Re: [PATCH v2 17/17] drm/i915: Properly request PCI BARs

[Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>]

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:47 AM Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:59:34AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > When trying to test my CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM changes I realized they
> > do nothing for i915. Because i915 doesn't request any regions, like
> > pretty much all drm pci drivers. I guess this is some very old
> > remnants from the userspace modesetting days, when we wanted to
> > co-exist with the fbdev driver. Which usually requested these
> > resources.
> >
> > But makes me wonder why the pci subsystem doesn't just request
> > resource automatically when we map a bar and a pci driver is bound?
> >
> > Knowledge about which pci bars we need kludged together from
> > intel_uncore.c and intel_gtt.c from i915 and intel-gtt.c over in the
> > fake agp driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > index 54e201fdeba4..ce39049d8919 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > @@ -1692,10 +1692,13 @@ static int uncore_mmio_setup(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> >       struct pci_dev *pdev = i915->drm.pdev;
> >       int mmio_bar;
> >       int mmio_size;
> > +     int bar_selection;
>
> Signed bitmasks always make me uneasy. But looks like
> that's what it is in the pci api. So meh.

Yeah it's surprising.

> > +     int ret;
> >
> >       mmio_bar = IS_GEN(i915, 2) ? 1 : 0;
> > +     bar_selection = BIT (2) | BIT(mmio_bar);
>                            ^
> spurious space
>
> That's also not correct for gen2 I think.
>
> gen2:
> 0 = GMADR
> 1 = MMADR
> 2 = IOBAR
>
> gen3:
> 0 = MMADR
> 1 = IOBAR
> 2 = GMADR
> 3 = GTTADR
>
> gen4+:
> 0+1 = GTTMMADR
> 2+3 = GMADR
> 4 = IOBAR
>
> Maybe we should just have an explicit list of bars like that in a
> comment?
>
> I'd also suggest sucking this bitmask calculation into a small helper
> so you can reuse it for the release.

tbh I just hacked this up for testing. Given how almost no other drm
driver does this, I'm wondering whether we should or not.

Also the only reason why I didn't just use the pci_request_regions
helper is to avoid the vga ioport range, since that's managed by
vgaarbiter.

So I think if we go for this for real we should:
- register the vga ioport range in the vgaarbiter
- have a pci_request_iomem_regions helper that grabs all mem bars
- roll that out to all drm pci drivers

Or something like that. The other complication is when we resize the
iobar. So not really sure what to do here.
-Daniel

>
> >       /*
> > -      * Before gen4, the registers and the GTT are behind different BARs.
> > +      * On gen3 the registers and the GTT are behind different BARs.
> >        * However, from gen4 onwards, the registers and the GTT are shared
> >        * in the same BAR, so we want to restrict this ioremap from
> >        * clobbering the GTT which we want ioremap_wc instead. Fortunately,
> > @@ -1703,6 +1706,8 @@ static int uncore_mmio_setup(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> >        * generations up to Ironlake.
> >        * For dgfx chips register range is expanded to 4MB.
> >        */
> > +     if (INTEL_GEN(i915) == 3)
> > +             bar_selection |= BIT(3);
> >       if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 5)
> >               mmio_size = 512 * 1024;
> >       else if (IS_DGFX(i915))
> > @@ -1710,8 +1715,15 @@ static int uncore_mmio_setup(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> >       else
> >               mmio_size = 2 * 1024 * 1024;
> >
> > +     ret = pci_request_selected_regions(pdev, bar_selection, "i915");
> > +     if (ret < 0) {
> > +             drm_err(&i915->drm, "failed to request pci bars\n");
> > +             return ret;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       uncore->regs = pci_iomap(pdev, mmio_bar, mmio_size);
> >       if (uncore->regs == NULL) {
> > +             pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, bar_selection);
> >               drm_err(&i915->drm, "failed to map registers\n");
> >               return -EIO;
> >       }
> > @@ -1721,9 +1733,18 @@ static int uncore_mmio_setup(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> >
> >  static void uncore_mmio_cleanup(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> >  {
> > -     struct pci_dev *pdev = uncore->i915->drm.pdev;
> > +     struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uncore->i915;
> > +     struct pci_dev *pdev = i915->drm.pdev;
> > +     int mmio_bar;
> > +     int bar_selection;
> > +
> > +     mmio_bar = IS_GEN(i915, 2) ? 1 : 0;
> > +     bar_selection = BIT (2) | BIT(mmio_bar);
> > +     if (INTEL_GEN(i915) == 3)
> > +             bar_selection |= BIT(3);
> >
> >       pci_iounmap(pdev, uncore->regs);
> > +     pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, bar_selection);
> >  }
> >
> >  void intel_uncore_init_early(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch