From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA05C43613 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E7D20673 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:39:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E3E7D20673 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EB94A4EC; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 05:39:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o+bfsYFe-MgX; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 05:39:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A444A544; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 05:39:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DA54A319 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 05:39:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LK94buwODohv for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 05:39:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EE24A511 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 05:39:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09896147A; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 02:39:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from filthy-habits.cambridge.arm.com (filthy-habits.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.61]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9F6F3F246; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 02:39:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 22/59] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:38:06 +0100 Message-Id: <20190621093843.220980-23-marc.zyngier@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190621093843.220980-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> References: <20190621093843.220980-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Andre Przywara , Dave Martin X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu From: Jintack Lim VMs used to execute hvc #0 for the psci call if EL3 is not implemented. However, when we come to provide the virtual EL2 mode to the VM, the host OS inside the VM calls kvm_call_hyp() which is also hvc #0. So, it's hard to differentiate between them from the host hypervisor's point of view. So, let the VM execute smc instruction for the psci call. On ARMv8.3, even if EL3 is not implemented, a smc instruction executed at non-secure EL1 is trapped to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TSC==1, rather than being treated as UNDEFINED. So, the host hypervisor can handle this psci call without any confusion. Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c index e662f23b63a1..e348c15c81bc 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) { + int ret; + /* * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a @@ -77,10 +79,28 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) * * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would * otherwise return to the same address... + * + * If imm is non-zero, it's not defined, so just skip it. + */ + if (kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu)) { + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)); + return 1; + } + + /* + * If imm is zero, it's a psci call. + * Note that on ARMv8.3, even if EL3 is not implemented, SMC executed + * at Non-secure EL1 is trapped to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TSC==1, rather than + * being treated as UNDEFINED. */ - vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + ret = kvm_hvc_call_handler(vcpu); + if (ret < 0) + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)); - return 1; + + return ret; } /* -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm