linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] i2c: acpi: put device when verifying client fails
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:29:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200313112932.GA2540@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200312133244.9564-1-wsa@the-dreams.de>

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 02:32:44PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> 
> i2c_verify_client() can fail, so we need to put the device when that
> happens.
> 
> Fixes: 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI reconfigure notifications")
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
> 
> RFC because I don't know if it can be that the returned dev is not an
> i2c_client. Yet, since it can happen theoretically, I think we should
> have the checks.

I agree,

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-13 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-12 13:32 [RFC PATCH] i2c: acpi: put device when verifying client fails Wolfram Sang
2020-03-12 13:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-03-12 14:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-12 14:49   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-12 14:51     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-12 15:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-13 11:29 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2020-03-13 14:16 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200313112932.GA2540@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).