From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [NEEDS-REVIEW] Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for shadow stack
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:08:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f137667122486a0cea3b0dbfa99d02f74870673.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf2ab309-f8c4-83da-1c0a-5684e5bc5c82@intel.com>
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 17:12 -0700, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
> On 9/14/2020 7:50 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 9/11/20 3:59 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > ...
> > > Here are the changes if we take the mprotect(PROT_SHSTK) approach.
> > > Any comments/suggestions?
> >
> > I still don't like it. :)
> >
> > I'll also be much happier when there's a proper changelog to accompany
> > this which also spells out the alternatives any why they suck so much.
[...]
I revised it. If this turns out needing more work/discussion, we can split it
out from the shadow stack series.
Thanks,
Yu-cheng
------
From 114f3108207e3eb15fe13b3ff43d1ac273b5072a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:41:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm: Introduce PROT_SHSTK for shadow stack
There are three possible options to create a shadow stack allocation API:
an arch_prctl, a new syscall, or adding PROT_SHSTK to mmap()/mprotect().
Each has its advantages and compromises.
An arch_prctl() is the least intrusive. However, the existing x86
arch_prctl() takes only two parameters. Multiple parameters must be
passed in a memory buffer. There is a proposal to pass more parameters in
registers [1], but no active discussion on that.
A new syscall minimizes compatibility issues and offers an extensible frame
work to other architectures, but this will likely result in some overlap of
mmap()/mprotect().
The introduction of PROT_SHSTK to mmap()/mprotect() takes advantage of
existing APIs. The x86-specific PROT_SHSTK is translated to VM_SHSTK, and
a shadow stack mapping is created without reinventing the wheel. There are
potential pitfalls though. The most obvious one would be using this as a
bypass to shadow stack protection. However, the attacker would have to get
to the syscall first.
Since arch_calc_vm_prot_bits() is modified, I have moved arch_vm_get_page
_prot() and arch_calc_vm_prot_bits() to x86/include/asm/mman.h.
This will be more consistent with other architectures.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200828121624.108243-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mman.h | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h | 28 ++------------
mm/mprotect.c | 10 +++++
3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mman.h
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mman.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mman.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2f19e429c9e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mman.h
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _ASM_X86_MMAN_H
+#define _ASM_X86_MMAN_H
+
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <uapi/asm/mman.h>
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
+/*
+ * Take the 4 protection key bits out of the vma->vm_flags
+ * value and turn them in to the bits that we can put in
+ * to a pte.
+ *
+ * Only override these if Protection Keys are available
+ * (which is only on 64-bit).
+ */
+#define arch_vm_get_page_prot(vm_flags) __pgprot( \
+ ((vm_flags) & VM_PKEY_BIT0 ? _PAGE_PKEY_BIT0 : 0) | \
+ ((vm_flags) & VM_PKEY_BIT1 ? _PAGE_PKEY_BIT1 : 0) | \
+ ((vm_flags) & VM_PKEY_BIT2 ? _PAGE_PKEY_BIT2 : 0) | \
+ ((vm_flags) & VM_PKEY_BIT3 ? _PAGE_PKEY_BIT3 : 0))
+
+#define pkey_vm_prot_bits(prot, key) ( \
+ ((key) & 0x1 ? VM_PKEY_BIT0 : 0) | \
+ ((key) & 0x2 ? VM_PKEY_BIT1 : 0) | \
+ ((key) & 0x4 ? VM_PKEY_BIT2 : 0) | \
+ ((key) & 0x8 ? VM_PKEY_BIT3 : 0))
+#else
+#define pkey_vm_prot_bits(prot, key) (0)
+#endif
+
+static inline unsigned long arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(unsigned long prot,
+ unsigned long pkey)
+{
+ unsigned long vm_prot_bits = pkey_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey);
+
+ vm_prot_bits |= ((prot & PROT_SHSTK) ? VM_SHSTK : 0);
+ return vm_prot_bits;
+}
+#define arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey) arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey)
+
+static inline bool arch_validate_prot(unsigned long prot, unsigned long addr)
+{
+ unsigned long supported = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC | PROT_SEM;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_SHADOW_STACK_USER) &&
+ static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) && (prot & PROT_SHSTK)) {
+ supported |= PROT_SHSTK;
+
+ /*
+ * A shadow stack mapping is indirectly writable by only
+ * the CALL and WRUSS instructions, but not other write
+ * instructions). PROT_SHSTK and PROT_WRITE are mutually
+ * exclusive.
+ */
+ supported &= ~PROT_WRITE;
+ }
+
+ return (prot & ~supported) == 0;
+}
+#define arch_validate_prot arch_validate_prot
+
+#endif /* _ASM_X86_MMAN_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
index d4a8d0424bfb..39bb7db344a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
@@ -1,31 +1,11 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
-#ifndef _ASM_X86_MMAN_H
-#define _ASM_X86_MMAN_H
+#ifndef _UAPI_ASM_X86_MMAN_H
+#define _UAPI_ASM_X86_MMAN_H
#define MAP_32BIT 0x40 /* only give out 32bit addresses */
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
-/*
- * Take the 4 protection key bits out of the vma->vm_flags
- * value and turn them in to the bits that we can put in
- * to a pte.
- *
- * Only override these if Protection Keys are available
- * (which is only on 64-bit).
