From: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Anup Patel" <Anup.Patel@wdc.com>,
"Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
"Drew Fustini" <drew@beagleboard.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
wefu@redhat.com, "Wei Wu (吴伟)" <lazyparser@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, "Guo Ren" <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] riscv: Add DMA_COHERENT support
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 22:47:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTTpurWpPUcA2JkF0rOFztKQgFBhOF9zQyuyi_-sxszhRQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a03sxxnzpZPxNnXLtCFOFBZ6espEj4V5y=K+59dOLJc6A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Arnd & Palmer,
Sorry for the delayed reply, I'm working on the next version of the patch.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:56 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Jun 2021 23:00:29 PDT (-0700), Anup Patel wrote:
> > >> This implementation, which adds some Kconfig entries that control page table
> > >> bits, definately isn't suitable for upstream. Allowing users to set arbitrary
> > >> page table bits will eventually conflict with the standard, and is just going to
> > >> be a mess. It'll also lead to kernels that are only compatible with specific
> > >> designs, which we're trying very hard to avoid. At a bare minimum we'll need
> > >> some way to detect systems with these page table bits before setting them,
> > >> and some description of what the bits actually do so we can reason about
> > >> them.
> > >
> > > Yes, vendor specific Kconfig options are strict NO NO. We can't give-up the
> > > goal of unified kernel image for all platforms.
Okay, Agree. Please help review the next version of the patch.
> >
> > I think this is just a phrasing issue, but just to be sure:
> >
> > IMO it's not that they're vendor-specific Kconfig options, it's that
> > turning them on will conflict with standard systems (and other vendors).
> > We've already got the ability to select sets of Kconfig settings that
> > will only boot on one vendor's system, which is fine, as long as there
> > remains a set of Kconfig settings that will boot on all systems.
> >
> > An example here would be the errata: every system has errata of some
> > sort, so if we start flipping off various vendor's errata Kconfigs
> > you'll end up with kernels that only function properly on some systems.
> > That's fine with me, as long as it's possible to turn on all vendor's
> > errata Kconfigs at the same time and the resulting kernel functions
> > correctly on all systems.
>
> Yes, this is generally the goal, and it would be great to have that
> working in a way where a 'defconfig' build just turns on all the options
> that are needed to use any SoC specific features and drivers while
> still working on all hardware. There are however limits you may run
> into at some point, and other architectures usually only manage to span
> some 10 to 15 years of hardware implementations with a single
> kernel before it get really hard.
I could follow the goal in the next version of the patchset. Please
help review, thx.
>
> To give some common examples that make it break down:
>
> - 32-bit vs 64-bit already violates that rule on risc-v (as it does on
> most other architectures)
>
> - architectures that support both big-endian and little-endian kernels
> tend to have platforms that require one or the other (e.g. mips,
> though not arm). Not an issue for you.
>
> - page table formats are the main cause of incompatibility: arm32
> and x86-32 require three-level tables for certain features, but those
> are incompatible with older cores, arm64 supports three different
> page sizes, but none of them works on all cores (4KB almost works
> everywhere).
>
> - SMP-enabled ARMv7 kernels can be configured to run on either
> ARMv6 or ARMv8, but not both, in this case because of incompatible
> barrier instructions.
>
> - 32-bit Arm has a couple more remaining features that require building
> a machine specific kernel if enabled because they hardcode physical
> addresses: early printk (debug_ll, not the normal earlycon), NOMMU,
> and XIP.
>
> Arnd
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-04 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-19 5:04 [PATCH RFC 0/3] riscv: Add DMA_COHERENT support guoren
2021-05-19 5:04 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] riscv: pgtable.h: Fixup _PAGE_CHG_MASK usage guoren
2021-05-19 5:04 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] riscv: Add DMA_COHERENT for custom PTE attributes guoren
2021-05-19 5:04 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] riscv: Add SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU/DEVICE for DMA_COHERENT guoren
2021-05-19 6:32 ` Guo Ren
2021-05-19 5:20 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] riscv: Add DMA_COHERENT support Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-19 5:48 ` Guo Ren
2021-05-19 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-19 6:09 ` Guo Ren
2021-05-19 6:44 ` Drew Fustini
2021-05-19 6:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-20 1:45 ` Guo Ren
2021-05-20 5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-06 18:14 ` Nick Kossifidis
2021-06-07 0:04 ` Guo Ren
2021-06-07 2:16 ` Nick Kossifidis
2021-06-07 3:19 ` Guo Ren
2021-06-07 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-07 6:41 ` Guo Ren
2021-06-07 6:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-07 7:46 ` Guo Ren
2021-06-08 15:00 ` David Laight
2021-06-08 15:32 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2021-06-08 16:11 ` David Laight
2021-06-07 8:35 ` Nick Kossifidis
2021-06-09 3:28 ` Guo Ren
2021-06-09 6:05 ` Jisheng Zhang
2021-06-09 9:45 ` Nick Kossifidis
2021-06-09 12:43 ` Guo Ren
2021-05-19 6:05 ` Guo Ren
2021-05-19 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-19 6:11 ` Guo Ren
2021-05-19 6:54 ` Drew Fustini
2021-05-19 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-19 7:14 ` Anup Patel
2021-05-19 8:25 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-20 1:47 ` Guo Ren
2021-05-20 1:59 ` Guo Ren
2021-05-22 0:36 ` Guo Ren
2021-05-30 0:30 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-06-03 4:13 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-06-03 6:00 ` Anup Patel
2021-06-03 15:39 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-06-04 9:02 ` David Laight
2021-06-04 9:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-04 14:47 ` Guo Ren [this message]
2021-06-04 16:12 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-06-04 21:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-04 22:10 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-06-08 12:26 ` Guo Ren
2021-06-06 17:11 ` Guo Ren
2021-06-07 3:38 ` Anup Patel
2021-06-07 4:22 ` Guo Ren
2021-06-07 4:47 ` Anup Patel
2021-06-07 5:08 ` Guo Ren
2021-06-07 5:13 ` Guo Ren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJF2gTTpurWpPUcA2JkF0rOFztKQgFBhOF9zQyuyi_-sxszhRQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=Anup.Patel@wdc.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=drew@beagleboard.org \
--cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=lazyparser@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=wefu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).