From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
<x86@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Miguel Luis" <miguel.luis@oracle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Salil Mehta" <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Cc: <justin.he@arm.com>, <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/18] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info()
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:00:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240416145917.00004a7b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-4-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:04 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>
> The arm64 specific arch_register_cpu() call may defer CPU registration
> until the ACPI interpreter is available and the _STA method can
> be evaluated.
>
> If this occurs, then a second attempt is made in
> acpi_processor_get_info(). Note that the arm64 specific call has
> not yet been added so for now this will never be successfully
> called.
>
> Systems can still be booted with 'acpi=off', or not include an
> ACPI description at all as in these cases arch_register_cpu()
> will not have deferred registration when first called.
>
> This moves the CPU register logic back to a subsys_initcall(),
> while the memory nodes will have been registered earlier.
> Note this is where the call was prior to the cleanup series so
> there should be no side effects of moving it back again for this
> specific case.
>
> [PATCH 00/21] Initial cleanups for vCPU HP.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZVyz%2FVe5pPu8AWoA@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
>
> e.g. 5b95f94c3b9f ("x86/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES")
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
> Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joanthan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> v5: Update commit message to make it clear this is moving the
> init back to where it was until very recently.
>
> No longer change the condition in the earlier registration point
> as that will be handled by the arm64 registration routine
> deferring until called again here.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index 93e029403d05..c78398cdd060 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -317,6 +317,18 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>
> c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, pr->id);
> ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&c->dev, device);
> + /*
> + * Register CPUs that are present. get_cpu_device() is used to skip
> + * duplicate CPU descriptions from firmware.
> + */
> + if (!invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) && cpu_present(pr->id) &&
> + !get_cpu_device(pr->id)) {
Just a quick note to call out that this case of 'duplicate' firmware
description needs an updated comment. Now we are not deferring
registration on x86 this is detecting that arch_register_cpu()
has already been successfully called and we should not do it again.
I've added rather more detailed comments enumerating of the paths we
can take to hit acpi_processor_hotadd_init() in the v6 series
(tests ongoing)
Jonathan
> + int ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Extra Processor objects may be enumerated on MP systems with
> * less than the max # of CPUs. They should be ignored _iff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 14:37 [PATCH v5 00/18] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] cpu: Do not warn on arch_register_cpu() returning -EPROBE_DEFER Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 17:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-22 3:53 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] ACPI: processor: Set the ACPI_COMPANION for the struct cpu instance Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 18:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 15:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 16:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 16:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 16:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 17:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 17:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-16 17:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 18:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-12 20:16 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-04-12 20:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-12 21:52 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-04-12 23:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-15 8:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 9:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 9:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 12:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 12:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 17:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 19:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-17 10:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 12:37 ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 12:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:51 ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 12:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 15:31 ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 16:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-17 15:01 ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-17 16:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 10:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:07 ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-16 14:00 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor guards Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] ACPI: utils: Add an acpi_sta_enabled() helper and use it in acpi_processor_make_present() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] ACPI: scan: Add parameter to allow defering some actions in acpi_scan_check_and_detach Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] ACPI: convert acpi_processor_post_eject() to use IS_ENABLED() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] arm64: arch_register_cpu() variant to allow checking of ACPI _STA Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] ACPI: add support to (un)register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240416145917.00004a7b@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).