From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: nSVM: Check reserved bits in DR6, DR7 and EFER on vmrun of nested guests
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 19:09:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd18bc82-0757-591a-62e9-0c701b593674@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fa88813-684c-f7ac-495b-68fe6cdbd5b2@oracle.com>
On 03/07/20 00:33, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On 5/22/20 3:19 PM, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
>> Patch# 1: Moves the check for upper 32 reserved bits of DR6 to a new
>> function.
>> Patch# 2: Adds the KVM checks for DR6[63:32] and DR7[64:32] reserved bits
>> Patch# 3: Adds kvm-unit-tests for DR6[63:32] and DR7[64:32] reserved
>> bits and
>> reserved bits in EFER
>> Patch# 4: Removes the duplicate definition of 'vmcb' that sneaked via
>> one of
>> my previous patches.
>>
>>
>> [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Move the check for upper 32 reserved bits of
>> [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nSVM: Check that DR6[63:32] and DR7[64:32] are not
>> [PATCH 3/4] kvm-unit-tests: nSVM: Test that DR6[63:32], DR7[63:32]
>> [PATCH 4/4] kvm-unit-tests: x86: Remove duplicate instance of 'vmcb'
>>
>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Krish Sadhukhan (2):
>> KVM: x86: Move the check for upper 32 reserved bits of DR6 to
>> separate fun
>> KVM: nVMX: Check that DR6[63:32] and DR7[64:32] are not set on
>> vmrun of ne
>> x86/svm.c | 1 -
>> x86/svm.h | 3 +++
>> x86/svm_tests.c | 59
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> Krish Sadhukhan (2):
>> kvm-unit-tests: nSVM: Test that DR6[63:32], DR7[63:32] and EFER
>> reserved b
>> kvm-unit-tests: x86: Remove duplicate instance of 'vmcb'
>>
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-03 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-22 22:19 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: nSVM: Check reserved bits in DR6, DR7 and EFER on vmrun of nested guests Krish Sadhukhan
2020-05-22 22:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Move the check for upper 32 reserved bits of DR6 to separate function Krish Sadhukhan
2020-05-22 22:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nSVM: Check that DR6[63:32] and DR7[64:32] are not set on vmrun of nested guests Krish Sadhukhan
2020-05-22 22:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] kvm-unit-tests: nSVM: Test that DR6[63:32], DR7[63:32] and EFER reserved bits " Krish Sadhukhan
2020-05-22 22:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] kvm-unit-tests: x86: Remove duplicate instance of 'vmcb' Krish Sadhukhan
2020-06-23 9:04 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: nSVM: Check reserved bits in DR6, DR7 and EFER on vmrun of nested guests Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-02 22:33 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2020-07-03 17:09 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd18bc82-0757-591a-62e9-0c701b593674@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).