From: Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: PM: Simplify and unify some helper functions
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 22:14:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe9b4f36-0b46-f8d7-4a4c-9bdefe1fbd90@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7312660.EvYhyI6sBW@kreacher>
Hi,
Op 29-09-2021 om 20:05 schreef Rafael J. Wysocki:
> Hi All,
>
> This series is on top of the linux-next branch from linux-pm.git:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
>
> which should be included in linux-next.
>
> Two of the 3 patches in this series, [1-2/3], were included in the "PCI: ACPI:
> Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops and clean up code" series:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/1800633.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher/
>
> and the remaining one, [3/3] is a new version of a problematic patch from that
> series. The rest of that series is present in the git branch above.
>
> All of the 3 patches in this set need to be tested in order to verify that
> there are no more issues that need to be addressed in them.
>
> Ferry, please test!
This is how I tested:
3 patches from
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/2793105.e9J7NaK4W3@kreacher/
on top of 5.15.0-rc2 as before
4 patches from v2 in the order of linux-pm.git
then tested without, with 1/3, 1+2/3, 1+2+3/3 on top (with only 3/3 the
new patch, 1+2/3 taken from v2 as they are unchanged).
In all 4 cases I didn't find any trouble (related to this patch).
Thanks for doing this!
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-03 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-20 18:52 [PATCH v2 0/7] PCI: ACPI: Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops and clean up code Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-20 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] PCI: PM: Do not use pci_platform_pm_ops for Intel MID PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-20 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] PCI: ACPI: PM: Do not use pci_platform_pm_ops for ACPI Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-22 21:30 ` Ferry Toth
2021-09-23 11:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <013e3a7b-ec67-1a67-c2b9-e1fbb11c664e@gmail.com>
2021-09-23 13:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-23 13:51 ` Ferry Toth
2021-09-23 20:32 ` Ferry Toth
2021-09-24 12:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-24 14:52 ` Ferry Toth
2021-09-24 21:17 ` Ferry Toth
2021-09-27 13:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-29 19:08 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-09-29 19:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-20 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] PCI: PM: Drop struct pci_platform_pm_ops Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-20 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] PCI: PM: Rearrange pci_target_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-20 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] PCI: PM: Make pci_choose_state() call pci_target_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-20 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] PCI: PM: Do not call platform_pci_power_manageable() unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-20 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] PCI: PM: Simplify acpi_pci_power_manageable() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-28 23:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] PCI: ACPI: Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops and clean up code Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-29 12:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-29 15:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-29 17:14 ` Ferry Toth
2021-09-29 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: PM: Simplify and unify some helper functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-29 18:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] PCI: PM: Rearrange pci_target_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-29 18:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] PCI: PM: Make pci_choose_state() call pci_target_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-29 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: PM: Do not call platform_pci_power_manageable() unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-10-03 20:14 ` Ferry Toth [this message]
2021-10-05 11:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: PM: Simplify and unify some helper functions Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe9b4f36-0b46-f8d7-4a4c-9bdefe1fbd90@gmail.com \
--to=fntoth@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).