kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: x86: avoid loading PDPTRs after migration when possible
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 20:53:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YM0H3Hvs8/3+twnc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607090203.133058-9-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 11260e83518f..eadfc9caf500 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -815,6 +815,8 @@ int load_pdptrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu, unsigned long cr3)
>  
>  	memcpy(mmu->pdptrs, pdpte, sizeof(mmu->pdptrs));
>  	kvm_register_mark_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_EXREG_PDPTR);
> +	vcpu->arch.pdptrs_restored_oob = false;
> +
>  out:
>  
>  	return ret;
> @@ -10113,6 +10115,7 @@ static int __set_sregs2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_sregs2 *sregs2)
>  
>  		kvm_register_mark_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_EXREG_PDPTR);
>  		mmu_reset_needed = 1;
> +		vcpu->arch.pdptrs_restored_oob = true;

Setting pdptrs_restored_oob[*] here and _only_ clearing it on successful
load_pdptrs() is not robust.  Potential problems once the flag is set:

  1.  Userspace calls KVM_SET_SREGS{,2} without valid PDPTRs.  Flag is now stale.
  2.  kvm_check_nested_events() VM-Exits to L1 before the flag is processed.
      Flag is now stale.

(2) might not be problematic in practice since the "normal" load_pdptrs()
should reset the flag on the next VM-Enter, but it's really, really hard to tell.
E.g. what if an SMI causes an exit and _that_ non-VM-Enter reload of L2 state
is the first to trip the flag?  The bool is essentially an extension of
KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES, I think it makes sense to clear the flag whenever
KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES is cleared.

Another thing that's not obvious is the required ordering between KVM_SET_SREGS2
and KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE.  AFAICT it's not documented, but that may be PEBKAC on
my end.  E.g. what happens if walk_mmu == &root_mmu (L1 active in targte KVM)
when SET_SREGS2 is called, and _then_ KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE is called?

[*] pdptrs_from_userspace in Paolo's tree.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-18 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-07  9:01 [PATCH v3 0/8] Introduce KVM_{GET|SET}_SREGS2 and fix PDPTR migration Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-07  9:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] KVM: nVMX: Drop obsolete (and pointless) pdptrs_changed() check Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-07  9:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: nSVM: Drop pointless pdptrs_changed() check on nested transition Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-07  9:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: x86: Always load PDPTRs on CR3 load for SVM w/o NPT and a PAE guest Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-07  9:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] KVM: nSVM: refactor the CR3 reload on migration Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-07  9:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: nVMX: delay loading of PDPTRs to KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-07  9:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM: x86: introduce kvm_register_clear_available Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-07  9:02 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_GET_SREGS2 / KVM_SET_SREGS2 Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-10 15:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-07  9:02 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: x86: avoid loading PDPTRs after migration when possible Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-18 20:53   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-06-19  7:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-20 22:25     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-10 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Introduce KVM_{GET|SET}_SREGS2 and fix PDPTR migration Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YM0H3Hvs8/3+twnc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).