From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: "Robert R. Howell" <RHowell@uwyo.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Don't skip late system PM ops for hibernate on BYT/CHT
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:20:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jJEovXXiqs-tzPC7FsGjGL+qxfXCxbTrQZqAxSCv1oyQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <144b56d4-54e6-bccd-4652-22303bcd9168@uwyo.edu>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:03 PM Robert R. Howell <RHowell@uwyo.edu> wrote:
>
> On 4/23/19 2:07 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 12:44 AM Robert R. Howell <RHowell@uwyo.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/18/19 5:42 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>
> >>>> On 4/8/19 2:16 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hmm, interesting so you have hibernation working on a T100TA
> >>>>> (with 5.0 + 02e45646d53b reverted), right ?
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> I've managed to find a way around the i2c_designware timeout issues
> >> on the T100TA's. The key is to NOT set DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND,
> >> which was added in the 02e45646d53b commit.
> >>
> >> To test that I've started with a 5.1-rc5 kernel, applied your recent patch
> >> to acpi_lpss.c, then apply the following patch of mine, removing
> >> DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND. (For the T100 hardware I need to apply some
> >> other patches as well but those are not related to the i2c-designware or
> >> acpi issues addressed here.)
> >>
> >> On a resume from hibernation I still see one error:
> >> "i2c_designware 80860F41:00: Error i2c_dw_xfer called while suspended"
> >> but I no longer get the i2c_designware timeouts, and audio does now work
> >> after the resume.
> >>
> >> Removing DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND may not be what you want for other
> >> hardware, but perhaps this will give you a clue as to what is going
> >> wrong with hibernate/resume on the T100TA's.
> >
> > What if you drop DPM_FLAG_LEAVE_SUSPENDED alone instead?
> >
>
> I did try dropping just DPM_FLAG_LEAVE_SUSPENDED, dropping just
> DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND, and dropping both flags. When I just drop
> DPM_FLAG_LEAVE_SUSPENDED I still get the i2c_designware timeouts
> after the resume. If I drop just DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND or drop both,
> then the timeouts go away.
OK, thanks!
Is non-hibernation system suspend affected too?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-03 5:43 [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Don't skip late system PM ops for hibernate on BYT/CHT Kai-Heng Feng
2019-04-03 8:33 ` Jarkko Nikula
2019-04-03 8:54 ` Hans de Goede
2019-04-07 20:58 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-07 20:58 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-08 3:44 ` Kai Heng Feng
2019-04-08 3:44 ` Kai Heng Feng
2019-04-11 19:50 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-11 19:50 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-08 8:16 ` Hans de Goede
2019-04-08 8:16 ` Hans de Goede
2019-04-11 19:50 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-11 19:50 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-18 11:42 ` Hans de Goede
2019-04-18 11:42 ` Hans de Goede
2019-04-19 22:44 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-19 22:44 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-23 8:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-23 8:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-23 20:03 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-23 20:03 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-24 7:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-04-24 7:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-25 16:38 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-25 16:38 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-04-30 14:39 ` Hans de Goede
2019-04-30 14:39 ` Hans de Goede
2019-05-09 4:24 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-05-09 8:50 ` Hans de Goede
2019-05-09 18:09 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-05-13 8:41 ` Hans de Goede
2019-05-16 16:34 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-05-14 10:10 ` Hans de Goede
2019-05-16 11:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-16 16:35 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-05-16 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-25 5:31 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-06-24 10:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-24 10:51 ` Hans de Goede
2019-06-24 23:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-26 18:43 ` Robert R. Howell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0jJEovXXiqs-tzPC7FsGjGL+qxfXCxbTrQZqAxSCv1oyQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=RHowell@uwyo.edu \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).