From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 31/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Report CPU state to Ultravisor
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 20:36:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e74ad84-b0ae-9dc1-91cc-52be989d6c34@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33cffbe7-9d87-d94f-dc56-6d31ea2e56eb@redhat.com>
On 18.02.20 10:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 14.02.20 23:26, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> VCPU states have to be reported to the ultravisor for SIGP
>> interpretation, kdump, kexec and reboot.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
>> [borntraeger@de.ibm.com: patch merging, splitting, fixing]
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 7 ++++++-
>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 2 ++
>> arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h
>> index 254d5769d136..7b82881ec3b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>> #define UVC_CMD_UNPACK_IMG 0x0301
>> #define UVC_CMD_VERIFY_IMG 0x0302
>> #define UVC_CMD_PREPARE_RESET 0x0320
>> +#define UVC_CMD_CPU_SET_STATE 0x0330
>> #define UVC_CMD_SET_UNSHARE_ALL 0x0340
>> #define UVC_CMD_PIN_PAGE_SHARED 0x0341
>> #define UVC_CMD_UNPIN_PAGE_SHARED 0x0342
>> @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ enum uv_cmds_inst {
>> BIT_UVC_CMD_SET_SEC_PARMS = 11,
>> BIT_UVC_CMD_UNPACK_IMG = 13,
>> BIT_UVC_CMD_VERIFY_IMG = 14,
>> + BIT_UVC_CMD_CPU_SET_STATE = 17,
>> BIT_UVC_CMD_PREPARE_RESET = 18,
>> BIT_UVC_CMD_UNSHARE_ALL = 20,
>> BIT_UVC_CMD_PIN_PAGE_SHARED = 21,
>> @@ -164,6 +166,19 @@ struct uv_cb_unp {
>> u64 reserved38[3];
>> } __packed __aligned(8);
>>
>> +#define PV_CPU_STATE_OPR 1
>> +#define PV_CPU_STATE_STP 2
>> +#define PV_CPU_STATE_CHKSTP 3
>> +
>> +struct uv_cb_cpu_set_state {
>> + struct uv_cb_header header;
>> + u64 reserved08[2];
>> + u64 cpu_handle;
>> + u8 reserved20[7];
>> + u8 state;
>> + u64 reserved28[5];
>> +};
>> +
>> /*
>> * A common UV call struct for calls that take no payload
>> * Examples:
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> index ad84c1144908..5426b01e3da1 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> @@ -4396,6 +4396,7 @@ static void __enable_ibs_on_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> int i, online_vcpus, started_vcpus = 0;
>> + u16 rc, rrc;
>>
>> if (!is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu))
>> return;
>> @@ -4421,7 +4422,8 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> */
>> __disable_ibs_on_all_vcpus(vcpu->kvm);
>> }
>> -
>> + /* Let's tell the UV that we want to start again */
>> + kvm_s390_pv_set_cpu_state(vcpu, PV_CPU_STATE_OPR, &rc, &rrc);
>> kvm_s390_clear_cpuflags(vcpu, CPUSTAT_STOPPED);
>> /*
>> * Another VCPU might have used IBS while we were offline.
>> @@ -4436,6 +4438,7 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> int i, online_vcpus, started_vcpus = 0;
>> struct kvm_vcpu *started_vcpu = NULL;
>> + u16 rc, rrc;
>>
>> if (is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu))
>> return;
>> @@ -4449,6 +4452,8 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> kvm_s390_clear_stop_irq(vcpu);
>>
>> kvm_s390_set_cpuflags(vcpu, CPUSTAT_STOPPED);
>> + /* Let's tell the UV that we successfully stopped the vcpu */
>> + kvm_s390_pv_set_cpu_state(vcpu, PV_CPU_STATE_STP, &rc, &rrc);
>> __disable_ibs_on_vcpu(vcpu);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < online_vcpus; i++) {
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
>> index d5503dd0d1e4..1af1e30beead 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
>> @@ -218,6 +218,8 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_set_sec_parms(struct kvm *kvm, void *hdr, u64 length, u16 *rc,
>> u16 *rrc);
>> int kvm_s390_pv_unpack(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long addr, unsigned long size,
>> unsigned long tweak, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc);
>> +int kvm_s390_pv_set_cpu_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 state, u16 *rc,
>> + u16 *rrc);
>>
>> static inline bool kvm_s390_pv_is_protected(struct kvm *kvm)
>> {
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
>> index 80169a9b43ec..b4bf6b6eb708 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
>> @@ -271,3 +271,25 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_unpack(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long addr, unsigned long size,
>> KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "%s", "PROTVIRT VM UNPACK: successful");
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +
>> +int kvm_s390_pv_set_cpu_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 state, u16 *rc,
>> + u16 *rrc)
>> +{
>> + struct uv_cb_cpu_set_state uvcb = {
>> + .header.cmd = UVC_CMD_CPU_SET_STATE,
>> + .header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
>> + .cpu_handle = kvm_s390_pv_handle_cpu(vcpu),
>> + .state = state,
>> + };
>> + int cc;
>> +
>> + if (!kvm_s390_pv_handle_cpu(vcpu))
>
> I'd actually prefer to move this to the caller. (and sue the _protected
> variant)
ack this makes sense.
