From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD52C433F5 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CEB60F46 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229999AbhITLAK (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 07:00:10 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f172.google.com ([209.85.167.172]:37661 "EHLO mail-oi1-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232312AbhITLAJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 07:00:09 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f172.google.com with SMTP id w206so12532507oiw.4; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 03:58:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MYrBWTqRqmFwyjRt4MjdtbzQLcVjOOJiZq8OrBBEMY0=; b=O+tU0tRu7JZhQVObRwTSQVe8ApU/YNH85W8TPZuOPcS4SqA+VtEIvtfwFxnCpGUx9A seFPvCVH1tTFQqfpsRarZBJHPJmGajeaWbU2Be5ABwRdFm9boIBD3MSZ6Um8QrTwlWsf milfJhY99KPKyCgT63fItHhAj5peGChJik2LOsM6aSRSCTzaYurLuHjIob1JvbUXspHW nuyU5gJh3yowG1D5TU/6ecT4EM9fMQJPlbCS+mdto0V7fXbnDR9sTIPGmukGxvNH2x6p nM908zY9VrbkzHoTy6Wpj5NGGKVpNNZg2LesePtZXm0YXACJC1abVuMFgk5cnfuhI2+5 Sdrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5301BC0ssWOrahbgrQC+JV2IVyfyTvBhn+Onj+jupQgeXHf6IJrh 2hP6mgcyIhxbs/eDlMFgi7T1inYNs9WxQgA5dPA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKSlKE6VPxmFyhVKDluNKCLco6WzbfdtQIa3vuSJ70sKyXjaZJ48Z8+ukg9D/z5dpVbC7wCBbSzcnZtmM1+c4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:10c1:: with SMTP id s1mr12204133ois.69.1632135522178; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 03:58:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8003272.NyiUUSuA9g@kreacher> <1798761.CQOukoFCf9@kreacher> <70cc742c-f015-9e14-9584-c3415e15085a@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70cc742c-f015-9e14-9584-c3415e15085a@gmail.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 12:58:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] PCI: PM: x86: Drop Intel MID PCI PM support To: Ferry Toth Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux ACPI , Linux PCI , x86 Maintainers , LKML , Bjorn Helgaas , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Len Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ferry Toth wrote: > > Hi, > > Op 18-09-2021 om 15:21 schreef Rafael J. Wysocki: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Support for Intel MID platforms has mostly gone away with the SFI > > support removal in commit 4590d98f5a4f ("sfi: Remove framework for > > deprecated firmware"), but there are some pieces of it still in the > > tree. One of them is the MID PCI PM support code which gets in the > > way of subsequent PCI PM simplifications and trying to update it is > > rather pointless, so get rid of it completely along with the arch > > code pieces that are only used by it. > > Removing PM support for MID will break (among others) Intel Edison, > which is currently in use and running up to date vanilla kernel (v5.14) > and user space. > > I would happily test updates PM when they appear. Thanks for the information, I'll use a different approach then.