linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: david@redhat.com, lenb@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, osalvador@suse.de,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + acpi-scan-acquire-device_hotplug_lock-in-acpi_scan_init.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:10:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5199522.mxBJLoqJZG@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190725000620.lggHICHUI%akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Thursday, July 25, 2019 2:06:20 AM CEST akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> 
> The patch titled
>      Subject: drivers/acpi/scan.c: acquire device_hotplug_lock in acpi_scan_init()
> has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
>      acpi-scan-acquire-device_hotplug_lock-in-acpi_scan_init.patch
> 
> This patch should soon appear at
>     http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/acpi-scan-acquire-device_hotplug_lock-in-acpi_scan_init.patch
> and later at
>     http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/acpi-scan-acquire-device_hotplug_lock-in-acpi_scan_init.patch
> 
> Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
>    a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
>    b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
>    c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
>       reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
> 
> *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
> 
> The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
> there every 3-4 working days
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Subject: drivers/acpi/scan.c: acquire device_hotplug_lock in acpi_scan_init()
> 
> We end up calling __add_memory() without the device hotplug lock held.  (I
> used a local patch to assert in __add_memory() that the
> device_hotplug_lock is held - I might upstream that as well soon)
> 
> [   26.771684]        create_memory_block_devices+0xa4/0x140
> [   26.772952]        add_memory_resource+0xde/0x200
> [   26.773987]        __add_memory+0x6e/0xa0
> [   26.775161]        acpi_memory_device_add+0x149/0x2b0
> [   26.776263]        acpi_bus_attach+0xf1/0x1f0
> [   26.777247]        acpi_bus_attach+0x66/0x1f0
> [   26.778268]        acpi_bus_attach+0x66/0x1f0
> [   26.779073]        acpi_bus_attach+0x66/0x1f0
> [   26.780143]        acpi_bus_scan+0x3e/0x90
> [   26.780844]        acpi_scan_init+0x109/0x257
> [   26.781638]        acpi_init+0x2ab/0x30d
> [   26.782248]        do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2cf
> [   26.783181]        kernel_init_freeable+0x1bd/0x247
> [   26.784345]        kernel_init+0x5/0xf1
> [   26.785314]        ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
> 
> So perform the locking just like in acpi_device_hotplug().
> 
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190724143017.12841-1-david@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

> ---
> 
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c |    3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c~acpi-scan-acquire-device_hotplug_lock-in-acpi_scan_init
> +++ a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -2204,7 +2204,9 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
>  	acpi_gpe_apply_masked_gpes();
>  	acpi_update_all_gpes();
>  
> +	lock_device_hotplug();
>  	mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
>  	 */
> @@ -2232,6 +2234,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
>  
>   out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&acpi_scan_lock);
> +	unlock_device_hotplug();
>  	return result;
>  }
>  
> _
> 
> Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@redhat.com are
> 
> acpi-scan-acquire-device_hotplug_lock-in-acpi_scan_init.patch
> drivers-base-nodec-simplify-unregister_memory_block_under_nodes.patch
> 
> 





           reply	other threads:[~2019-07-25  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20190725000620.lggHICHUI%akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5199522.mxBJLoqJZG@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).