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
>> + *rc = uvcb.header.rc;
>> + *rrc = uvcb.header.rrc;
>> + if (cc)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> All return values are ignored. warn instead and make this a void function?
Hmm, I think userspace can trigger errors (e.g. invalid state or invalid point in time)
So Warning is not good. We should actually return an error to userspace I guess.
by requiring user sigp for protvirt we can minimize the changes.
Something like this on top of the current tree
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 7bc63e0ed740..5c99a0441f70 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -2441,6 +2441,8 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
case KVM_S390_PV_COMMAND: {
struct kvm_pv_cmd args;
+ /* protvirt means user sigp */
+ kvm->arch.user_cpu_state_ctrl = 1;
r = 0;
if (!is_prot_virt_host()) {
r = -EINVAL;
@@ -3702,17 +3704,17 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
switch (mp_state->mp_state) {
case KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED:
- kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(vcpu);
+ rc = kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(vcpu);
break;
case KVM_MP_STATE_OPERATING:
- kvm_s390_vcpu_start(vcpu);
+ rc = kvm_s390_vcpu_start(vcpu);
break;
case KVM_MP_STATE_LOAD:
if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu)) {
rc = -ENXIO;
break;
}
- kvm_s390_pv_set_cpu_state(vcpu, PV_CPU_STATE_OPR_LOAD);
+ rc = kvm_s390_pv_set_cpu_state(vcpu, PV_CPU_STATE_OPR_LOAD);
break;
case KVM_MP_STATE_CHECK_STOP:
/* fall through - CHECK_STOP and LOAD are not supported yet */
@@ -4444,12 +4446,12 @@ static void __enable_ibs_on_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_s390_sync_request(KVM_REQ_ENABLE_IBS, vcpu);
}
-void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+int kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int i, online_vcpus, started_vcpus = 0;
+ int i, online_vcpus, r= 0, started_vcpus = 0;
if (!is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu))
- return;
+ return 0;
trace_kvm_s390_vcpu_start_stop(vcpu->vcpu_id, 1);
/* Only one cpu at a time may enter/leave the STOPPED state. */
@@ -4473,7 +4475,8 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
__disable_ibs_on_all_vcpus(vcpu->kvm);
}
/* Let's tell the UV that we want to start again */
- kvm_s390_pv_set_cpu_state(vcpu, PV_CPU_STATE_OPR);
+ if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
+ r = kvm_s390_pv_set_cpu_state(vcpu, PV_CPU_STATE_OPR);
kvm_s390_clear_cpuflags(vcpu, CPUSTAT_STOPPED);
/*
* The real PSW might have changed due to a RESTART interpreted by the
@@ -4488,16 +4491,16 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu);
spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
- return;
+ return r;
}
-void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+int kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int i, online_vcpus, started_vcpus = 0;
+ int i, online_vcpus, r = 0, started_vcpus = 0;
struct kvm_vcpu *started_vcpu = NULL;
if (is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu))
- return;
+ return 0;
trace_kvm_s390_vcpu_start_stop(vcpu->vcpu_id, 0);
/* Only one cpu at a time may enter/leave the STOPPED state. */
@@ -4509,7 +4512,8 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_s390_set_cpuflags(vcpu, CPUSTAT_STOPPED);
/* Let's tell the UV that we successfully stopped the vcpu */
- kvm_s390_pv_set_cpu_state(vcpu, PV_CPU_STATE_STP);
+ if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
+ r = kvm_s390_pv_set_cpu_state(vcpu, PV_CPU_STATE_STP);
__disable_ibs_on_vcpu(vcpu);
for (i = 0; i < online_vcpus; i++) {
@@ -4528,7 +4532,7 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
- return;
+ return r;
}
static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index cd05c1bbda0e..e9e1996d643b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -333,8 +333,8 @@ void kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(struct kvm *kvm,
long kvm_arch_fault_in_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, int writable);
int kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr);
int kvm_s390_vcpu_store_status(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr);
-void kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-void kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+int kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+int kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_s390_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_s390_vcpu_unblock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
bool kvm_s390_vcpu_sie_inhibited(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-19 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-14 22:26 [PATCH v2 00/42] KVM: s390: Add support for protected VMs Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/42] mm:gup/writeback: add callbacks for inaccessible pages Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 9:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-17 11:10 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 8:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 15:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-18 16:02 ` Will Deacon
2020-02-18 16:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 21:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-19 8:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/42] KVM: s390/interrupt: do not pin adapter interrupt pages Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 9:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-20 12:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-20 13:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-20 13:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/42] s390/protvirt: introduce host side setup Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 9:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-17 11:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 11:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/42] s390/protvirt: add ultravisor initialization Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 9:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-17 11:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/42] s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 10:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-17 11:28 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 12:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/42] s390/mm: add (non)secure page access exceptions handlers Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add UV debug trace Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 10:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/42] KVM: s390: add new variants of UV CALL Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 10:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add initial vm and cpu lifecycle handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 10:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-17 12:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 12:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-17 14:53 ` [PATCH 0/2] example changes Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 14:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] lock changes Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 14:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] merge vm/cpu create Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 