From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] acpi/numa: Establish a new drivers/acpi/numa/ directory
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:48:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4js1XqSe1kNeWob=ftscYFKQF+04PrKj7XDiEWUWvnMvQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0j_-iSqiysZiW=J8Y5FCAjnPC7ZvevrLsYhngWr6mT6GQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:02 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:25 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:13 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently hmat.c lives under an "hmat" directory which does not enhance
> > > the description of the file. The initial motivation for giving hmat.c
> > > its own directory was to delineate it as mm functionality in contrast to
> > > ACPI device driver functionality.
> > >
> > > As ACPI continues to play an increasing role in conveying
> > > memory location and performance topology information to the OS take the
> > > opportunity to co-locate these NUMA relevant tables in a combined
> > > directory.
> > >
> > > numa.c is renamed to srat.c and moved to drivers/acpi/numa/ along with
> > > hmat.c.
> > >
> > > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >
> > Please note that https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11078171/ is being
> > pushed to Linus (it is overdue anyway), so if it is pulled, there will
> > be a merge conflict with this patch.
> >
> > Respin maybe?
>
> Actually, would you mind it if I took this one into the ACPI tree right away?
>
> There's https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11198373/ queued up that,
> again, will clash with it.
>
> Also, there is the generic Initiator proximity domains series from
> Jonathan depending on it and I would like to move forward with that
> one if there are no objections.
Given Ard has acked all the EFI core and ARM changes can we proceed
with merging the EFI Specific Purpose Memory series through Rafael's
tree? It would need acks from x86 maintainers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-22 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-16 0:59 [PATCH v7 00/12] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] acpi/numa: Establish a new drivers/acpi/numa/ directory Dan Williams
2019-10-18 9:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-22 10:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-22 16:48 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-10-28 15:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-29 3:06 ` Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] efi: Enumerate EFI_MEMORY_SP Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] x86/efi: Push EFI_MEMMAP check into leaf routines Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] efi: Common enable/disable infrastructure for EFI soft reservation Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] x86/efi: EFI soft reservation to E820 enumeration Dan Williams
2019-10-16 0:59 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] arm/efi: EFI soft reservation to memblock Dan Williams
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] x86/efi: Add efi_fake_mem support for EFI_MEMORY_SP Dan Williams
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] lib: Uplevel the pmem "region" ida to a global allocator Dan Williams
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] dax: Fix alloc_dax_region() compile warning Dan Williams
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] device-dax: Add a driver for "hmem" devices Dan Williams
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] acpi/numa/hmat: Register HMAT at device_initcall level Dan Williams
2019-10-17 21:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 1:00 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] acpi/numa/hmat: Register "soft reserved" memory as an "hmem" device Dan Williams
2019-10-17 21:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 6:54 ` [PATCH v7 00/12] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-16 15:33 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPcyv4js1XqSe1kNeWob=ftscYFKQF+04PrKj7XDiEWUWvnMvQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).