On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 05:53:01PM -0700, Ruslan Babayev wrote:
> This allows drivers to lookup i2c adapters on ACPI based systems similar to
> of_get_i2c_adapter_by_node() with DT based systems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ruslan Babayev <ruslan@babayev.com>
> Cc: xe-linux-external@cisco.com

Please have a look how your patches look in my inbox:

May 05 Ruslan Babayev  ( 129) [PATCH] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based systems
May 05 Ruslan Babayev  (  65) ├─>[PATCH 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle
May 24 Ruslan Babayev  (  65) └─>[PATCH net-next v2 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle
May 05 Ruslan Babayev  (  65) [PATCH net-next 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle
May 06 Ruslan Babayev  (   3) ├─>[PATCH RFC v2 net-next] Enable SFP support on ACPI
May 06 Ruslan Babayev  (  65) ├─>[PATCH RFC v2 net-next 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle
May 06 Ruslan Babayev  ( 120) └─>[PATCH RFC v2 net-next 2/2] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based systems
May 07 Ruslan Babayev  ( 154)   └─&─>
May 07 Ruslan Babayev  (  10)     └─>
May 22 Ruslan Babayev  (  29)       └─>
May 05 Ruslan Babayev  (  93) [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based systems
May 06 Ruslan Babayev  (  25) ├─&─>
May 06 Ruslan Babayev  (  99) └─&─>

This is highly confusing, and super hard to find out which patches belong
together. v2 2/2 seems even missing. Please resend this as a new series without
any in-reply-to, and a fresh cover-letter, so I know which one to apply to my
tree.

Thanks,

   Wolfram