linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Tom Abraham <tabraham@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI / watchdog: Fix gas->access_width usage
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 12:56:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200212125605.4b2013b4@endymion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212110540.83559-2-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:05:39 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> ACPI Generic Address Structure (GAS) access_width field is not in bytes
> as the driver seems to expect in few places so fix this by using the
> newly introduced macro ACPI_ACCESS_BIT_WIDTH().
> 
> Reported-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Not sure if this is stable material since there is no user visible issues
> without the fix. If this needs to go stable then the ACPICA change need to
> be taken there as well (or we make separate fix for stable without the
> macro).

I thought about it too and I don't think it qualifies for stable
because we have no proof it affects any user in pratcice. You may want
to add a "Fixes:" tag though to track where the bug was introduced and
let distributions backport the fix if they want to.

> 
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_watchdog.c | 3 +--
>  drivers/watchdog/wdat_wdt.c  | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_watchdog.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_watchdog.c
> index b5516b04ffc0..ef0832999892 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_watchdog.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_watchdog.c
> @@ -126,12 +126,11 @@ void __init acpi_watchdog_init(void)
>  		gas = &entries[i].register_region;
>  
>  		res.start = gas->address;
> +		res.end = res.start + ACPI_ACCESS_BIT_WIDTH(gas->access_width) - 1;
>  		if (gas->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) {
>  			res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> -			res.end = res.start + ALIGN(gas->access_width, 4) - 1;
>  		} else if (gas->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {
>  			res.flags = IORESOURCE_IO;
> -			res.end = res.start + gas->access_width - 1;
>  		} else {
>  			pr_warn("Unsupported address space: %u\n",
>  				gas->space_id);
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/wdat_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/wdat_wdt.c
> index b069349b52f5..2132018f031d 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/wdat_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/wdat_wdt.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static int wdat_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  		memset(&r, 0, sizeof(r));
>  		r.start = gas->address;
> -		r.end = r.start + gas->access_width - 1;
> +		r.end = r.start + ACPI_ACCESS_BIT_WIDTH(gas->access_width) - 1;
>  		if (gas->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) {
>  			r.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
>  		} else if (gas->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {

You are using ACPI_ACCESS_BIT_WIDTH() where you clearly meant to use
ACPI_ACCESS_BYTE_WIDTH().

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-12 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-10 10:16 wdat_wdt: access width inconsistency Jean Delvare
2020-02-10 11:23 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-02-11 13:11   ` Jean Delvare
2020-02-11 13:59     ` Mika Westerberg
2020-02-11 16:25       ` Jean Delvare
2020-02-11 16:37         ` Mika Westerberg
2020-02-11 17:03           ` Jean Delvare
2020-02-12 11:05             ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Introduce ACPI_ACCESS_BIT_WIDTH() macro Mika Westerberg
2020-02-12 11:05               ` [PATCH 2/3] ACPI / watchdog: Fix gas->access_width usage Mika Westerberg
2020-02-12 11:56                 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2020-02-12 12:10                   ` Mika Westerberg
2020-02-12 11:05               ` [PATCH 3/3] ACPI / watchdog: Set default timeout in probe Mika Westerberg
2020-02-12 12:07                 ` Jean Delvare
2020-02-12 12:13                   ` Mika Westerberg
2020-02-12 11:52               ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Introduce ACPI_ACCESS_BIT_WIDTH() macro Jean Delvare
2020-02-12 12:08                 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-02-11 16:45         ` wdat_wdt: access width inconsistency Guenter Roeck
2020-02-12 10:30   ` Jean Delvare
2020-02-12 10:47     ` Mika Westerberg
2020-02-12 11:05       ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200212125605.4b2013b4@endymion \
    --to=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tabraham@suse.com \
    --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).