
+{
+	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+	int idx;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+
+	slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
+	if (!slot) {
+		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+	__kvm_write_track_add_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
+	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_track_add_gfn);
+
+/*
+ * remove the guest page from the tracking pool which stops the interception
+ * of corresponding access on that page.
+ *
+ * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
+ * @gfn: the guest page.
+ */
+int kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
+{
+	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+	int idx;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+
+	slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
+	if (!slot) {
+		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+	__kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
+	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_track_remove_gfn);
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
index 50d3278e8c69..62f98c6c5af3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
@@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
 				  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 				  unsigned long npages);
 
+void __kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+			       gfn_t gfn);
+void __kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
+				  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
+
 bool kvm_gfn_is_write_tracked(struct kvm *kvm,
 			      const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index e5a18d92030b..898f1f1d308d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -1560,9 +1560,7 @@ static struct mdev_driver intel_vgpu_mdev_driver = {
 
 int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
 {
-	struct kvm *kvm = info->vfio_device.kvm;
-	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
-	int idx;
+	int r;
 
 	if (!test_bit(INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED, info->status))
 		return -ESRCH;
@@ -1570,18 +1568,9 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
 	if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
 		return 0;
 
-	idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
-	slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
-	if (!slot) {
-		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-	kvm_write_track_add_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
-	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
-	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+	r = kvm_write_track_add_gfn(info->vfio_device.kvm, gfn);
+	if (r)
+		return r;
 
 	kvmgt_protect_table_add(info, gfn);
 	return 0;
@@ -1589,9 +1578,7 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
 
 int intel_gvt_page_track_remove(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
 {
-	struct kvm *kvm = info->vfio_device.kvm;
-	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
-	int idx;
+	int r;
 
 	if (!test_bit(INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED, info->status))
 		return -ESRCH;
@@ -1599,17 +1586,9 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_remove(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
 	if (!kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
 		return 0;
 
-	idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
-	slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
-	if (!slot) {
-		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-	kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
-	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+	r = kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(info->vfio_device.kvm, gfn);
+	if (r)
+		return r;
 
 	kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-11  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-11  0:22 [PATCH v2 00/27] drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/27] drm/i915/gvt: Verify pfn is "valid" before dereferencing "struct page" Sean Christopherson
2023-03-13 15:37   ` Wang, Wei W
2023-03-15 18:13     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-15 19:23       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  4:20   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out helper to get max mapping size of a memslot Sean Christopherson
2023-03-13 15:37   ` Wang, Wei W
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/27] drm/i915/gvt: remove interface intel_gvt_is_valid_gfn Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  4:26   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/27] drm/i915/gvt: Incorporate KVM memslot info into check for 2MiB GTT entry Sean Christopherson
2023-03-14  3:09   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-14 17:13     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/27] drm/i915/gvt: Verify VFIO-pinned page is THP when shadowing 2M gtt entry Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  5:33   ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-04 20:41     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-06  6:35       ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-06 10:57         ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-08 14:05           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/27] drm/i915/gvt: Put the page reference obtained by KVM's gfn_to_pfn() Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  6:18   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/27] drm/i915/gvt: Don't rely on KVM's gfn_to_pfn() to query possible 2M GTT Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  5:37   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/27] drm/i915/gvt: Use an "unsigned long" to iterate over memslot gfns Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  6:19   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/27] drm/i915/gvt: Drop unused helper intel_vgpu_reset_gtt() Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  6:20   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 10/27] drm/i915/gvt: Protect gfn hash table with vgpu_lock Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  6:21   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 11/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't rely on page-track mechanism to flush on memslot change Sean Christopherson
2023-03-15  1:08   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 15:32     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 12/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't bounce through page-track mechanism for guest PTEs Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  6:37   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 13/27] KVM: drm/i915/gvt: Drop @vcpu from KVM's ->track_write() hook Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  7:28   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 14/27] KVM: x86: Reject memslot MOVE operations if KVMGT is attached Sean Christopherson
2023-03-15  8:03   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 15:43     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-16  9:27       ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-17  7:29   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 15/27] drm/i915/gvt: Don't bother removing write-protection on to-be-deleted slot Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  7:30   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 16/27] KVM: x86: Add a new page-track hook to handle memslot deletion Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  7:43   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-17 16:20     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 17/27] drm/i915/gvt: switch from ->track_flush_slot() to ->track_remove_region() Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  7:45   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 18/27] KVM: x86: Remove the unused page-track hook track_flush_slot() Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 19/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Move KVM-only page-track declarations to internal header Sean Christopherson
2023-03-15  8:44   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 15:13     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-16  9:19       ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 20/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Use page-track notifiers iff there are external users Sean Christopherson
2023-03-15  9:34   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 16:21     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-16  9:29       ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 10:36   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 16:54     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-04 19:54       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-06  1:08         ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 21/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop infrastructure for multiple page-track modes Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 22/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename page-track APIs to reflect the new reality Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 23/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Assert that correct locks are held for page write-tracking Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  7:55   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 24/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug the VM if write-tracking is used but not enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11  0:22 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-03-17  8:28   ` [PATCH v2 25/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop @slot param from exported/external page-track APIs Yan Zhao
2023-03-23  8:50     ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-03 23:16       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-04  2:17         ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-08  1:15           ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-11 22:39             ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-12  2:58               ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 26/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle KVM bookkeeping in page-track APIs, not callers Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  8:52   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11  0:22 ` [PATCH v2 27/27] drm/i915/gvt: Drop final dependencies on KVM internal details Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17  8:58   ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-13  9:58 ` [PATCH v2 00/27] drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups Yan Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230311002258.852397-26-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).