From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" <eric.auger.pro@gmail.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
"jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com" <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: "marc.zyngier@arm.com" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"vincent.stehle@arm.com" <vincent.stehle@arm.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 23/29] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:17:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d36cf34-a89b-6587-08e9-99242e2f34dc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A2975661238FB949B60364EF0F2C257439EFB432@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Liu,
On 6/14/19 2:38 PM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2019 12:10 AM
>> Subject: [PATCH v8 23/29] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE
>>
>> From: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> When the guest "owns" the stage 1 translation structures, the host IOMMU driver
>> has no knowledge of caching structure updates unless the guest invalidation
>> requests are trapped and passed down to the host.
>>
>> This patch adds the VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE ioctl with aims at
>> propagating guest stage1 IOMMU cache invalidations to the host.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>
>> ---
>> v6 -> v7:
>> - Use iommu_capsule struct
>> - renamed vfio_iommu_for_each_dev into vfio_iommu_lookup_dev
>> due to checkpatch error related to for_each_dev suffix
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - introduce vfio_iommu_for_each_dev back in this patch
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - s/TLB/CACHE
>> - remove vfio_iommu_task usage
>> - commit message rewording
>> ---
>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 13 ++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index b2d609d6fe83..6fda4fbc9bfa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -120,6 +120,34 @@ struct vfio_regions {
>> #define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu) \
>> (!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
>>
>> +struct domain_capsule {
>> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
>> + void *data;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* iommu->lock must be held */
>> +static int
>> +vfio_iommu_lookup_dev(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>> + int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data),
>> + void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct domain_capsule dc = {.data = data};
>> + struct vfio_domain *d;
>> + struct vfio_group *g;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
>> + dc.domain = d->domain;
>> + list_for_each_entry(g, &d->group_list, next) {
>> + ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(g->iommu_group,
>> + &dc, fn);
>> + if (ret)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot);
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1795,6 +1823,15 @@ vfio_attach_pasid_table(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int vfio_cache_inv_fn(struct device *dev, void *data) {
>> + struct domain_capsule *dc = (struct domain_capsule *)data;
>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate *ustruct =
>> + (struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate *)dc->data;
>> +
>> + return iommu_cache_invalidate(dc->domain, dev, &ustruct->info); }
>> +
>> static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { @@ -
>> 1881,6 +1918,24 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>> } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_DETACH_PASID_TABLE) {
>> vfio_detach_pasid_table(iommu);
>> return 0;
>> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE) {
>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate ustruct;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate,
>> + info);
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(&ustruct, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + if (ustruct.argsz < minsz || ustruct.flags)
>
> May remove the flags field?
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>> + ret = vfio_iommu_lookup_dev(iommu, vfio_cache_inv_fn,
>> + &ustruct);
>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> return -ENOTTY;
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h index
>> 4316dd8cb5b5..055aa9b9745a 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> @@ -785,6 +785,19 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_attach_pasid_table {
>> */
>> #define VFIO_IOMMU_DETACH_PASID_TABLE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 23)
>>
>> +/**
>> + * VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 24,
>> + * struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate)
>> + *
>> + * Propagate guest IOMMU cache invalidation to the host.
>> + */
>> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate {
>> + __u32 argsz;
>> + __u32 flags;
>
> Looks like there is no more usage on "flags". is it?
Agreed. However all the other vfio structs embed it.
vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap (VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA) or
vfio_iommu_type1_info (VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO) also feature it and do not
use it either if I am not wrong.
So I guess flags is a common pattern for the API and somehow allows to
extend the API if needed. So I would be inclined to keep it, no?
Thanks
Eric
>
> Regards,
> Yi Liu
>
>> + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info info; };
>> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 24)
>> +
>> /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-14 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-26 16:09 [PATCH v8 00/29] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 01/29] driver core: Add per device iommu param Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 02/29] iommu: Introduce device fault data Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 03/29] iommu: Introduce device fault report API Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 04/29] iommu: Add recoverable fault reporting Eric Auger
2019-06-03 22:31 ` Alex Williamson
2019-06-04 15:48 ` Jacob Pan
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 05/29] iommu: Add a timeout parameter for PRQ response Eric Auger
2019-06-03 22:32 ` Alex Williamson
2019-06-04 10:52 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-04 15:50 ` Jacob Pan
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 06/29] trace/iommu: Add sva trace events Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 07/29] iommu: Use device fault trace event Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 08/29] iommu: Introduce attach/detach_pasid_table API Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 09/29] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 10/29] iommu: Introduce bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 11/29] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 12/29] iommu/smmuv3: Dynamically allocate s1_cfg and s2_cfg Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 13/29] iommu/smmuv3: Get prepared for nested stage support Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 14/29] iommu/smmuv3: Implement attach/detach_pasid_table Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 15/29] iommu/smmuv3: Introduce __arm_smmu_tlb_inv_asid/s1_range_nosync Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 16/29] iommu/smmuv3: Implement cache_invalidate Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 17/29] dma-iommu: Implement NESTED_MSI cookie Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 18/29] iommu/smmuv3: Nested mode single MSI doorbell per domain enforcement Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 19/29] iommu/smmuv3: Enforce incompatibility between nested mode and HW MSI regions Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 20/29] iommu/smmuv3: Implement bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 21/29] iommu/smmuv3: Report non recoverable faults Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 22/29] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_ATTACH/DETACH_PASID_TABLE Eric Auger
2019-06-03 22:32 ` Alex Williamson
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 23/29] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE Eric Auger
2019-06-14 12:38 ` Liu, Yi L
2019-06-14 13:17 ` Auger Eric [this message]
2019-05-26 16:09 ` [PATCH v8 24/29] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_BIND/UNBIND_MSI Eric Auger
2019-06-03 22:32 ` Alex Williamson
2019-06-07 8:30 ` Auger Eric
2019-05-26 16:10 ` [PATCH v8 25/29] vfio-pci: Add a new VFIO_REGION_TYPE_NESTED region type Eric Auger
2019-06-03 22:31 ` Alex Williamson
2019-06-07 8:28 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-07 12:47 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-07 16:29 ` Alex Williamson
2019-05-26 16:10 ` [PATCH v8 26/29] vfio-pci: Register an iommu fault handler Eric Auger
2019-06-03 22:31 ` Alex Williamson
2019-06-04 16:11 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-05 22:45 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-06 18:54 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-06 20:29 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-07 7:02 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-07 10:28 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-07 17:43 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-10 12:45 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 21:31 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 13:14 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-12 18:53 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 14:04 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-19 0:19 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-19 11:44 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-11 13:07 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-07 12:48 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-07 14:18 ` Auger Eric
2019-05-26 16:10 ` [PATCH v8 27/29] vfio_pci: Allow to mmap the fault queue Eric Auger
2019-05-26 16:10 ` [PATCH v8 28/29] vfio-pci: Add VFIO_PCI_DMA_FAULT_IRQ_INDEX Eric Auger
2019-06-03 22:31 ` Alex Williamson
2019-06-04 16:11 ` Auger Eric
2019-05-26 16:10 ` [PATCH v8 29/29] vfio: Document nested stage control Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d36cf34-a89b-6587-08e9-99242e2f34dc@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.stehle@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).