From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: introduce MADV_CLR_HUGEPAGE
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:18:09 +0200
Message-ID: <20170531141809.GB302@redhat.com>
References: <20170524111800.GD14733@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20170524142735.GF3063@rapoport-lnx>
 <20170530074408.GA7969@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20170530101921.GA25738@rapoport-lnx>
 <20170530103930.GB7969@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20170530140456.GA8412@redhat.com>
 <20170530143941.GK7969@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20170530154326.GB8412@redhat.com>
 <20170531120822.GL27783@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <8FA5E4C2-D289-4AF5-AA09-6C199E58F9A5@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8FA5E4C2-D289-4AF5-AA09-6C199E58F9A5@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
To: Mike Rapoprt <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:39:22PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> For the CRIU usecase, disabling THP for a while and re-enabling it
> back will do the trick, provided VMAs flags are not affected, like
> in the patch you've sent.  Moreover, we may even get away with

Are you going to check uname -r to know when the kABI changed in your
favor (so CRIU cannot ever work with enterprise backports unless you
expand the uname -r coverage), or how do you know the patch is
applied?

Optimistically assuming people is going to run new CRIU code only on
new kernels looks very risky, it would leads to silent random memory
corruption, so I doubt you can get away without a uname -r check.

This is fairly simple change too, its main cons is that it adds a
branch to the page fault fast path, the old behavior of the prctl and
the new madvise were both zero cost.

Still if the prctl is preferred despite the added branch, to avoid
uname -r clashes, to me it sounds better to add a new prctl ID and
keep the old one too. The old one could be implemented the same way as
the new one if you want to save a few bytes of .text. But the old one
should probably do a printk_once to print a deprecation warning so the
old ID with weaker (zero runtime cost) semantics can be removed later.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>