- */
-#define arch_vm_get_page_prot(vm_flags) __pgprot( \
- ((vm_flags) & VM_PKEY_BIT0 ? _PAGE_PKEY_BIT0 : 0) | \
- ((vm_flags) & VM_PKEY_BIT1 ? _PAGE_PKEY_BIT1 : 0) | \
- ((vm_flags) & VM_PKEY_BIT2 ? _PAGE_PKEY_BIT2 : 0) | \
- ((vm_flags) & VM_PKEY_BIT3 ? _PAGE_PKEY_BIT3 : 0))
-
-#define arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, key) ( \
- ((key) & 0x1 ? VM_PKEY_BIT0 : 0) | \
- ((key) & 0x2 ? VM_PKEY_BIT1 : 0) | \
- ((key) & 0x4 ? VM_PKEY_BIT2 : 0) | \
- ((key) & 0x8 ? VM_PKEY_BIT3 : 0))
-#endif
+#define PROT_SHSTK 0x10 /* shadow stack pages */
#include <asm-generic/mman.h>
-#endif /* _ASM_X86_MMAN_H */
+#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_X86_MMAN_H */
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index a8edbcb3af99..27a1b7a4e89c 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -571,6 +571,16 @@ static int do_mprotect_pkey(unsigned long start, size_t
len,
goto out;
}
}
+
+ /*
+ * Only anonymous mapping is suitable for shadow stack. A function
+ * call stack should not be backed by a file.
+ */
+ if ((prot & PROT_SHSTK) && (vma->vm_file)) {
+ error = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
if (start > vma->vm_start)
prev = vma;
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 0:25 [PATCH v11 00/25] Control-flow Enforcement: Shadow Stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 01/25] Documentation/x86: Add CET description Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 02/25] x86/cpufeatures: Add CET CPU feature flags for Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET) Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 03/25] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce CET MSR XSAVES supervisor states Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 04/25] x86/cet: Add control-protection fault handler Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 05/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add Kconfig option for user-mode Shadow Stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 06/25] x86/mm: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_HW Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 07/25] x86/mm: Remove _PAGE_DIRTY_HW from kernel RO pages Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 08/25] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_COW Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 09/25] drm/i915/gvt: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_BITS Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 10/25] x86/mm: Update pte_modify for _PAGE_COW Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 11/25] x86/mm: Update ptep_set_wrprotect() and pmdp_set_wrprotect() for transition from _PAGE_DIRTY_HW to _PAGE_COW Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 12/25] mm: Introduce VM_SHSTK for shadow stack memory Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 13/25] x86/mm: Shadow Stack page fault error checking Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 14/25] x86/mm: Update maybe_mkwrite() for shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 15/25] mm: Fixup places that call pte_mkwrite() directly Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 16/25] mm: Add guard pages around a shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 17/25] mm/mmap: Add shadow stack pages to memory accounting Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 18/25] mm: Update can_follow_write_pte() for shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 19/25] mm: Re-introduce do_mmap_pgoff() Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 20/25] x86/cet/shstk: User-mode shadow stack support Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 21/25] x86/cet/shstk: Handle signals for shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 22/25] binfmt_elf: Define GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND properties Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 23/25] ELF: Introduce arch_setup_elf_property() Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 24/25] x86/cet/shstk: Handle thread shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for " Yu-cheng Yu
2020-08-25 0:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-08-25 18:43 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-08-25 19:19 ` Dave Hansen
2020-08-25 21:04 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-08-25 23:20 ` Dave Hansen
2020-08-25 23:34 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-08-26 16:46 ` Dave Martin
2020-08-26 16:51 ` Florian Weimer
2020-08-26 17:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-08-26 18:49 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-08-26 19:43 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-26 19:57 ` Dave Hansen
2020-08-27 13:26 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-01 10:28 ` Dave Martin
2020-09-01 17:23 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-09-01 17:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-01 18:11 ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-02 13:58 ` Dave Martin
[not found] ` <46dffdfd-92f8-0f05-6164-945f217b0958@intel.com>
2020-09-08 17:57 ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-08 18:25 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-09-09 22:08 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-09-09 22:59 ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-09 23:07 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-09-09 23:11 ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-09 23:25 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-09-09 23:29 ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-09 23:45 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-09-11 22:59 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-09-14 14:50 ` [NEEDS-REVIEW] " Dave Hansen
2020-09-14 18:31 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-14 20:44 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-09-14 21:14 ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-16 13:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-16 19:25 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2021-09-14 1:33 ` [NEEDS-REVIEW] " Edgecombe, Rick P
2021-09-14 9:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-20 16:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-09-23 23:32 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
[not found] ` <bf2ab309-f8c4-83da-1c0a-5684e5bc5c82@intel.com>
2020-09-15 19:08 ` Yu-cheng Yu [this message]
2020-09-15 19:24 ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-15 20:16 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-08-26 17:08 ` Dave Martin
2020-08-27 13:18 ` Florian Weimer
2020-08-27 13:28 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-27 13:36 ` Florian Weimer
2020-08-27 14:07 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-27 14:08 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-01 17:49 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-09-01 17:50 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-01 17:58 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-09-01 18:17 ` Florian Weimer
2020-09-01 18:19 ` H.J. Lu
2020-09-01 18:24 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-08-27 18:13 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-08-27 18:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-08-27 19:33 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2020-08-27 19:37 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-28 1:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-08-28 1:44 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-28 6:23 ` Florian Weimer
2020-08-28 11:37 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-28 17:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-08-28 17:45 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f137667122486a0cea3b0dbfa99d02f74870673.camel@intel.com \
--to=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).