15:00 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-17 15:02 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-19 11:02 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 19:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] example changes David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 8:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add initial vm and cpu lifecycle handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 8:39 ` [PATCH v2.1] " Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 21:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-19 8:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-19 11:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 20:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add KVM api documentation Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 11/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Secure memory is not mergeable Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 12/42] KVM: s390/mm: Make pages accessible before destroying the guest Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 13/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Handle SE notification interceptions Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 14/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Instruction emulation Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 15/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add interruption injection controls Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 10:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 16/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Implement interruption injection Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 17/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add SCLP interrupt handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 18/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Handle spec exception loops Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 19/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add new gprs location handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 11:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-17 11:33 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 14:37 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 20/42] KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 11:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-17 14:47 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-17 15:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 15:38 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-17 16:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 21/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: handle secure guest prefix pages Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 11:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 22/42] KVM: s390/mm: handle guest unpin events Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 14:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 23/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Write sthyi data to instruction data area Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 14:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-17 18:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 19:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 24/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: STSI handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 8:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 8:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 9:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 25/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: disallow one_reg Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 8:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 8:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 26/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Do only reset registers that are accessible Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 8:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 9:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 27/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Only sync fmt4 registers Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 28/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add program exception injection Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 9:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 29/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add diag 308 subcode 8 - 10 handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-19 12:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 30/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: UV calls in support of diag308 0, 1 Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-19 11:53 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 31/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Report CPU state to Ultravisor Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-19 19:36 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2020-02-19 19:46 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-20 10:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 32/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Support cmd 5 operation state Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-19 11:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-19 11:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 33/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Mask PSW interrupt bits for interception 104 and 112 Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 10:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 10:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 34/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: do not inject interrupts after start Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-18 10:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 35/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add UV cpu reset calls Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 9:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 36/42] DOCUMENTATION: Protected virtual machine introduction and IPL Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 37/42] s390/uv: Fix handling of length extensions (already in s390 tree) Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 38/42] s390: protvirt: Add sysfs firmware interface for Ultravisor information Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 39/42] example for future extension: mm:gup/writeback: add callbacks for inaccessible pages: error cases Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 16:25 ` Will Deacon
2020-02-18 16:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 16:33 ` Will Deacon
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 40/42] example for future extension: mm:gup/writeback: add callbacks for inaccessible pages: source indication Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 14:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2020-02-17 14:38 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 41/42] potential fixup for "s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests" Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 42/42] KVM: s390: rstify new ioctls in api.rst Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e74ad84-b0ae-9dc1-91cc-52be989d6c34@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).