linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: io_uring vs in_compat_syscall()
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:34:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200721143412.GA8099@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXWZBXZuCeRYvYY8AWG51e_P3bOeNeqc8zXPLOTDTHY0g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 07:31:02AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > What do you mean with "properly wired up".  Do you really want to spread
> > ->compat_foo methods everywhere, including read and write?  I found
> > in_compat_syscall() a lot small and easier to maintain than all the
> > separate compat cruft.
> 
> I was imagining using a flag.  Some of the net code uses
> MSG_CMSG_COMPAT for this purpose.

Killing that nightmarish monster is what actually got me into looking
io_uring and starting this thread.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-21 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-20  6:10 io_uring vs in_compat_syscall() Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-20 16:36 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-20 16:58   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-20 17:02     ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-20 17:28       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-21  7:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-21 14:31           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-21 14:34             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-07-21 17:25               ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-22  6:30                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-22  8:39                   ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200721143412.GA8099@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).